Thread: Luchs12 Dec 2015, 08:31 AM
but the brits cant handle the fast luch at all,ofc we can not nerf the HP but delay it a little more,just like the t-70 rush.
If one faction can't handle something that everyone else can, maybe that's a sign that there's a problem with that faction rather than the unit? |
I voted too soon, according to Stormless, this isn't even OKW's final form.
The rest rolls out after Christmas. |
That's not a nerf to Shreks at all. Shreks are fine, it's the ubiquitous Volks shrek blob that is an issue and all of us who aren't slobbering fanboyz are trying to find solutions to the brain-dead play-style.
You want them to be a tech unlock that must be picked up at HQ and cannot be dual purchased or paired with any other weapon. Nobody's going to use 1 Panzerschreck Obers (No MG 34) or 1 Panzerschreck Sturmpioneers (No Sweeper), that's dumb and just makes the unit expensive but ineffective. So that leaves Volksgrenadiers as the only viable unit to buy them on. But they were the only unit you could get them on anyway, so this is just a roundabout nerf to Panzerschrecks. |
Thread: Luchs12 Dec 2015, 04:01 AM
I can't remember EVER saying or hearing someone in a match along the lines of "lookout he has a 57mm!"
But he's right, the 57mm AT Gun fires faster than the Pak 40 with the same damage, and the lower penetration doesn't matter because it's still higher than the Luch's armour. Remember how nobody likes to use the T-70 because the old Pak 40 would kill it way too quickly? That's what the 57mm would do to a 320HP Luchs. |
Instead of worrying about on which infantry the Shrek upgrade belongs, why not lock Shreks behind side tech (this should happen regardless) and give them the annoying weapon racks that USF and UKF have?
Then the OKW player can put Shreks on whatever he wants. Although it should be limited to one Shrek a squad.
So basically really over-complex and roundabout way of saying "nerf the Panzerschreck"? |
E8 and t3485 are in docs, so don't compare stack units with doc units that must be better. On topic, p4 is fine
Literally just went over this.
Being a "doctrinal unit" doesn't mean shit. I don't see the Ostheer Puma outperforming the OKW Puma, or the M4C outperforming the Panzer IV, or the MG 34 outperforming... anything.
Doctrine units open up new options, it doesn't mean it's automatically supposed to be better than stock units. It isn't. |
*Squints hard* Cruzz, is that you?
Cruzz is retired. |
I don't think removing rocket artillery is something anybody asked for. Rather the complaints are that the British and Americans lack rocket artillery. |
2. This has been around for some time. It's caused by a User unsubscribing to a Mod, but not delete it. If it gets updated by the Author this bug occurs.
Unsubscribing to a mod should delete it, especially since you can't tell what mod is what because the name is just a nine letter ID, for example: 468071960.sga |
Thread: Luchs11 Dec 2015, 18:13 PM
The Luchs is probably fine, as someone said you don't get healing if you rush Luchs. The Luchs is also countered by the T-70 and Stuart, which it cannot beat due to low penetration. |