Should the SU85's vision ability be nerfed/removed
Posts: 1563
Even though I consider the SU85 to be the most balanced TD out of all of them this still bothers me a little. I think this vision ability should be removed or at least nerfed. This units weakness is that it need combined arms but the ability makes it self sufficient. Now that the soviet pop cap efficiency is a thing I think this ability should be looked at a bit.
Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2
Posts: 1289
Thats enough drawbacks for the single upside it gives to get an extra shot off.
So imo no it shoudnt be touched.
Posts: 1563
The vision ability just got nerfed in the patch to 65 vision range.
True, but a little less being self sufficient would be nice. But idk I just asked a question.
Posts: 3114 | Subs: 2
True, but a little less being self sufficient would be nice. But idk I just asked a question.
I personally think it is fine now.
Previously it could spot easily for the Katyusha, it is good that this is patched out. Now it basically spots for itself, but it is also the most vulnerable TD that Allies have plus the T34 can often not effectively block a break through attempt to flank the SU85.
I'd leave it as is.
Posts: 1273
Posts: 956
tl;dr: Seems fine to me now.
Posts: 615
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Although what i suggested in the past was basically converted into a commander ability (Ambush from Dank Hunters)
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
A SU-85 with focus sight/tracking has better los than IRHT...
The ability should me move to vet 1, (SU-85 has little reason to have trucking to begin with) and become timed instead of toggle.
Posts: 1289
Focused vision should be changed since it stacks with tracking and Soviet already have great reckon tools.
A SU-85 with focus sight/tracking has better los than IRHT...
The ability should me move to vet 1, (SU-85 has little reason to have trucking to begin with) and become timed instead of toggle.
I disagree, soviets have most stock recon tools/abilities indeed but they are not passive like spotting scopes, they effect t70 and su85 in a negative way or cost muni per timed use, unlike spotting scopes pio's or volks sight when in cover.
The su85 is considered the most balanced td by a lot of players, we dont need to lock a non problem behind vet. The stacking effect of focused sight and tracking is less strong because of the speed penalty focused sight gives along with it having a cooldown, wich can effect is survivability just as the speed debuff can.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
I disagree, soviets have most stock recon tools/abilities indeed but they are not passive like spotting scopes, they effect t70 and su85 in a negative way or cost muni per timed use, unlike spotting scopes pio's or volks sight when in cover.
The stock ability of SU-85 can be justified by spotting scope which is doctrinal ability and not that great unless on vetted reckon vehicle.
The su85 is considered the most balanced td by a lot of players, we dont need to lock a non problem behind vet. The stacking effect of focused sight and tracking is less strong because of the speed penalty focused sight gives along with it having a cooldown, wich can effect is survivability just as the speed debuff can.
Su-85 has not reason to have trucking as is vet 1 ability, it does need the extra sight nor the mini map info.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
The stock ability of SU-85 can be justified by spotting scope which is doctrinal ability and not that great unless on vetted reckon vehicle.
That is factually incorrect.
40% sight increase -IS- that great on all units that have sight.
Its batshit insane on unvetted recon vehicles.
Its legit map hack on vetted recon vehicles.
Su-85 has not reason to have trucking as is vet 1 ability, it does need the extra sight nor the mini map info.
Why?
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
That is factually incorrect.
40% sight increase -IS- that great on all units that have sight.
Its batshit insane on unvetted recon vehicles.
Its legit map hack on vetted recon vehicles.
Feel free to start a thread about scoping scopes if you want to talk about them.
Why?
Because a TD should not have an ability that is a better versions of the 222's"Infantry Awareness" ability.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
Because a TD should not have an ability that is a better versions of the 222's"Infantry Awareness" ability.
But why?
"because they shouldn't have it and there exist completely unrelated ability on completely different vehicle in opposing faction" is not a reason really.
Livestreams
19 | |||||
18 | |||||
18 | |||||
11 | |||||
3 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1101614.642+2
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.271108.715+22
- 8.721440.621+3
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, kavyashide
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM