Profile of NorthWeapon

Welcome to USF!

Yes airborne commander is great for what you said.

What playlist? 1v1? 4v4?

As DevM says in his USF guide for 1v1, you only go Captain if things are not going great. Your AT should be covered by Stuart and Sherman and Rear Echelon w/ 2 Bazookas. You can back tech to Captain if they have fuel for too long and you don't have any AT vehicles.

Vs. OKW MG is more important.

Sandbag and mines come with the Infantry Company too, this commander is much more meta than Heavy Cav for 2v2+

If you go Lieutenant, your AT is the Stuart. Spamming Jacksons is a safe bet for 3v3+. For 1v1 you want an early M4 Sherman.

The idea is as USF you want to snowball, so the whole idea is you get your tanks out before the Axis do. So ideally you don't need an AT gun. But if things are getting hairy, then you can backtech to Captain for ATG.

TwistedTootsy is good to watch. As you can see, he didn't make an ATG, although he stole a Raketenwerfer.

. He likes to do 2 Rear Echelons with double Zooks. And he likes Cavalry Riflemen + Sherman Spam. This is for 1v1 obviously.

LT is very good and safe option. Making 1 or 2 M20s is great followed by a Stuart. I managed to get a +13 winstreak in 1v1 as USF by going Mechanized company for early Cavalry Riflemen and double m20 followed by a Stuart. Here's the important part: I win within 11 minutes usually, usually around ~7mins after I have 2 M20s and a Stuart in the field. This is ideal for USF.

Here's a video of what I am talking about: . I won at the 14 min mark but game was already decided at 10:07 and was gg.

It is hard to comeback as USF so its good to go all-in early game, mid-game.

Wait wait WAIT

this is not 3 Falls vs. 1IS

This is 3 Falls vs. Cromwell + IS

Vent you can, but this does not show any kind of imbalance

Stats lie. Different match ups, different maps, different commanders, different build orders, different opponents, different RNG.

Always be skeptical with statistics, most are misleading or misinterpreted.

Ostheer has been consistently buffed since 2016/2017 ever since balance preview mod. It's a little crazy saying they suck.

Watch ML4 tourney, Ostheer didn't seem underwhelming.

I've seen this happen in lobby to others

Why change just for the sake of changing?? Airborne is fine how it is.

Its a common game design hiccup; game developers play their game so much till they want to change it cuz they get bored.

Just because you are bored of the same old thing doesn't mean new players have the same experience.

So don't change airborne just for the sake of changing it. It's fine. Maybe look at Armor company, that's a rarely used commander. Or Heavy Cavalry