Profile of RMMLz

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

General Information
Register Time: 27 Dec 2013, 16:54 PM
Last Visit Time: 28 Mar 2024, 23:06 PM
Website: https://shaderweb.com/en
Residence:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Nationality:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Timezone: Asia/Tehran
Game Name: <HOJAT>RMMLz

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Upcoming Mod - Balance feedback please26 Feb 2015, 18:24 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Feb 2015, 17:29 PMofield I disagree to some extend, while most units are indeed fine and other need only a slight adjustment, major problems like the Call In Meta, which kills the diversity of the game/viable strategies, are not fixed by simple nerfs and buffs. They will be fixed good sir. As Soviets, imagine if SU85 was viable, would you still wait for T34/85? Simple nerfs like increasing CP and/or cost, and on the other hand a simple price reduction for buildings, everything would change. I have to clarify though, "the call in meta" by itself ids not a bad thing! By changing the meta, some people aim to completely eradicate the call-in. Well that's not gonna happen. This is called having a lot of viable options. The thing is that call-ins are abused. They are far cheaper than teching. So, "simply" nerfing them a bit, and buffing core units would change things in a good way. But if you are trying to totally destroy call-ins and turn them to some useless units, that's bad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should Commander call-ins have a limit per game?26 Feb 2015, 12:56 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Feb 2015, 09:53 AMCptEend Even if it is by design, it's bad design, and something should be done about it. There's no point in having 20 commanders if only a couple of them are viable because they happen to have call-in units. It is by design, and it is bad design. I remember someone from relic mentioned something about Cons are not meant to be late game units or you have to rely on your commanders BLAH BLAH, but I'm no sure where or when I've heard/seen something like this. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: reasoning for putting a flak gun on the OKW base building?26 Feb 2015, 12:53 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Feb 2015, 12:20 PMHighfiveeeee IMO most people here complain because they didn't even try mortars, PaKs or Penals because everything soviet players atm do in terms of playstyle is 5-6 conscripts to IS2/T34. I haven't seen a single T1/T2 unit in my last 10 games against the Russians. If playing T1 you have penals and snipers which are very strong against OKW. In addition with a 120mm mortar which is also incredibly strong against OKW you can do a smoke barrage -> 2 demo charges with your penals and the OKW has lost the game. This. Both 80mm and 120mm mortars can destroy the base, and with some luck insta-wipe the Pios repairing it, while having no viable indirect fire to counter the mortar. The basis of OKW (and Ostheer nowadays) is to stall the game for Panthers/KTs. Some soviet players tend to forget the mid game, when OKW has the truck up, 4-5 schrecked volks a 1-2 Obers and they just invest resources for IS2. The OKW player can finish the game at this point. It's a bit harder as USF, but Captain tier with both ATG and pack howie can and will conter OKW base rush. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Upcoming Mod - Balance feedback please26 Feb 2015, 11:51 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Feb 2015, 20:18 PMshadowwada there is a diff from balancing the game and reworking the game. For the 1000th time, this. These changes look cool on paper, but they are not gonna happen. First of all there are a lot easier changes Relic can do, which has been discussed before. Reworking factions a unlikely and I'm sure that they will cause a lot more balance problems. Some small issues with these changes: - LMG change are not gonna help people deal with blobs, its gonna persuade them even more. - vCoH tank traps? no thank you. This way poor USF can do nothing, but the glorious panthers and tigers will troll around the map - changing core infantry like that, specially for Ostheer is a bad bad idea. Grens are helpless early, but turning them into volks is not gonna be of any help. - 10 Fuel and second para squad? Want some fries with that? - Soviets do need better line infantry late game, but they already have enough CQC capabilities, giving Cons PPSH is not gonna be a good Idea -etc. etc. Again, these changes might, or might not work. Test them as a mod, why the hell not. But even if they turn out fine, DO NOT expect Relic to implement them, or even consider them because of: - They are taking their time for the slightest changes, reworking the game like this is too much resource intensive and is very very unlikely - More importantly, the game does not need drastic changes. Maybe a few OKW adjustments, the rest can be easily fixed with simple nerfs and buffs. These kind of changes will make things worse. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: reasoning for putting a flak gun on the OKW base building?26 Feb 2015, 10:40 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Feb 2015, 09:39 AMKronosaur0s AT Gun, 120mm... etc THIS. As much as I agree that OKW definitely need adjustments and nerfs, Flak base rush can be countered and it's very rewarding. Although the range and the AA capabilities are kinda over performing, but the general idea is not as bad as some people say. It's penetration is also too much. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to take out Axis Blobs & Heavy Tanks26 Feb 2015, 07:53 AM welcome. It's a problems with 3s and 4s. Those games are total BS, I really suggest stop playing larger games if you want to stay sane. Axis can stall the game and bring in the big guns. On a tactical note, you have better early game advantages, specially soviets. If you are against OKW, spam T1 with maxim/rifle support from your teammates. B4 is also a beast if OSTHEER players don't choose a doctrine with Recon and Stuka. Soviet players should go for IS2 and USF players support them jacksons (not very viable though). 120mm mortars, exploiting buildings and planting demos is also good. But again, 3s and 4s are screwed up. OKW players can get a Stuka in less than 10 minutes (I think my own record was 6-7 minutes) which is MESSED UP. Edit: I thought this was an actual question, not an statement. In: Lobby
Thread: Should Commander call-ins have a limit per game?26 Feb 2015, 07:32 AM Nope, absolutely not if you ask me. The call in meta (call in spam actually) is a pain in the ass we all know that, and and every faction expect OKW can exploit that, because their core units are viable enough that they don't need to rely on call ins. This can not be said for other factions. USF should spam E8s to finish the game before the arrival of KT/JGDPZ. For soviets, spamming call ins is cheaper. Limiting the call-ins is like taking a pain killer, it reduces your pain but the underlying problem is still there, and is getting worse. Players should have a lot of options to play, and one of the should be relying on call-ins. If you give them good core units, they would change their play style. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Wehrmacht Medic Kit 24 Feb 2015, 07:30 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2015, 00:44 AMSarantini med kits should be: can be used on self heal the squad to full health Exactly. This is over priced now, and kinda useless comparing to other factions, specially USF and OKW. Self healing + some kinda debuff would be nice, like in vCoH. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Wehrmacht Medic Kit 23 Feb 2015, 18:49 PM Are you saying that Medic kit is OP? In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: No kick player feature?23 Feb 2015, 08:47 AM As you said, 4v4 is for laughs but it's still a pain in the ass to see people like this ruin your game. The addition of player kick is unlikely. I think if they reduce the surrender vote requirement to 3 negative vote, you can at least stop wasting more time. In: Lobby