AND this where you don't understand the general mentality of the pop. It's the perceived problem of "unfairness". You'll be surprise that there are more people who prefer to win in an old fashioned way, than losing trying something different.
It's not about having money on the line, what matters or not depends on each individual. It's simple, if presented by the choice of having an iwin button at the reach of their hand, they'll use it even if it's "unfair" for their opponent. You just have to see how many people used the Tiger Ace for the 4 months it was on the wild. You just have to see how many people use Artillery cover, CalliOP, or whatever FOTM.
I agree but it still doesnt mean that player will loose more matches becouse balance is not perfect, there some bugs present or he didn't buy dlc. He will just play against different people than he would in a perfect world but still with about 50% winrate. And whether he wins a particular match on this level or not is still up to him and his skill.
I just thing that if somebody doesn't understand how the game creates the illusion of fairness he should educate himself instead of complaining. Its his problem, not games.