Profile of Cabreza

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 656

General Information


Thread: Centaur14 Sep 2015, 19:13 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Sep 2015, 13:14 PMKatitof Anyway, I wouldn't mind it being tad less effective if it was faster, thing murders puppchens mercilessly. +1 to that. You can just drive up to puppchens and murder them from the front. It's kind of hilarious how easily they go down. I'm entirely fine with an AI vehicle being strong but it shouldn't be decrewing AT weapons that easily. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Base Reorganization Concept13 Sep 2015, 05:00 AM Very nice base design Someguy. I definitely prefer it to the current one. In: Lobby
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/09/201510 Sep 2015, 21:37 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2015, 21:17 PMAlexzandvar The .50 doesn't have more received accuracy than any other weapons team Ah, I'm glad that got fixed. Then the only problem with the .50 HMG is the insane reinforce cost of the crew due to the weapon having no MP cost. In: Lobby
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/09/201510 Sep 2015, 21:00 PM Thank you for your ongoing responses in these threads Brad. Do you plan to fix the USF .50 MG? Currently the USF .50 MG is suffering from two distinct problems. The first problem is that the weapon itself has no MP cost so the crew costs an inordinate amount of MP (35) to reinforce. All other MGs and set-up weapons have an MP cost associated with the weapon that reduces the reinforcement cost of the crew. The second problem is that the weapon team for the USF .50 MG has 25% more received accuracy than any other weapon team. This makes the .50 MG the easiest MG in the game to decrew. These two problems combined cause the USF .50 to bleed horrendous amounts of MP to the point it is practically impossible to use. Edit: Looks like the 25% received accuracy was fixed so only the high reinforce as a result of the weapon having no MP cost needs to be fixed. In: Lobby
Thread: eta/rumor of preview mod goin live ?9 Sep 2015, 20:08 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 19:40 PMSwift Starts on Saturday 19th September for the opening qualifiers. That would give us an ETA of sometime next week. I would certainly like what kind of effect the balance patch has on the tourney. In: Lobby
Thread: Should the USF AT gun recieve a buff?9 Sep 2015, 20:04 PM Either AP rounds need to be cheaper so they can be used every engagement or the USF AT gun needs greater pen so that AP rounds are more of a bonus instead of a necessity when fighting heavy armor. Personally I favor just increasing the pen on the gun since making AP rounds cheaper with the assumption that they will always be needed just represents unnecessary micro every fight and could cause the AT gun to overperform if the ability is cheap enough. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Brace in Balance Preview Mod9 Sep 2015, 19:59 PM At the very least emplacements need to be more resistant to indirect fire or have greater health. What if instead of stopping the emplacement from firing entirely brace instead reduced damage taken by half while reducing the RoF or the emplacement by half? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/08/20159 Sep 2015, 09:01 AM Gonna play devils advocate here but if the Tiger is 45 range stock and 50 range at vet 2 why shouldn't the IS2 also be 45 range stock and 50 range at vet 2? In: Lobby
Thread: Why use t34/76?9 Sep 2015, 04:48 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2015, 03:33 AMMr. Someguy 8 was a bit low, when you consider that a it had the same pop cap as a Panzergrenadier squad. The Stug is also 8 pop, costs 10 fuel more than the T34/76, and the case could be made that it performs its role far better T34/76 currently does. The reason 8 pop seems appropriate for the T34/76's current performance is that it results in a ratio of 3 T34/76s (24 pop total @ 8 pop) to every 2 P4s (24 pop total @ 12 pop). This also works out price wise (900MP/240FU for the T34s and 700MP/250FU for the P4s) and combat wise since 3 T34/76s are about what you need to take on 2 P4s. If you bump the pop to 10 then you have the same ratios but the Wher player has an extra 6 pop to spare for what is essentially an equal combat force. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why use t34/76?9 Sep 2015, 03:29 AM I liked the T34/76 a lot more when it was 8 pop in the balance mod. At 10 pop it's a bit harder to justify the cost/performance per pop ratio. Perhaps the T34/76 needs a bit of a cost/performance increase to justify the increase in pop. In: COH2 Balance