M26 Pershing

This thread is locked

New topic

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned

Why would you like it in-game or why not?

What balance issues exists without it? Or will occur if added?

Discuss......

Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5

This has already been discussed to death...

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

This thread...

Posts: 438

not another thread like this yet again.........

Posts: 760

Lol you don't quit do you?

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned

19 Aug 2014, 16:45 PMThe_rEd_bEar

Lol you don't quit do you?

I dont

Posts: 222

When I saw this thread, I tried to guess who the poster might be. I was not wrong.

Posts: 183

Whats the Arguments against Pershing? I think they are all pure German Fanboys and angry to lose

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned

19 Aug 2014, 17:17 PMSteiner500

Whats the Arguments against Pershing? I think they are all pure German Fanboys and angry to lose

Well said!

Posts: 467

I guess you could say I am 'german fanboy' but I wouldn't mind to see Pershing... as long as it is properly balanced. Maybe somewhere between Panther and Tiger in all aspects.

Posts: 1108

19 Aug 2014, 16:40 PMKatitof

This thread...

Posts: 1702

I wouldn't mind seeing the pershing in game, and IT will probaly eventually make it if people ask for it enough.

Posts: 656

19 Aug 2014, 16:40 PMKatitof

This thread...

+1

Hasn't this been discussed enough?

Posts: 978

What is that? Open more threads about the same topic so relic is more likely to change it?

Okay, I´m off to open another buff Panther thread. Cya there!

Posts: 1439

Not this again.

Posts: 4928

19 Aug 2014, 17:17 PMSteiner500

Whats the Arguments against Pershing?

Design: The Pershing wasn't used in the Ardennes where the USF design is based around.

Balance: Vehicle Crews and the Jackson, these were designed to make USF formidable without needing a Heavy Tank. Add a Heavy Tank, and you'll need to disable these.

Posts: 467

couldn't the pershing just not have vehicle crew?

Posts: 43

Once again, adding a USF heavy tank goes against faction design(which the developers worked/planned) and really isn't needed. United States Army is meant to be flexible and durable, without "elite" units. It's fine as is.

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned

20 Aug 2014, 07:18 AMreefermadness

Once again, adding a USF heavy tank goes against faction design(which the developers worked/planned) and really isn't needed. United States Army is meant to be flexible and durable, without "elite" units. It's fine as is.

OKW isnt meant to have mediums tanks. Yet a commander lets them field 2 p4's. spare me with the "against faction design" argument.

Posts: 467

20 Aug 2014, 07:18 AMreefermadness

Once again, adding a USF heavy tank goes against faction design(which the developers worked/planned) and really isn't needed. United States Army is meant to be flexible and durable, without "elite" units. It's fine as is.

]

anything with m1919 is elite. and paras with thompsons too