Some of the clips are definitely weird timing wise and the Brummbar is especially weird but I don't think you can ban him 100% without definitive proof of him cheating. I think a lot of people don't really how important timing is in CoH 2 especially in high level games. Attack move also reacts instantly when something is spotted at the edge of fog war. Lucky timing of mg's setting up happens all of the time in games. Sometimes you just predict where the opponent is coming from and guess right. If Seeking was cheating I feel like he would be more dominant because he is already a Top 10 player in 1v1 mechanically speaking. I would just look at it as innocent until proven guilty and even though there is some solid evidence but its not overwhelming in my opinion. Banning Kimbo in this situation is even more strange because its under the assumption that Kimbo was actively playing with a map hacker that he knew was cheating and he did it anyway. I think its just too many assumptions to be absolutely certain.
Come on, pinpoint accurate "random" shot right into the position of CLOAKED and UNDETECTED ATG?
That alone is well beyond "lucky" or "anticipation".
I don't think the VSL upgrade gives anything except a fifth man with an STG (and free healing) now, does it? The RA bonus was removed, and I thought the cooldown reduction was removed a while ago?
Not to say a fifth man with an STG is a bad thing, of course, the extra durability is really nice despite the damage improvement being fairly unimpressive.
Puma confirmed ultimate flanking unit in game by having 100% pen increase at close range.
We can further nerf range to standard 40, because it doesn't need any more as a flanking vehicle.
We've already established correct number, I was going by the hp amount it had prior to this change, but if its going to get 1000, then let it be 1000, I'm not going to cry about it.
No need to vipper around, Hannibal.
Did they also give it an ability called "flanking speed" by accident?
Did they also a profile with higher close penetration similar to T-34/76 and Puma by accident? It far penetration is actually 140 which lower even form the SU-76 with 165 at the same range so not that great for a TD.
Did they describe as:
"The M10 ‘Wolverine’ Tank Destroyer’s 3” gun has decent armor penetration and its mobility allows it to flank the most heavily armored enemy vehicles." by accident?
Relic clearly give the flanker role to the M10.
(The AP round requires vet 1.)
By that logic, P4 and Panthers should be useless vs anything else then attack on France and Poland, because blitz didn't worked elsewhere.
Relic Entertainment
