Posts: 1289
the strength of soviet mortar is the 6 man and cons merge so it can outlast ost mortar in 4v4 games
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
the strength of soviet mortar is the 6 man and cons merge so it can outlast ost mortar in 4v4 games
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1794
Merging into the mortar is a waste of mp. You loose more mp then its worth.
One 240 mp mortar to needs a 240 mp squad to stand any chance dispite that it should already outlast the counterpart.... this means the ost mortar is op or the soviet one up.
All jokes aside mortars arent meant to dual eachother. Just as mg's arent.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
in 4v4 you can always encounter mortar spammer.
in fact, even 2v2 you can get mortar meme plays. and in a direct mortar dualing, sov mortar edges it ime
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1794
Posts: 1289
the point i am saying is sov mortar is now hardly worse mortar against ost one and putting flare back to vet1 seems fine
Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2
Soviet mortar can't win vs ost mortar vet1 onwards, because counterbarrage outranges it.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
That's a good point if you want your mortar to barrage Katys and Calliopes 80% of the time.
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2
Well, you aren't going to be seeing these around the time frame where mortars are relevant.
Posts: 1273
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Perhaps OffTopic: Does CB on Mortars have the same "feature" as CB on artillery pieces?
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2
Perhaps OffTopic: Does CB on Mortars have the same "feature" as CB on artillery pieces?
Posts: 246
UA
soviets
Posts: 1515
People like to cry and complain about everything when most of the problems are on a personal level. Mortar Flare is fine in my opinion. First if the Soviet player has Mortars then they went with a T-2 opening and against OKW....definitely a L2P issue here. You can do the same thing with IR Halftrack or JLI cloaked to give you sight which btw does not cost ammunition or require a mortar which will not last to end game once Stuka or Panzerwerfer hits the field.
Either way this is a non issue compared to Spec OPs global flare. It requires a Support Unit which...does supporting abilities or do we want to go back to Precision Strike?
Posts: 1116 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1289
Posts: 1794
Flares of soviet already are short lived. Just a few seconds. Any less would be overkill imo.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
it's quite long and uncounterable. that's the issue
late game, you can build 1 mortar for cheap maphack for rocket arty or su85 isu152 spotting, at vet0...
ost 222 had to get vet2 for increase sight...
Maybe it's 'cause the Axis players aren't a bunch of forum crybabies, and they keep their cool and fight the uphill battle, unlike some of their "allied" counterparts.
Posts: 1289
it's quite long and uncounterable. that's the issue
late game, you can build 1 mortar for cheap maphack for rocket arty or su85 isu152 spotting, at vet0...
ost 222 had to get vet2 for increase sight...
Posts: 318
 |
|
|
69 | ||
|
|
|
|
42 | ||
 |
|
|
31 | ||
|
|
|
|
19 | ||
 |
|
|
12 | ||
|
|
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
627 | ||
|
|
|
|
11 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
