Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Balance » Was ram nerfed?

Was ram nerfed?

PAGES (1)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
was ram overnerfed?
Option Distribution Votes
36%
64%
Total votes: 56
Vote VOTE! Vote ABSTAIN
buckers
29 Apr 2014, 07:51 AM
#1
avatar of buckers

Posts: 230

EDIT: TITLE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE "WAS RAM OVERNERFED" sorry for the confusion

simple question. please use the poll xoxox

i was playing with t34/76's. my opponent waited for tigers, and sent his first one out. i rammed it three times in the direct back of the tank with three seperate t34's and it never got
'main gun destroyed' crit, it was only ever stunned.

i personally believe it was overnerfed because now T1-T3 builds are completely impossible to use if the opponent goes for tigers. you are forced to backtech to t2 or go to t4 which is incredibly expensive.

did they remove the crit?
is it not calculated by ram direction anymore?

feel free to give your opinions, i want to know if i'm becoming a soviet fanboy or not :(
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
BIG RON
29 Apr 2014, 07:56 AM
#2
avatar of BIG RON
Donator 11

Posts: 172

I don't think it was over nerfed at all I think relic have made ram what it should have been from the very start and that's a last ditch attempt to disable your enemy's tank (which now is random on the type of damage it does) not a free kamikaze guaranteed tank crippling ability.
If I had to take hell, I would use the Australians to take it and the New Zealanders to hold it

- Erwin Rommel
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
WiFiDi
29 Apr 2014, 07:58 AM
#3
avatar of WiFiDi
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3293

the ram was NERFED but really it role was changed more than a flat nerf, that just means you can't use it like you used to.

are you a fanboy, here is the definition so you tell me?
Fanboy is a pejorative term used to describe an individual who is utterly devoted to a single fannish subject, or to a single point of view within that subject, often to the point where it is considered an obsession. Fanboys remain loyal to their particular obsession, disregarding any factors (often including logic) that differ from their point of view.

-random internet user


also the t34 got a pretty big buff this patch so if you are only using it to ram YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG! :P here is the patch notes
:hyper: Failure is always an option. :crazy:
:D It's a happy massacre?! (yes, yes it is!):thumbsup:
:*( Caffeine illegal for WiFi's to ingest in 48 states, 2 colonies, and 1 providences. :hyper:
:lol: To make most awesome thing in universe combine Bears and Nicholas Cage! :lolol:
:P and remember kids, we didn't start the flame-war!:nahnah:
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Omega_Warrior
29 Apr 2014, 08:01 AM
#4
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

Don't know why you need a poll for this. The only correct answer is yes.

Ram
-Currently, ram is being used as a crowd control measure to disable other vehicles. The intent isn’t for a full health T34 to ram other vehicles; instead, ram should be used when the T34 is near death to highlight its usage as a last resort type ability.

-No longer causes instant main gun destroyed critical

-Now has a chance to cause one of the follow criticals to occur: light engine damage, heavy engine damage, immobilization, or main gun destroyed. The chance is weighed such that light engine damage has the highest occurrence where main gun destroyed has the lowest.


In other words it isn't something you shouldn't do unless you have no other option.

Edit: oh you mean overnerfed. In that respect no it isn't. T34s no longer need it to take out larger tanks. They can do that themselves as long as there is atleast two.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
DandyFrontline
29 Apr 2014, 08:02 AM
#5
avatar of DandyFrontline

Posts: 155

There is changelog -_-
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Porygon
29 Apr 2014, 08:04 AM
#6
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

L2R guys.

The topic is "Was ram nerfed", of course it is Yes.

But the poll question is "Was ram overnerfed?" Of course it is No.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Katitof
29 Apr 2014, 08:14 AM
#7
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

Why do you need a pool for that?
Patch notes too hard?
jump backJump back to quoted post25 Nov 2015, 11:09 AM$nuffy
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
GustavGans
29 Apr 2014, 08:20 AM
#8
avatar of GustavGans

Posts: 747

jump backJump back to quoted post29 Apr 2014, 07:51 AMbuckers
simple question. please use the poll xoxox

i was playing with t34/76's. my opponent waited for tigers, and sent his first one out. i rammed it three times in the direct back of the tank with three seperate t34's and it never got
'main gun destroyed' crit, it was only ever stunned.

i personally believe it was overnerfed because now T1-T3 builds are completely impossible to use if the opponent goes for tigers. you are forced to backtech to t2 or go to t4 which is incredibly expensive.

did they remove the crit?
is it not calculated by ram direction anymore?

feel free to give your opinions, i want to know if i'm becoming a soviet fanboy or not :(


To be honest, in my books going solely t1 and t3 has never really been a very rewarding strat unless you went soviet industry or some heavy call-in doc.

Ram feels good the way it is now, especially now that the t-34's been buffed.

Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
buckers
29 Apr 2014, 08:24 AM
#9
avatar of buckers

Posts: 230

sorry guys i was a bit tired when i wrote the topic, yes i'm aware that ram was nerfed... the question is about it being overnerfed.

i'll chuck a edit in :$

embarrassing.. sigh
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
WiFiDi
29 Apr 2014, 08:31 AM
#10
avatar of WiFiDi
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3293

i almost missed then i read the poll question. sorry i can't edit the topic. :(
:hyper: Failure is always an option. :crazy:
:D It's a happy massacre?! (yes, yes it is!):thumbsup:
:*( Caffeine illegal for WiFi's to ingest in 48 states, 2 colonies, and 1 providences. :hyper:
:lol: To make most awesome thing in universe combine Bears and Nicholas Cage! :lolol:
:P and remember kids, we didn't start the flame-war!:nahnah:
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
buckers
29 Apr 2014, 08:32 AM
#11
avatar of buckers

Posts: 230

my fault, don't worry about it
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
bilsantu
29 Apr 2014, 09:46 AM
#12
avatar of bilsantu

Posts: 177

Nope, it's fine. People were abusing it. Send everything to oblivion that is being abused.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Kronosaur0s
29 Apr 2014, 09:50 AM
#13
avatar of Kronosaur0s

Posts: 1701

RAM overnerfed? lolololo
Blaue Division - The best corp

BPX - Black Phoenix, Clan leader.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
OZtheWiZARD
29 Apr 2014, 10:29 AM
#14
avatar of OZtheWiZARD

Posts: 1439

No. I never liked Ram mechanics anyway. Since T-34/76 is a reasonable tank now having old Ram would be a bit too much.
My DeviantArt gallery
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
MilkaCow
29 Apr 2014, 11:34 AM
#15
avatar of MilkaCow

Posts: 577

Dropping dem stats like a bird drops.. well.. u kno

Ram still has 160 penetration.
Ramming the rear of tanks is still better than ramming the front, penetration/armor system was not changed.
Upon a ram the T34 will always get 160 dmg, immobilized and lose it's main gun.
If the ram is successful the opponent will get 160 damage and engine dmg (90%), destroyed engine (5%), immobilized (3%), main gun destroyed (2%).
If the ram is deflected the opponent will get 80 damage and a crew shock.

So ram was nerfed, that much is true, yet also the T34 itself got quite a buff meaning that you rely less on rams. As Peter stated in the changelog, it's a last ditch effort and no longer the go-to weapon to take out German heavy tanks.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
akosi
29 Apr 2014, 14:06 PM
#16
avatar of akosi

Posts: 1734

Permanently Banned
since you will probably lose the t34 after ram, and in this game the key is to keep alive the units, then that ram nerf is pretty huge :S
"I don't need a helmet"
-The guy who really needed a helmet
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Neo
29 Apr 2014, 14:26 PM
#17
avatar of Neo

Posts: 471

Huge nerf but not overnerf. Ram should always have been a last-throw-of-the-dice kind of ability but because Soviet armor was so weak, it was almost the only counter to certain units.

Now the armor balance is better, the old style ram has no place in this game.
Playercard of Neo

1v1: Pstreak: - 1
1v1: Pstreak: + 1
1v1: Pstreak: - 1
1v1: Pstreak: + 1


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Unshavenbackman
29 Apr 2014, 14:38 PM
#18
avatar of Unshavenbackman

Posts: 680

Imo the ram has to do more damage in a way or the other than the maingun. If the ram does less damage than the maingun then it was a overnerf.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Brick Top
29 Apr 2014, 14:48 PM
#19
avatar of Brick Top

Posts: 1168

I think it's alright as it is now. I'm glad to have a better T34. It's still useful for finishing enemy armour which is escaping on a slither. It's also pretty useful when mark target is activated ;)
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
Basilone
29 Apr 2014, 20:21 PM
#20
avatar of Basilone

Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2

I think it was overnerfed a bit but they had the right idea. I think ideally ram should either do heavy engine damage OR weapon damage. Light engine damage isn't a very good trade off, sometimes even a damn AT nade does better than that.

PS: I say that with the expectation that blitzkrieg will be made more useful again.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PAGES (1)down
New topic New topic     Upload replay New Reply
0 user is browsing this thread:
COH2.ORG » Forums » Parlor Room » COH2 Central » COH2 Balance » Was ram nerfed?

SHOUT IT OUT!

No ProfanityNumber of ShoutsRefresh Shout Box
OKSpitfire: You can rage as often as you like btw, you usually manage to make it pretty funny.
Today, 11:18 AM
Rosbone: So it was a systemic failure across multiple disciplines and check points.
Today, 04:30 AM
Rosbone: Knowing how companies work, I imagine a new hire making the menus. The API they are using is complicated and things were hard to figure out. But at some point QA or management should have addressed these things. Usually within 6 months of starting.
Today, 04:29 AM
Rosbone: @theekvn I dont hate Coh3 or Relic. I just dont understand how you work on Coh3 for like 7 years and the menu system is worse than if a Programming 101 student made it. Feel free to explain it to me.
Today, 04:07 AM
theekvn: + 33% dmg rear hit was best deal ever.
Today, 04:00 AM
theekvn: KT just need fuel debuf from 15% to 50%, Ele arc of fire- aim time improve and they are good to go
Today, 03:59 AM
theekvn: and please Rosbone,I know you hate Coh3 to the bone due to your drama with relic, Still, Can you give a proper point of view instead of raging ?.
Today, 03:54 AM
theekvn: you rather go 76 to unity Whizbang 2.0 or go home.
Today, 03:52 AM
theekvn: also US tier 4 is 145f and Sherman pen 140 nerf is too much.
Today, 03:52 AM
theekvn: Whizbang lock behind CP, meanwhile stuka is techtree progress
Today, 03:51 AM
KoRneY: @aerafield It's possible that it is underpriced for what it is capable of now, no need to go full retard and take it immediately as a massive problem. It costs 60 more MP than a pz.3 and in 2v2 the barrage can be quite strong.
Last Friday, 19:14 PM
OKSpitfire: I do like that they made the Stuka more expensive instead of nerfing it into the ground though. Found it pretty unsatisfying to use before that buff a while back....
Last Thursday, 16:35 PM
aerafield: USF already is by far the shittiest faction in terms of countering blobbing and turtling, now they supposedly have one overtuned tool locked behind a BG and it's immediately a massive problem?
Last Thursday, 13:33 PM
Lady Xenarra: I think post-2.0 Whizbang buffs, the price is too low esp since the Stuka got nerfed in cost too. Speaking of which, how exactly is one supposed to successfully dive this Sherman in disguise? Med tank spam running into SSFs?
Last Thursday, 12:13 PM
OKSpitfire: A powerful, doctrinal unit that outperforms stock stuff? Colour me shocked! :P
Last Thursday, 10:49 AM
Willy Pete: Cool you wanna lose your stock lategame arty too then?
Last Thursday, 03:20 AM
Lady Xenarra: WTB Whizzbang for DAK instead of Stuka, 5 fuel cheape, 60MP more expensive and next to impossible to dive. :rofl:
05 Mar 2025, 20:27 PM
Rosbone: It is also hard to expect Relic to help Coh2 when they cant even make working menus in Coh3 yet, 2 years after release and at full price+ for DLCs. Thats like asking a fish to do calculus.
04 Mar 2025, 02:58 AM
Rosbone: But this last patch has made good progress for grabbing players. All we can hope is Coh3 gets to Coh2s quality level before everyone abandons the franchise. Its Relic so they will completely f*%k it up as usual. But its a hope/cope.
04 Mar 2025, 02:55 AM
Rosbone: Relic wants Coh2 to fail so players will migrate to Coh3. It is hard to blame them since Coh3 sucks so bad. It needs all the help it can get.
04 Mar 2025, 02:53 AM

Livestreams

ScoppiaInzi
 unknown 14

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
13
 Download
Download
1337
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

662 users are online: 662 guests
9 posts in the last 24h
26 posts in the last week
66 posts in the last month
Registered members: 52518
Welcome our newest member, Mccollns85
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM