more commanders.........
I prefer more non-doctrinal units, commanders are lame design
Posts: 954
more commanders.........
Posts: 186
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Posts: 37
Posts: 37
Posts: 130
Pershing would be cool.
Posts: 1217
Butcher started it. Obviously he's running into opponents blessed by the rng gods.Nope, just guys driving up with them to close range into the Tiger. Fire 6 shots while driving faster than the Tigers turret rotation, Tiger down, drive off again. Take a Pak hit (it´s shit now) and get away unharmed.
Posts: 1355
I prefer more non-doctrinal units, commanders are lame design
Posts: 412
Posts: 578
Posts: 32
Same, I want the pershing tank!
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
I wish relic would stop releasing useless garbage commanders.My AT partner seem to enjoy using Tank Hunter Tactics a lot. He doesn't even get a tank. He prefers using his conscripts to thrash things alongside my Riflemen.
You remember the soviet "Tank hunter tactics - commander"?
I have never anybody seen using this crap commander. But relic keeps on spamming bullshit commanders that nobody ever uses.
The whole System is just crap.
Posts: 4928
Considering only like 12 of them were deployed on the western front I don't really like the idea. Then again, there were only about 10 Sturmtigers.
Posts: 1094 | Subs: 20
Map balance/design addressed, commander system overhaul to make it more robust and flexible, and performance issues of coh2 to be seriously looked at.
Not much then eh
Posts: 141
Posts: 374
Posts: 1637
Posts: 32
Thanks for clarifying.
M26 Pershings did not participate in the Battle of the Bulge, but Sturmtigers did.
Posts: 1006
Posts: 927
1 | |||||
935 | |||||
14 | |||||
12 | |||||
1 |