Profile of RMMLz

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1

General Information
Register Time: 27 Dec 2013, 16:54 PM
Last Visit Time: 28 Mar 2024, 23:06 PM
Website: https://shaderweb.com/en
Residence:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Nationality:

Iran, Islamic Republic Of
Timezone: Asia/Tehran
Game Name: <HOJAT>RMMLz

Show Latest Posts


Thread: T34/76 should get a slight buff3 Apr 2015, 23:58 PM I think they need some kind of buff, but really don't know in what direction. Maybe scale better for late game. Something like Vet 3 Increased penetration. If you rush for a t34 and you get your enemy by surprise, they perform very well. But as the game goes on, they become obsolete. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: PTRS now OP?3 Apr 2015, 23:46 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2015, 21:28 PMASneakyFox that MG should have lost that engagement regardless. a single 240 MP machine gun does not and should not beat 5 full squads of conscripts. (or 5 full squads of grenadiers or volksgren or...) if you had any kind of synergy or combined arms going on you would have run all 5 squads of conscripts off the map, but you just had a single MG. Again with the X>Y MP. The thing is, the Soviet player just Mindlessly rushed to HMG, and all squads were in the suppression zone, AND they were suppressed, yet they destroyed the HMG. PTRS was a piece of crap, and made all doctrines with Guards worthless. Now, Guard are the units they should be (Both AI and AT) but Cons with PTRS are broken. Its like saying a Schreck blob should counter everything on it's patch (5x235mp+5x90muni BLAH BLAH). Well, they shouldn't (which they still kinda do) and PTRS "on Cons" shouldn't perform like this. Simply creating a weapon profile for PTRS will fix this. Guard will remain AT/AT jack of all trades (which adds a lot of variety to the game) and Cons can not exploit this. IMO, it's OK for Guard to counter and destroy and MG with smart play (Cons draw fire, Guards kill the MG). But Consblob lazy play (Like in the video) is not something we want. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 6 consecutive losses against arranged teams3 Apr 2015, 23:41 PM It's not LoL with 30 MILLION players. You can expect separate ques for AT/Randumb. If you are really inclined to play 4v4, just find 3 competent players. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Relic's Roadmap3 Apr 2015, 14:42 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2015, 14:20 PMBrachiaraidos Massive misrepresentation of history. Without allied support Germany would have lost the war within five years. They may have been the best trained and equipped force on the Axis side, but they can't use that to swing the frankly staggering disparity of manpower, raw resources and field presence entirely in their favour for half a decade. They may not have preformed in as noteworthy a fashion as Germany, but their presence was an utter necessity for the Axis war effort. Think of it like a game of Chess. Your queen is a powerful piece, but if you start the game without any pawns, knights, bishops or rooks, you're doomed anyway. We are talking from a design stand point. All the German warmachine and Wunderwaffe myths, along with the HUGE amount of weapons and armor make them ideal for designing game elements. There are still units like Jagdpanther, Hetzer, Marder, PzIII, etc. are still appealing units. This can not be said about other Axis forces. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic's Roadmap3 Apr 2015, 10:58 AM The new faction is UK, here are some Hollywood style proof: -Some clue in game files. -There were pictures of Churchill and British commandos on the background. -The icon in road map is a British soldier. Anyway, I'm worried. Both balance and technical problems are a mess. I hope they fix the game (bugs at least) and then go ahead and add another faction. In: Lobby
Thread: PTRS now OP?3 Apr 2015, 10:47 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2015, 07:06 AMAustralian Magic And high cost should prevent such huge blobs. But if not, then only nerf. Yet it must come with separeted files for guards and cons ptrs since guards are useful, not op. You don't balance these kind of things with price only you know. Obers were 400MP and OP, KT is around 400 fuel, and was OP etc. etc. So over priced but over performing units ruin the game. The thing that they can destroy team weapons is the major problem. Remember how people used to cry about Obers sniping MGs? Well this is now happening except they don't decrew the weapon, they fucking destroy it. 2PTRS guns even for 120muni will still dominate the game. PTRS needs increased penetration and RoF, or HUGE accuracy nerf versus team weapons. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Announcement later today?2 Apr 2015, 19:54 PM My main hope for the stream are these: 1. Less trolling by the viewers, and also less illogical bans. 2. Quinn either plays they game, or announces something, not both ( ) 3. Hopefully, they admit that their QA team is not doing its job very well. I wish we had a thread so we all could ask our questions, and then someone as the representative of COH2.ORG would ask the questions one by one. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Announcement later today?2 Apr 2015, 14:19 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2015, 14:05 PMJohnnyB Apparently people are not yet sick about getting new desapointment because of bugs, performance and balance problems. All they need are 6 - 8 - God knows how many factions. It's already ridiculous that USF can play together with Soviets in team games - that actualy never happened. Now we will have brits aside Soviets? Oh Lordy. There is a map which "literally can not be played as USF", and people want more content. But frankly I'm more concerned about a new Axis faction. I can already imagine the forums wars about AXIS OP ALLIED OP NURF BUFF NURF BUFF before even they announce the release date. People have mistaken this game with MOBAs. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Announcement later today?2 Apr 2015, 13:57 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2015, 13:29 PMJackiebrown If Brits are the announcement, Praise The Lord! Seriously? In this shitstorm of balance and technical problems, yet another faction? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: PTRS now OP?2 Apr 2015, 13:46 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Apr 2015, 13:37 PMPurlictor How does the PTRS upgrade for cons compare to the gren LMG42? (I'm not asking for your anecdotal evidence, I'm just wondering if anyone ever looked at the stats of both.) It seems that the PTRS now easily destroys weapons before killing the crew, a couple of shots and BAM your MG or PAK is gone. In: COH2 Balance