Login

russian armor

Let's talk about Volksgrenadiers

PAGES (10)down
17 Jun 2015, 07:02 AM
#181
avatar of BeefSurge

Posts: 1891

I'm half expecting the OKW to be a decent "rush" faction, if what I've heard becomes reality. I love my Sturms.
17 Jun 2015, 08:14 AM
#182
avatar of Fluffi

Posts: 211

They should move Volks to the Mechanized Regiment HQ, need Sturmpios but buff price, and make Kubel suppression cost Munitions. Also give Puppchen better anti infantry, and vet 0 stealth.

These new Volks should have 6 men, dps adjusted to match before but with price increase to 270.


Sorry to once again disagree with you, but that does not sound well thought out at all. Also, people may feel obliged to go MedTruck then; that suggestion in particular, is IMO pretty terrible. Also, why would kinda elite-seeming Sturmpos be in the HQ while the crappy seeming Volks would then require T1. So illogical...
17 Jun 2015, 08:22 AM
#183
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Jun 2015, 08:14 AMFluffi

So illogical...

As the whole okw faction design.
17 Jun 2015, 09:40 AM
#184
avatar of JohnnyB

Posts: 2396 | Subs: 1

Stop crying over OKW "bad design". The actual OKW status is due to the long overnerfing list that it received along the way, since creation untill today. To adjust and operate changes is good. Overnerfing is bad and force you to do other changes that are no needed and that will trigger other changes. If brits will be changed in the same way, we will not recognize the faction in one year mark. As happened to OKW.

It's kinda same situation with women: All their life they are trying to change you, and when they finaly did it, they look at you and say: "you are not the man I fell in love with anymore".
17 Jun 2015, 10:04 AM
#185
avatar of Highfiveeeee

Posts: 1740

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Jun 2015, 09:40 AMJohnnyB

It's kinda same situation with women: All their life they are trying to change you, and when they finaly did it, they look at you and say: "you are not the man I fell in love with anymore".


17 Jun 2015, 10:07 AM
#186
avatar of Fluffi

Posts: 211

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Jun 2015, 08:22 AMKatitof

As the whole okw faction design.


I disagree. OKW is just as 'illogical' as any other faction, then. This is a game that's suppossed to transport a certain atmosphere and feel. OKW does that. All factions do. Each has it's own vibe, and they did a good job defining the different characters of the armies. Considering that there is 2 german armies, they did a good job making each feel unique and recognizeable. I think, desing-wise, OKW is better than what they did with Panzerelite as a 2nd german army.
17 Jun 2015, 10:47 AM
#187
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Jun 2015, 10:07 AMFluffi


I disagree. OKW is just as 'illogical' as any other faction, then. This is a game that's suppossed to transport a certain atmosphere and feel. OKW does that. All factions do. Each has it's own vibe, and they did a good job defining the different characters of the armies. Considering that there is 2 german armies, they did a good job making each feel unique and recognizeable. I think, desing-wise, OKW is better than what they did with Panzerelite as a 2nd german army.

Actually, OKW is designed around snowball effect.
Its supported by vet5 system and powerful mid and late game stock units.

It starts rolling small and slow, until it reaches critical mass of vetted infantry with armored support that you can't stop.
OKW is weak in 1v1, because the weakness of the army can be exploited most and both sov and USF have good early game, the longer the game drags, the bigger OKW advantage gets.
That is why among other things, OKW is strongest army in 2v2 and up, where the games last longer and exploiting early game weakness isn't as easy.

Volks are prime example of the OKW snowball design, they start slow, can fight only in numbers only to become vet5 in no time thanks to shrecks and form then on they can effectively fight most units because of scaling. Add other mid to late game units and you have a force that can be contested only if you frequently squad wipe them.

You may excuse it all you want, I call it by its name - bad faction design.
OKW does most certainly have a unique feel in contrast to other armies, but its still flawed at its core.
Buffing and nerfing units adjusts balance of the faction to a point, but it'll always be overpowering late game and underpowered early game as long as it holds to current principles.
17 Jun 2015, 12:30 PM
#188
avatar of Imagelessbean

Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Jun 2015, 10:47 AMKatitof

Actually, OKW is designed around snowball effect.
Its supported by vet5 system and powerful mid and late game stock units.

It starts rolling small and slow, until it reaches critical mass of vetted infantry with armored support that you can't stop.
OKW is weak in 1v1, because the weakness of the army can be exploited most and both sov and USF have good early game, the longer the game drags, the bigger OKW advantage gets.
That is why among other things, OKW is strongest army in 2v2 and up, where the games last longer and exploiting early game weakness isn't as easy.

Volks are prime example of the OKW snowball design, they start slow, can fight only in numbers only to become vet5 in no time thanks to shrecks and form then on they can effectively fight most units because of scaling. Add other mid to late game units and you have a force that can be contested only if you frequently squad wipe them.

You may excuse it all you want, I call it by its name - bad faction design.
OKW does most certainly have a unique feel in contrast to other armies, but its still flawed at its core.
Buffing and nerfing units adjusts balance of the faction to a point, but it'll always be overpowering late game and underpowered early game as long as it holds to current principles.


I've got to agree entirely with this. The OKW is a fataly flawed faction at its core.

Vet 4 & 5 should die in a fire and the faction rebalanced from there.
17 Jun 2015, 15:15 PM
#189
avatar of Vuther
Senior Moderator Badge

Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1



I've got to agree entirely with this. The OKW is a fataly flawed faction at its core.

Vet 4 & 5 should die in a fire and the faction rebalanced from there.

I feel like vet 4 & 5 are workable. Any problems with them are the stat bonuses being too big and simplistically powerful for combat (e.g. vet 4 suppression on Obers). If they aren't all big combat bonuses, like vet 5 sprinting, I doubt it'd be too much of a problem.
17 Jun 2015, 15:24 PM
#190
avatar of QueenRatchet123

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post17 Jun 2015, 15:15 PMVuther

I feel like vet 4 & 5 are workable. Any problems with them are the stat bonuses being too big and simplistically powerful for combat (e.g. vet 4 suppression on Obers). If they aren't all big combat bonuses, like vet 5 sprinting, I doubt it'd be too much of a problem.


I agree, there should be 3 stat buffs and 2 ability gains with vet.
17 Jun 2015, 15:32 PM
#191
avatar of WingZero

Posts: 1484

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Jun 2015, 09:40 AMJohnnyB

It's kinda same situation with women: All their life they are trying to change you, and when they finaly did it, they look at you and say: "you are not the man I fell in love with anymore".


Hahah well said!
17 Jun 2015, 16:48 PM
#192
avatar of Alexzandvar

Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Jun 2015, 10:47 AMKatitof

Stuff


True once upon a time, not really anymore. OKW's late game advantage has been hernangled to pretty much be on par with Ostheer/Soviets (USF still suffers but with good micro can do fine) since Relic realized a faction that auto wins after a certain time period is dumb just like Necrons and IG were in Dark Crusade.

Vet 4 and 5 on OKW units outside of Volks is quite rare, and you will always have less vehicles than your enemy does assuming equal map control. The reason why OKW appears to do so well late game is they don't need to micro nearly as many units as other factions do, but the investment in those units are so huge. Losing multiple vetted squads or a Panther can easily be GG for OKW in 1's and 2's.

17 Jun 2015, 18:32 PM
#193
avatar of Fluffi

Posts: 211

jump backJump back to quoted post17 Jun 2015, 10:47 AMKatitof

stuff


I kinda agree about the snowball effect. It still is a phenomenon that OKW gets better in bigger team games, isn't it? If so, maybe it would help if they were more well rounded. Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think in team games, their shortcomings are filled by Ostheer team mates (fuel caches, MGs and med. tank). I think, if OKW had a non-doct. med. tank and MGs (or a Kubel that is more similar to MGs), it would be easier to balance them in regard of all game modes. At the same time, fuel caches maybe shouldn't benefit allied OKW players. Just ideas, though.
Also, I have no problem with 5 vet levels. But Volks are seen with 5vet too often. Slower vet for them maybe?

However, I would not call the design of the faction fundamentaly flawed. I consider many aspects part of the desingn, the idea, the feel, skins, voice acting... and all of that is actually VERY well made with the WFA factions! If these things were not well made, it would be much worse, and then it really would be fundamentaly flawed, as without a healthy art aspect, a game is not able to entangle us in the experience.
PAGES (10)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

473 users are online: 473 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49063
Welcome our newest member, jennifermary
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM