On the one had it would be a shame if it would be removed entirely on the other hand it often is just a game winning dice roll that says "Garden you" to one side (just had a game where my enemies light vehicle got abandoned two times in a row)
Why not make it so that abandonment can happen but only under special circumstances like with M10 or Sturmtiger but that it will happen 100% in those cases?
Vehicle gets killed by other Tank, AT gun or AT rifle --> 0% chance of abandon
Vehicle is using a ability that gives it some extra speed for some time and it hits a mine --> 100% chance of abdanon
Proposal regarding "Abandoned vehicles"
16 Jul 2021, 06:04 AM
#1
Posts: 518
Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.
Playing with randoms
Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.
I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you
The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not
Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.
I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you
I don't play this version of EZ mode very often because it's so boringly simple. But it is funny to see the Axis circle jerk with people complaining that the one faction with every crutch in the book is some how underpowered lol.
The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not
Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.
u deserve to lose if u don't have an Ele when there's an ISU.
Just stay out of topics u have no knowledge of, Latch.
Ranked, I only play USF. Wouldn't be caught dead playing Nazis with some sort of record being taken
I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you, and wouldn't be surprised to be hit again, but I'm fed up with this bullshit and honestly, the sole fact that I'm not permad is what keeps me here having discussions about the game I like and yes, I do question myself why I still go back here to this free range insane asylum so often.
I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you
16 Jul 2021, 06:12 AM
#2
Posts: 3145 | Subs: 2
I think it was too RNG dependent and that's why they removed it.
Which is kind of sad losing on a realistic feature but the competitive crowd get a bigger say I guess.
Which is kind of sad losing on a realistic feature but the competitive crowd get a bigger say I guess.
16 Jul 2021, 06:59 AM
#3
Posts: 999 | Subs: 1
for sp i'm all for abandon to return. for mp... not so much for obvious reasons, unless the mechanic itself is getting a major overhaul (e.g. a percentage of the unit's fuel/mp cost for recovery). but i'd rather have some of the minor criticals like gunner/ loader injured or pintle gunner killed to make a comeback. these are imho more easy to balance properly and not complete gamechangers in some situations.
||| ScatterThis! - Tank AI calculation made easy ||| CoH2 Pen Calc - Tank vs tank... who wins against who and by what margin? |||
16 Jul 2021, 07:00 AM
#4
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
I noticed that the paratroopers cannot crash when parachuting. I understand why they did it, but for me such things make the game more insipid.
16 Jul 2021, 07:12 AM
#5
Posts: 1794
I noticed that the paratroopers cannot crash when parachuting. I understand why they did it, but for me such things make the game more insipid.
wow that got removed?
one worry is those 70 community members advising relic, how many are 1v1 players we know from here?
so many of them removed all the bright ideas in name of THEIR competitive prize money desires...
abandoned needs to come back for mp
16 Jul 2021, 07:20 AM
#6
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
wow that got removed?
one worry is those 70 community members advising relic, how many are 1v1 players we know from here?
so many of them removed all the bright ideas in name of THEIR competitive prize money desires...
abandoned needs to come back for mp
A switch is enough to play a competitive game or play a regular game. On|off abandoned tanks, etc.
16 Jul 2021, 07:27 AM
#7
Posts: 1794
A switch is enough to play a competitive game or play a regular game. On|off abandoned tanks, etc.
nope it won't. remember coldtech? a switch means abandoned will not get any more tweaks
16 Jul 2021, 11:06 AM
#8
Posts: 1594
I can't say I'm sad to see abandons gone, if the alternative was to implement them the same way as in CoH2. (I.E; RNG garbage)
Though this is just a pre-alpha campaign slice, I expect things will work rather differently in Multiplayer. (its also possible many systems simply arent implemented yet.)
Though this is just a pre-alpha campaign slice, I expect things will work rather differently in Multiplayer. (its also possible many systems simply arent implemented yet.)
16 Jul 2021, 12:23 PM
#9
Posts: 956
100% agree with this, do not fully remove, just make it trigger under specific circumstances
Same should BTW be for dropped weapon upgrades (for example if the squad suffered explosive or flame damage five seconds before death, it gets obliterated along with its weapon, but if the killing blows were from small arms, it will drop)
Same should BTW be for dropped weapon upgrades (for example if the squad suffered explosive or flame damage five seconds before death, it gets obliterated along with its weapon, but if the killing blows were from small arms, it will drop)
"Nice. Very impressive. Now let´s see Paul Allen´s playercard."
16 Jul 2021, 20:09 PM
#10
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Abandoned vehicles should have way more HP (a different HP pool that can't be repaired), it should take resources to recrew them -both repairs and mp/fuel- (at least for light tanks and heavier) and happen when only certain conditions are met. Still RNG but a much higher % than currently on COH2.
Rather than been a free gift it should be a fighting point.
Considering vehicles categories:
-Light vehicles: only with small arm, no cost to recrew.
-Light tanks and HT: only when snared/Infantry based AT. Still cost resources to recrew but only 25%
-Mediums and higher: cost between 25%/50%. Only triggers when the vehicle already has a critical effect (maybe only from rear shots)
Indirect fire nor offmap can't trigger abandoned vehicles.
