Profile of Katitof

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/katitof


Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback5 Feb 2021, 23:35 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Feb 2021, 23:32 PMVipper An mg that can fight other hmg but out ranging them is a bad idea... Why? If you're fighting HMGs using HMGs you are already doing it wrong. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Abandon5 Feb 2021, 23:31 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Feb 2021, 23:27 PMPip Its such a "Series defining trait" that it wasn't even present in CoH1, to my knowledge. "If cars are such transport defining commodity, why weren't they used in 1600?" kind of logic here at work. In: Lobby
Thread: Abandon5 Feb 2021, 19:59 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Feb 2021, 14:46 PMHannibal Well, so tiny that all pro players unanimously agreed that it needs to be removed in tournaments. I do understand the need to minimize that kind of RNG when its actual money at stake. But then again, they already play on a mod which removes it. No one is getting paid anything on ranked nor ranked is limited in any way to anyone however. I have played DoW3 and its scary how CoH2 becomes more and more like DoW3 gameplay wise with removal of all the series defining traits. I've played DoW2 when synch kills were removed from all units but heroes. Did it help competitive play? Sure it did. But it also killed defining feature of DoW series, DoW3 never had any synch kills and there was massive community outrage about it too. I would hate to see CoH go the same way, because if people keep complaining as they do and these features will get nerfed to the ground and then removed, we might see DoW3 CoH edition in the future. In: Lobby
Thread: Abandon4 Feb 2021, 23:50 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Feb 2021, 23:44 PMSander93 Well... none... because they've been using tourney mod for about a year now that removes it. Because naturally all the high tier competitive players voted to get rid of it. I might have forgotten about it. Still, I don't remember it being any frequent occurrence years prior. In: Lobby
Thread: Abandon4 Feb 2021, 23:42 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Feb 2021, 23:33 PMJPA32 The main disconnect I see with defenders of current abandon is the lack of understanding in how impactful an abandoned vehicle actually is to a game and just how easy it is to recover when it happens. It's rare, but it absolutely removes any notion of skillful play once it does happen and flips the table sideways in a way that isn't fun for anyone looking for a good game. Oh believe me, I have lost and won games by abandon myself. 4 total maybe? But vast majority of them were pre abandon "nerf", as of now, unless you dived a single suicidal vehicle and basically given it to enemy/he gave it to you, its not even possible to recover it against equally skilled opponent who wasn't completely forced off the field. The mechanic basically decides the games in so tiny, minor, insufficient % of games that I see this whole thread as little more then another "I lost one game, I think I lost it because X, therefore I will rant about X to have it removed" kind of thread. Take literally any tournament we've had recently and count how many games were won or lost because of it. You'll find out that this is not an actual issue, but a result of people running out of things to bitch about. In: Lobby
Thread: Abandon4 Feb 2021, 21:57 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Feb 2021, 21:34 PMPip Should we revert to the release version of CoH2, given that changes are inherently bad? "I got my nail chipped! Doctor, just rip my arm off, it'll be better this way!" kind of logic here. They are incredibly frustrating, and I really can't see why RNG dictating something rather than you being able to it yourself is "fun". I like to play games, not have them played for me. They also are incredibly rare and add to the spirit of the series - unpredictability. There are whole genres built with nothing but RNG with well known and acclaimed titles. And one more time, if you can't take potential loss, don't commit to a move. Its perfectly valid to play safe and not overextend. Abandoned vehicles already have main gun and engine destroyed, if you can't deal with that, you've lost anyway. In: Lobby
Thread: Zis-3 as an AT gun4 Feb 2021, 19:47 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Feb 2021, 18:20 PMDescolata ZIS spam is curently the 1v1 meta, i think its in an acceptable place. Lower scatter on the barrage post AoE nerf would be nice to ensure the targeted MG actually moves. 2 is not a spam, its standard for all factions. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why not Jagdpanther?4 Feb 2021, 16:19 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Feb 2021, 15:32 PMPip If they're remaking models then any IP concerns would be irrelevant anyway, I'm not sure why anyone's even bothering talking about IP if the discussion is revolving around creation of new models of WWII era vehicles, rather than directly using existing assets. That said... you were talking about reusing models in post #108. 105th and earlier ones provided enough context to not be confused about it. From the very beginning I was talking about ideas of units and replacing old with new ones for variety, while Widerstreit seemed to choke on ww2 viagra and get rage boner about actual coh1 assets. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback4 Feb 2021, 10:36 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Feb 2021, 10:35 AMSupport Sapper Yeah, i just think they can use any improvement they can get, tho. Not having in-combat movement penalty seems like quite a big improvement to me. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [Winter Balance Update] UKF Feedback4 Feb 2021, 10:13 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Feb 2021, 10:04 AMSupport Sapper Im not saying them is bad, i use them quite alot and just think they can be improved. I know what you mean, I'm just saying you don't get them for their firepower or combat capabilities. In: COH2 Balance