Profile of RMMLz

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

General Information
Register Time: 27 Dec 2013, 16:54 PM
Last Visit Time: 28 Mar 2024, 23:06 PM
Website: https://shaderweb.com/en
Residence:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Nationality:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Timezone: Asia/Tehran
Game Name: <HOJAT>RMMLz

Show Latest Posts


Thread: PGrens with double panzerschrecks against USF18 Feb 2015, 13:13 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2015, 04:48 AMboc120 I'm with VonIvan. Thread over. Yup. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relic PLS stop the BLOBS18 Feb 2015, 12:19 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2015, 01:57 AMDeath's Head That's not a blob 'mate, THIS is a blob: LULWUT!!! Supreme commander I presume. Man that game need popcap. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer - MG42 17 Feb 2015, 17:47 PM Even a teeny tiny change done by cruzz in Kappatch would be a huge step forward. Remove received accuracy defuff and change the squad formation so the gunner doesn't get sniped. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Do you think CoH multiplayer will go f2p?17 Feb 2015, 15:38 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Feb 2015, 13:15 PMThe amazing Chandler +1 and to OP: HELL NO. There is no such thing as F2P. The companys (99% of them) are BS us. I never saw i F2P game where idont have to buy anything, as i said, F2P is BIG AZZ BS. Well there are some exceptions. I used to play LoL a lot and I can confirm that LoL is 100% F2P, and you can become the best player without spending a buck. The main issue is developer's greed. Riot games did it right. They have made a fantastic game (I'm not talking about the game being fun or anything, just the mechanics, support, new content etc.) and that's mostly because of the genre they've chosen, so they don't have to rob the customer. They can release new content as long as they are creative. The genre itself has also a huge audience. I've not played DoTA2 but I think that Valve is alo doing it right. Some "casual games" like WoT or War thunder are alo reasonable F2P games. This can not be said about a game like CoH2. The genre is different, not many people are invested enough in RTS games, and the game itself is not the competitive type (RNG, Awful performance, state of balance etc.) Releasing new content is not very easy for this game either. They might start releasing skins and decals, but at the end they'll end up selling P2W content because even as a F2P game, they are not gonna make a lot of money to keep the things going. All that being said, I'm OK with the whole F2P thing if done right, but I don't know if they can pull it off. Larger player base is always welcome. In: Lobby
Thread: P4717 Feb 2015, 15:25 PM It's perfect against super heavies, and other tanks if you disable them. In small maps (Langreskaya for example) it's kinda too powerful because it covers most of the map. It's a waste of muni when you have Blitzkrieg tactics. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: resource income that shouldn't have existed17 Feb 2015, 15:21 PM Need replay. It's nearly impossible because the moment something like this happens, they'll get Sync Error. So cheats or bugs of this kind will not happen. Probably the territories were connected. Again, need replay. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Do you think CoH multiplayer will go f2p?17 Feb 2015, 09:21 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Feb 2015, 08:26 AMNuclear Arbitor i don't think sega or relic have either the guts to do it or the skill to do it successfully. Exactly. I more concerned about their Business model (in other words, skill) if they are going to do this. In: Lobby
Thread: PGrens with double panzerschrecks against USF17 Feb 2015, 06:21 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Feb 2015, 23:01 PMAlexzandvar I don't expect Pgrens to beat a sherman 1 on 1, or any generalist medium tank 1 on 1. But I would expect some sort of return for my investment instead of them getting 1 shot by a giant Rifleblob of death despite covering them with multiple other units. This. We don' expect them to become Ubervolks armed with laser guided missiles. They are just not worth it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PGrens with double panzerschrecks against USF16 Feb 2015, 22:02 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Feb 2015, 19:57 PMJHeartless Sherman does to Pgrens what Tigers/P4s/Stugs to a lesser degree/Brummbars/Luchs/Ostwinds do to Bazooka squads. I see no real issue with this. The Sherman being what the Sherman is defines the USFs core advantage. Flexibility. The Sherman is best at AI. I would classify it personally as an AI tank. Thus not cost effective to counter with Infantry. And the sole reason its justified Pound for Pound Axis tanks have better armor and AT ability. If the Infantry vs AI tank Meta needs to be adjusted then Zooks should be looked at I would think. Tigers deal with infantry pretty well, but that's a late game tank and very expensive (are we already comparing Tigers and Shermans? ), and allied infantry are less susceptible to insta-wipes because of larger numbers. I have to disagree with you about PzIVs and StuGs do the same thing with Bazooka squads. Although they do sometimes perform crazy wipes, that's because of the cover system, we can check stats and compare them. As you said, USF should be flexible by design, but Shermans counter medium armor and infantry with ease and they arrive quickly, so the USF player gains huge map control (Remeber that we are talking about USF vs Ostheer). I've always been a fan of "reduce damage increase AOE" regarding all of Explosive Shells (Shermans, Brummbar, TrolStuka, ISU etc.) Your point about Bazooka is valid. That thing is pure BS, not only you have to spend muni, you lose significant amount of firepower. Need slight pen increase and damage, so you can actually rely on your Bazooka squad to hold Medium armor at bay. I don't know how can they fix this situation, because USF relies on Shermans and they decent HE damage versus OKW. Against Ostheer though, I'm not sure what to do. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PGrens with double panzerschrecks against USF16 Feb 2015, 19:40 PM Jump back to quoted post16 Feb 2015, 19:06 PMJHeartless Please check the Pen of HE rounds. Then check the Pen of AT rounds. The best a Sherman gets is 120 Pen.In that mode they wont one shot whipe Pgrens. In HE mode it can as it has 0 Pen without this cooldown. Jackson is an AT tank. Sherman is an AI tank that can help with AT sometimes through flanking or good RNG. Its primary claim to fame is AI. Its an AI tank. Because thats what its best at by design. That is the best tank the USF has for cost imho because it is flexible. It can do both. One better then the other... That's exactly what I'm talking about! It's a multi-role unit, mostly AI which can carry his weight vs medium armor and help other units when fighting heavier units, it performs well against Puma,Ostwin,Stug and even PzIV. But it's HE round have a great potential to insta-wipe entire squads, that's messed up. With the new cover system, those poor Pzgren bastards die the moment they take cover. So I'm not arguing about Sherman being OP or anything. I'm not saying it's sherman's fault, but right now Shermans are hard counters of their soft counter (Pzgrens). Pzgrens are also very expensive (teching, MP, and 120 freaking muni) so they have to be more viable against Medium armor. In: COH2 Balance