M26 Pershing
- This thread is locked
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedWhat balance issues exists without it? Or will occur if added?
Discuss......
Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Posts: 438
Posts: 760
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedPosts: 222
Posts: 183
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedWhats the Arguments against Pershing? I think they are all pure German Fanboys and angry to lose
Well said!
Posts: 467
Posts: 1108
Posts: 1702
Posts: 656
This thread...
+1
Hasn't this been discussed enough?
Posts: 978
Okay, I´m off to open another buff Panther thread. Cya there!
Posts: 1439
Posts: 4928
Whats the Arguments against Pershing?
Design: The Pershing wasn't used in the Ardennes where the USF design is based around.
Balance: Vehicle Crews and the Jackson, these were designed to make USF formidable without needing a Heavy Tank. Add a Heavy Tank, and you'll need to disable these.
Posts: 467
Posts: 43
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedOnce again, adding a USF heavy tank goes against faction design(which the developers worked/planned) and really isn't needed. United States Army is meant to be flexible and durable, without "elite" units. It's fine as is.
OKW isnt meant to have mediums tanks. Yet a commander lets them field 2 p4's. spare me with the "against faction design" argument.
Posts: 467
Once again, adding a USF heavy tank goes against faction design(which the developers worked/planned) and really isn't needed. United States Army is meant to be flexible and durable, without "elite" units. It's fine as is.]
anything with m1919 is elite. and paras with thompsons too
Livestreams
95 | |||||
2 | |||||
147 | |||||
99 | |||||
25 | |||||
19 | |||||
11 | |||||
6 | |||||
3 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.840223.790+3
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.927408.694+1
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.306114.729+2
- 9.1123623.643+4
- 10.266140.655+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger