Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: Why Soviets are OP23 Sep 2020, 08:22 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Sep 2020, 08:00 AMGiaA What are these supposed weaknesses? Weak early game map control(penals or T2 openings), reliance on map control over combat potential with con openings, bad scaling of cons through mid game, leading to almost mandatory reliance of crutch T-70 especially in 1v1, over reliance on TD due to stock med armor just not being competitive against P4s outside of very lucky RNG streaks or overextentions, heavy infantry mp bleed in mid game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Brit Paratroopers23 Sep 2020, 08:13 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2020, 06:50 AMVipper 6 men squad with double Brens that have around Ober's LMG DPS. What possibly can go wrong? Do we see any rampaging blobs of USF LMG paras outside of 4 digit rank 4v4 tier? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why Soviets are OP23 Sep 2020, 07:48 AM Tl;dr: Soviets are still soviets and people will never stop overlooking weaknesses and underlining strong sides. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Limit to 1 ALL heavys5 Sep 2020, 23:00 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Sep 2020, 18:14 PMLeo251 Hi guys. I encounter big problems dealing with multiple KV1 and/or vanilla Churchills. Axis, specially Ost, have no proper counters to them. Ost has no TD to pen them, and Pak die too fast. Only Panther is "good" against them, but they miss too much on the move, and the ROF is too high. Even panther is horrible at killing them. I was wondering what do you think of limiting them by max 1 per time, just all of the other heavys in the game. So you want to fix L2P problem by changing the game and its going to help you not suck how? Your problem is you don't build anti tank guns nor place mines. Start from there. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: WC 51 Changes24 Aug 2020, 11:41 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2020, 11:30 AMGiaA You're usually fighting an honorable fight against hordes of forum warriors but in this case you're dead wrong and they happen to be right. WC51 is 100% broken. I doubt you'd find someone who plays the game and disagrees. And the reasons mentioned for why its that are completely off. Range and the fact cav rifles can ride it to make it USF M3 version, but superior against all but garrisons. Health and armor are already normalized to kubel, if we'll get another balance patch, there is a high chance M3 will also be normalised this way. Arty is completely pointless, because no one ever uses it nor gets it late game for it, mark target I don't know if I've ever seen it used, durability, again, is normalized for kubel already. Cost? It comes out as worse unit then UC as it isn't even armed and people scream 5-10 fuel map hack is too expensive, how a unit that can exclusively cap wouldn't be? Certain people with agenda make it sound like its 0cp luchs, when its unarmed M3. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: WC 51 Changes24 Aug 2020, 11:18 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2020, 11:15 AMGiaA I'm gonna answer that for him. Yes. But pls ignore me like you always do with people who aren't forum warriors Its fine, you can be acknowledged as long as you'll be seen before the spammers bury it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Potential economic system24 Aug 2020, 11:00 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2020, 10:57 AMEsxile Not after 5 minutes. Imo, reducing the fuel income from territory point by 1 should already reduce the game path. And probably already creates new balance issues between factions. Every faction which does not relay completely on support weapons and mainline inf would probably be crippled instantly. Delay T70 for too long against OKW if you don't spam guards and you're up for a loss. Tho only economy changes that game needs but won't get is reduced mun and fu income for team games. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: WC 51 Changes24 Aug 2020, 10:43 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2020, 10:39 AMmr.matrix300 "I dont understand this discussion, it is one of the most overperforming single units in 1v1. Lower its range, take away its late game abilities and it would still be viable" - A player who is rank 3 with USF in 1 vs 1 ( and top 5 with every other faction ) But ofc someone who doesn't play axis and someone who doesn't even play the game at all feel the need to defend the WC 51 ... Given the reasons people claim for why its OP, I don't think anyone here understands the discussion by your own criteria, including you. You bunch of muppets are completely oblivious to the fact that it doesn't matter what WC51 does, but what you put inside of it. Have you seen this unit "overperforming" even ONCE in your life without thompson cav rifles inside it? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: WC 51 Changes24 Aug 2020, 09:42 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2020, 09:39 AMJohnSmith I'm playing Ost and I still haven't faced a single good wc51 enemy. Everyone says the unit is OP but nobody knows how to use it and everyone wants to nerf it. LOL That's because pretty much all of last 2 years of "red unit OP" is not based on units performance, but one game or clip where usually a top player was lucky with/unlucky against. That's why people constantly claim everything OP without being able to produce even low level replay with evidence. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: give the okw a sniper21 Aug 2020, 21:45 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Aug 2020, 21:36 PMAngrade (Ægion) Personally, I say remove and replace all one man snipers. 8 years too late for that tbh. In: COH2 Balance