Profile of Australian Magic

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198105012992


Thread: Jackson needs a slight buff11 Jan 2015, 13:42 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2015, 13:10 PMKatitof Why wouldn't they? Why people act like panther/tiger/KT/ele/JT had some kind of black hole eating all shells going in frontally and are surprised when these get penned by AT? There is 37% chance they will. Such TD, much power. Once in 1v1 my almost dead E8 bounced pak40 shell. It was only 1 bounce from my E8. I was so surprised when this guy has complained about that bounce. Like his Tigers were not bouncing 57mm and E8 all the time. This is showing Axis players attitude "my tanks should have godmode, but yours can not bounce my shells" In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: stug E assault tank11 Jan 2015, 11:55 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2015, 11:38 AMMackie ostheer teching is too expensive plain and simple All you need to do is to switch tech cost with building cost but I think it's too hard for relic to do this In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jackson needs a slight buff11 Jan 2015, 11:49 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2015, 11:23 AMausterlitz Panther's don't have 60 range and 240 dmg.And KT plus panther is too costly to have.Jackson at 125 fuel is easy with pershing. King Tiger + Jadgpanzer Sturmtiger + Jadgpanzer Panther + Jadgpanzer Panther + Jadgtiger Panther + Elephnat Tiger + Panther Everything within 1 faction so why USF can get Pershing and Jackson? You have 240dmg and 60 range but no armor, low hp, medium penetration. On the other hand you hvae 160dmg, 60 trange, great armor and very good penetration (Jadgpanzer). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Tiger Ace11 Jan 2015, 11:43 AM Tiger Ace is fine. In fact I don't see any difference when dealing with regular Tiger or Tiger Ace. I'm more scared of Elephant than Tiger Ace, really. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: stug E assault tank11 Jan 2015, 11:35 AM At gun, at gun, at gun... Nothing more. I find this doctrine as little OP because you don't have to tech. Just get Pak40 and that's all. It has everything you need. Early game close combat infantry, PzGrens in transporter (this is awesome, drive behind enemy lines and wipe all crew weapons), Stug, Off map arty, Tiger. It has everything you need. I think there is no other so useful and complete doctrine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: soviet t3 and t4 cost issues....10 Jan 2015, 18:51 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jan 2015, 18:12 PMdaspoulos Even for tier pricing t34s can still come out at the 10-11 minute mark. Ever think about that? And the fun begins when 3mins later OKW can deploy Panther In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger or Panther?10 Jan 2015, 18:29 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jan 2015, 18:15 PMG4bb4_G4nd4lf Tiger armor: 300 Panther armor: 320 Penetration near/mid/far Panther: 260.0/240.0/220.0 Tiger: 220.0/200.0/180.0 Range: Tiger: 40 Panther: 50 Now, tell me which one is better vs tanks, huh? Firstly, Panther has 320 but when reach vet 2. Secondly, it's about dealing with tanks but what about ZiS? How your Panther with deal with them? Tiger has 1040hp, Panther 800. What about rear armor? Tiger has a chance to bounce Sherman or T34 shells. Tiger is all-in-one. It can deal with t34, IS2, Shermans, infatry, at gun. Panther can deal only with vehicles so you have to spend more pop cap for infantry. 3 Tigers can roll out whole army. 3 Panthers can do nothing against at guns. And Tiger reloads faster. In: Lobby
Thread: Reinforced Wire. Why....?10 Jan 2015, 15:07 PM OKW's wire on Trois-Points and the graveyard... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger or Panther?10 Jan 2015, 09:49 AM Elephnat Ok, but really, Tiger, always. I'm going for Panther only if I'm using luftwaffe or close air support but most of the time Tiger. Slower, lower range but it's good vs everything on the other hand Panther has problems vs infantry. In: Lobby
Thread: Why Do You Lose Games?10 Jan 2015, 01:02 AM By losing VPs... Many times I'm pushing so hard in late game but I lose because of VPs.. In: Lobby