Rather than been a free gift it should be a fighting point.
Considering vehicles categories:
-Light vehicles: only with small arm, no cost to recrew.
-Light tanks and HT: only when snared/Infantry based AT. Still cost resources to recrew but only 25%
-Mediums and higher: cost between 25%/50%. Only triggers when the vehicle already has a critical effect (maybe only from rear shots)
Indirect fire nor offmap can't trigger abandoned vehicles.
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
16 Jul 2021, 20:58 PM
#11
Posts: 589
I think it is sad that abandons are removed, this is the type of thing that makes a COH match exciting and unique. if you support your tanks/vehicles it is not that difficult to destroy the abandoned vehicle before the enemy can crew it. it punishes diving too deep if you aren't careful.
16 Jul 2021, 21:05 PM
#12
Posts: 210
I always felt it sort of lingered on the back of everyone's mind to not send in suicide vehicles in risk of them being captured. Otherwise, not feeling that strong with it one way or another. Abandons were incredibly rare anyways to the point where it really has no impact on the actual gameplay.
16 Jul 2021, 22:17 PM
#13
Posts: 1594
I think it is sad that abandons are removed, this is the type of thing that makes a COH match exciting and unique. if you support your tanks/vehicles it is not that difficult to destroy the abandoned vehicle before the enemy can crew it. it punishes diving too deep if you aren't careful.
Noo it doesn't. It rewards turtling as much as it "punishes" diving. It's far too swingy a mechanic to be RNG. The same function is already performed by the armour/accuracy system without adding yet another set of dicerolls.
RNG abandons are a terrible mechanic and I am not even slightly sad to see them go.
16 Jul 2021, 23:36 PM
#14
Posts: 83
If its considered too RNG, why not have AT infantry have an paid tech up ability to try and kill the vehicle crew when the vehicle is at say 5% HP with a long global cooldown for all these type of infantry.
You could even remove the RNG chance completely with the vehicle owner having a scuttle option to add counter play it or lose the vehicle. Having both sides needing to make an action.
You could even remove the RNG chance completely with the vehicle owner having a scuttle option to add counter play it or lose the vehicle. Having both sides needing to make an action.
17 Jul 2021, 06:14 AM
#15
Posts: 518
Why is my idea considered to be too much RNG by some? (serious question)
like elchinos idea btw. Having to spend fuel / ammo to recerew might help fixing it too
like elchinos idea btw. Having to spend fuel / ammo to recerew might help fixing it too
Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.
Playing with randoms
Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.
I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you
The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not
Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.
I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you
I don't play this version of EZ mode very often because it's so boringly simple. But it is funny to see the Axis circle jerk with people complaining that the one faction with every crutch in the book is some how underpowered lol.
The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not
Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.
u deserve to lose if u don't have an Ele when there's an ISU.
Just stay out of topics u have no knowledge of, Latch.
Ranked, I only play USF. Wouldn't be caught dead playing Nazis with some sort of record being taken
I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you, and wouldn't be surprised to be hit again, but I'm fed up with this bullshit and honestly, the sole fact that I'm not permad is what keeps me here having discussions about the game I like and yes, I do question myself why I still go back here to this free range insane asylum so often.
I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you
17 Jul 2021, 06:40 AM
#16
Posts: 194
Just make captured enemy vehicles some kind of restricted.
Since they are crewed by foreign and untrained soldiers (regular Infantry, not tank crews), they will suffer a debuff, like slower fire rate, but can be upgrade to remove it (Manpower and Fuel, about 20% of original cost)
Since they are crewed by foreign and untrained soldiers (regular Infantry, not tank crews), they will suffer a debuff, like slower fire rate, but can be upgrade to remove it (Manpower and Fuel, about 20% of original cost)
17 Jul 2021, 06:46 AM
#17
Posts: 518
Just make captured enemy vehicles some kind of restricted.
Since they are crewed by foreign and untrained soldiers (regular Infantry, not tank crews), they will suffer a debuff, like slower fire rate, but can be upgrade to remove it (Manpower and Fuel, about 20% of original cost)
But then the problem of your enemy getting his tank / light vehicle abandoned in his territory after you dive in to kill it still remains
But yea. Could be added on top of that too
Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.
Playing with randoms
Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.
I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you
The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not
Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.
I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you
I don't play this version of EZ mode very often because it's so boringly simple. But it is funny to see the Axis circle jerk with people complaining that the one faction with every crutch in the book is some how underpowered lol.
The idea that the Jackson needed ANY nerfing is so laughable. It only serves ONE task, how dare it be good at that. If it were a good against infantry like the Panther, King Tiger, Panzer IV, Jagtiger, Elefant, I could see how it might be a problem and need a nerf but it's not
Haha the votes on this alone show the euro synphatheizers feel they just deserve to win. Anytime an okw nerf is brought up. Brain dead faction that skilless people can play and i refuse to play because of it.
u deserve to lose if u don't have an Ele when there's an ISU.
Just stay out of topics u have no knowledge of, Latch.
Ranked, I only play USF. Wouldn't be caught dead playing Nazis with some sort of record being taken
I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you, and wouldn't be surprised to be hit again, but I'm fed up with this bullshit and honestly, the sole fact that I'm not permad is what keeps me here having discussions about the game I like and yes, I do question myself why I still go back here to this free range insane asylum so often.
I've talked with mods enough times, I know when I'm going overboard, I usually limit myself, but there is only so much tolerance I have for entitled, ignorant fucks like you
17 Jul 2021, 10:10 AM
#18
Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2
To add to Elchino's idea, it could be implemented that an abandoned vehicle has to be repaired first above a certain threshold, afterwards you need to pay resources to get the unit.
This would delay the time until the vehicle is captured. So if you lose the fight and your vehicle abandons, you have some more time for a counter push. Special abilities like 'repair critical' would also not be able to cheese the abandon by instantly repairing the engine.
It would also make sense logically. The vehicle got abandoned because the normal crew can't fix it. Therefore you need pios first to fix the critical damage before it can be recrewed again.
Maybe it should always be abandoned after being immobilized first. This would give more depth to immobilizing abilities like mines or whatever CoH3 will have. Pioneers and AT squads should also maybe have an ability to instantly destroy an abandoned vehicle
This would delay the time until the vehicle is captured. So if you lose the fight and your vehicle abandons, you have some more time for a counter push. Special abilities like 'repair critical' would also not be able to cheese the abandon by instantly repairing the engine.
It would also make sense logically. The vehicle got abandoned because the normal crew can't fix it. Therefore you need pios first to fix the critical damage before it can be recrewed again.
Maybe it should always be abandoned after being immobilized first. This would give more depth to immobilizing abilities like mines or whatever CoH3 will have. Pioneers and AT squads should also maybe have an ability to instantly destroy an abandoned vehicle
17 Jul 2021, 11:06 AM
#19
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
it should take resources to recrew them -both repairs and mp/fuel
Honestly, unless you make it cost 70-90% of the initial resource cost, being able to recrew enemy vehicles just swings the game too much for an RNG mechanic. Recrewing enemy vehicles on the spot and then have them perform regularly hardly makes sense logically/historically, it would take time to figure stuff out and get used to.
At worst, captured abandoned vehicles should also have significant combat penalties like -25% to -50% of everything (mobility, reload, accuracy, etc.). Again as a means to lessen the impact on a game.
But I'd rather just see recrewing removed in total. I think it would be better if abandoned vehicles simply couldn't be recrewed anymore but instead could be siphoned/salvaged by engineers for some extra resources (in CoH2 terms maybe 50 ammo and 30 fuel tops). Make the process take quite some time so the wreck has to be properly secured first. On the front lines this would still have the desired effect of creating a random and sudden extra objective to fight over and secure. If it happens behind your/enemy lines then you or the enemy are/is lucky, but a relatively small amount of resources isn't going to swing a game.
17 Jul 2021, 12:19 PM
#20
Posts: 1594
Honestly, unless you make it cost 70-90% of the initial resource cost, being able to recrew enemy vehicles just swings the game too much for an RNG mechanic. Recrewing enemy vehicles on the spot and then have them perform regularly hardly makes sense logically/historically, it would take time to figure stuff out and get used to.
At worst, captured abandoned vehicles should also have significant combat penalties like -25% to -50% of everything (mobility, reload, accuracy, etc.). Again as a means to lessen the impact on a game.
But I'd rather just see recrewing removed in total. I think it would be better if abandoned vehicles simply couldn't be recrewed anymore but instead could be siphoned/salvaged by engineers for some extra resources (in CoH2 terms maybe 50 ammo and 30 fuel tops). Make the process take quite some time so the wreck has to be properly secured first. On the front lines this would still have the desired effect of creating a random and sudden extra objective to fight over and secure. If it happens behind your/enemy lines then you or the enemy are/is lucky, but a relatively small amount of resources isn't going to swing a game.
Unsurprisingly; I totally agree.
I like the idea of replacing the recrewing of abandoned vehicles with the ability to salvage resources from them specifically... Though I'd still want to tie the "salvageable" status to some specific type of death (Snares, probably) rather than that also being an RNG mechanic.
Dependent on how many resources you might get from the wreck, this might still be a little too swingy though, and still has the problem of too severely punishing aggressive play, and rewarding turtling, y'know?
Incidentally: Perhaps this is an NDA deal, but are you and the rest of the Balans Teem part of this "roundtable" thing for CoH3? If so, I hope things are looking promising!
EDIT:
Why is my idea considered to be too much RNG by some? (serious question)
It isnt, people are referring to the current state of the Abandon mechanic.
0 user is browsing this thread:
Livestreams
 |
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
33 | ||
 |
|
|
11 | ||
 |
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.35258.859+1
- 4.939410.696+5
- 5.599234.719+7
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1265
Board Info
802 users are online:
802 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
12 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49989
Welcome our newest member, LegalMetrologyConsul
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, LegalMetrologyConsul
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM