Profile of braciszek

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 2053

General Information
Steam: 76561198027972381


Thread: M36- badly underpowered?5 Dec 2014, 22:09 PM If you try to aim at anything larger than a panzer IV at max range, you surely wont penetrate. :/ (well, you might, but you'll spend a dozen or so shots to kill and the enemy sure aint going to take it) You get closer to try to improve your chance to deal damage, and you die. Very fun and amazing indeed... And so i would like to think a little more durability could be in order. (Vet 0 AP rounds could actually do it, dealing a lot of damage isnt that scary unless the shot actually penetrates) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M36- badly underpowered?5 Dec 2014, 06:48 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2014, 06:26 AMferwiner Think of it otherwise: no other faction gets solid mobile AT that cheap. Im excluding su-85 as it lacks penetration and is even more disadvantaged by blitz ability due to lack of turret. Dont throw the SU-85 under the bus just yet. Su-85 has better long range penetration than the Jackson at no vet, great accuracy, the ability to spot for itself, and very fast reload with vet also make the SU-85 somewhat viable in the game. Jackson could get more penetration, especially with HVAP rounds, but... Soviets have the all mighty anti-all mine, which CE's can place and be easily replaced if they die compared to the m20, which is risky to place mines where needed. Actually, i would appreciate the Jackson more if USF had some sort of light mine that at least slightly slowed down the enemy... The biggest offender for the Jackson could be its mobility, but i would think it would be its health. No other faction has to rely completely on an AT option that gets slaughtered as easily, especially in the volk schreck meta... There would be ways to make the Jackson look better without actually touching the Jackson, but we'll have to see what Relic does to the meta... Something that costs more usually means there is more bang for its buck, and the reality is, 10-30 fuel more on a Jackson isnt really going to stall USF's ability to make it. Its does not have that big of a degree of cheapness to be considered advantageous for its lower price. Realistically thinking, im not expecting any changes for it, but given USF design and AT effectiveness and availability compared to the AT of every other faction, the Jackson isnt that great. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M36- badly underpowered?5 Dec 2014, 06:19 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2014, 06:10 AMferwiner and that will take all the AT firepower the us have so it's much better as it is. I think its kind of distressing that the Jackson is the only USF stock AT option that can even think of scratching anything bigger than a panzer IV. Unfortunately, enemy tanks outrun it, especially with blitz, which does not bode well with it being one of the most fragile tanks in the game... More damage for being disadvantaged in nearly everything else but a turret isnt exactly a well designed combination i would like to think... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Canister shot5 Dec 2014, 01:31 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2014, 00:55 AMDakkaIsMagic So... anyone going recon is not going to use the I&R pathfinders to tip the next few engagements in there favor? Well... Who uses I&R pathfinders anyways? And USF isnt going to spend its early munitions on its abilities, anyways... :/ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: When I get the oneshot squadwipe with the ISU5 Dec 2014, 01:28 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Dec 2014, 00:35 AMStrummingbird Go big or go home Oh man... XD In: Lobby
Thread: Canister shot4 Dec 2014, 22:55 PM The super paratrooper drop to me seems like an inefficient variation of Airborne's paratroopers. For... What is it again, 900 mp? Which calls in two paratroopers with random munitions costing weapons (mostly good) and an unmanned AT gun... The ability would certainly be used more if an AT gun didnt make it cost way more than an ability should cost (as in, an AT gun kind of doesnt need to be included). Other than the greyhound (which is only good for nuke cannister), everything else is extremely... Meh. Why choose it over any of the other 5 commanders? Im certainly for a revision of the commander. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF pop cap4 Dec 2014, 22:49 PM MP bleed is what falters high popcap armies, anyways. Might as well since a decent amount of USF's popcap goes to clutter you kind of need around... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tiger Ace4 Dec 2014, 21:54 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2014, 20:16 PMMr. Someguy Take into account the fact that the Turret MG having double damage still does less DPS than the regular Top MG alone. It's MG abilities still arem't as powerful as a normal Tiger. Given the firepower of the main gun, the damage of the mg isnt that important... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Highfive's guide on how to suggest changes4 Dec 2014, 14:00 PM I would like to think that we do have some fake diversity in this game with the few units that Relic wont make useful and takes up space. Like the SU-76, what is that even for... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Whats wrong with coh 24 Dec 2014, 04:08 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Dec 2014, 00:30 AMgokkel Blame the design of the WFA armies. They hardly have much choice right now. Not that Soviets and Ostheer players are not blobbing either. Extremely true, its kind of hard to expect any other sort of stat from factions that were designed with one main infantry for nearly everything while having not so great support weapons that are trapped behind commanders/teching. Soviets and Ostheer kind of followed suit. In: COH2 Balance