Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: Pgrens in 250 HT takes damage10 Sep 2019, 17:42 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2019, 16:20 PMJibberJabberJobber This is not a really bug, rather it's an inconsistency with snares. Axis Faust = minimal AoE + 'damage all in hold' false = no damage to units inside halftracks. OKW AT riflenade = low AoE + 'damage all in hold' false = minimal damage to units inside halftracks. USF AT riflenade = high AoE + 'damage all in hold' false = minor damage to units inside halftracks. AT nades = medium AoE + 'damage all in hold' true = high damage to units inside halftracks. Now where the snare hits is important and is propably why you thought Pio's don't receive damage inside the 250 while they actually do, it makes positioning of the 250 important: AT nade hits the front of the 250 = no damage to models inside the vehicle. AT nade hits either side = high damage to all four models. AT nade hits the rear = high damage to the two models in the back of the 250. To the patch team: because AT nades are the real outlier here, I'd propose setting 'damage all in hold' to false as the most easy solution to this problem. I imagine this been like there is no kind of guideline so we end up with so many inconsistencies across the board. Probably no one up to this date bothered to check it. Should PM modteam if it's possible to fix now or later as it SHOULD only be a true to false change. PD: never undersestimate how unrelated things can bug out. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Soviet September patch discussion10 Sep 2019, 01:35 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2019, 23:22 PMthedarkarmadillo Not sure what you mean. Some recon abilities do reveal units but others don't it's strange. I wouldn't mind a normalization in that regard. Camo wouldn't be such a big deal if there were more and reliable ways to dispel it. Soviet casts mortar flare. The move has no effect. OKW cast artillery flare. It's supper effective! Soviet plants a trip wire flare. It's not very effective. OKW chooses Overwatch doctrine. Early warning has no effect. Long etc. including infantry flares and probably other abilities as well. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Message to the Community 9 Sep 2019, 20:09 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2019, 18:28 PMStug life lol i fully believe that any forum warrior here can't even reach top 100 1vs1 (me too) leave alone top 10 Then don't worry, here is a secret top pro and veteran players don't want you to know. Step 1: buy at least 10 copies of the game (Relic happy noises). "But there's an easier way with Stea...." Step 2: proceed to play your 10 qualifying games. Step 3: play only on awkward hours, when no good player is online. Step 4: it doesn't matter who you win against. Aim for the 10/0 but 7/10 would be fine. Step 5: Waste time in the forums while waiting in queue. Shitpost (on the SB only pls). Step 6: ???? Step 7: profit. In: Lobby
Thread: UKF September patch discussion9 Sep 2019, 19:54 PM Not sure if possible but this could apply to all units. Made the AA mode increase rotation speed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: A comparison of mortar in the game9 Sep 2019, 19:50 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2019, 17:38 PMVipper I actually find the 120mm useful in attacking OKW trucks. It also vets when doing so. I'm not sure something changed, but i don't find the extra 20 range worth it, when a normal mortar would be doing more DPS into a static position. Talking about vet, IIRC it takes the same vet to get to vet 1 and half than for a normal mortar to get to vet3. It has the same requirements as when it was more expensive and doing more damage. Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2019, 19:11 PMHannibal If we really want to compare mortars/howitzer etc, we would need the following infos: - scatter values (check) - AoE profile (check) - range, barrage and auto fire - rate of fire - cost I think we're missing some info to fully compare them. If somebody could give me the "raw data" for AoE (by that I mean the damage modifiers instead of the exact damage at the reference point), I can make a plot out of it to visualize. You can easily extrapolate it by doing the reverse process. "All" mortar shells do 80dmg. Near range is 0.85 (as in patchnotes) for it to be 68dmg. 40 > 0.5 32 > 0.4 20 > 0.25 16 > 0.2 160 > 1.0 24 > 0.15 8 > 0.05 In: Lobby
Thread: indirect fire support9 Sep 2019, 19:35 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2019, 17:28 PMStug life isn't far damage like 20 ? 2 x20 =40 u at least need 2 volley to hit for both mortar Once i can i'll test but it's even less dmg than that. 0.5 dmg reduction. So, atm, it's just 10 per hit on the building. Moving it to 15 and making it double, you would still need 3 volleys to hit. But remind yourself, that you don't know if a mortar is hitting you or not and since barrage fire faster, you are probably gonna react after the 2nd volley is already hitting or in the air. Thats only if you are not actually aiming correctly at all as well. In: Lobby
Thread: indirect fire support9 Sep 2019, 17:19 PM Heavy no with tanks, on mortars it could be ok. Cautious about garrison. Will have to test it, but double mortars on barrage could kill a squad before you realise what is happening (far dmg applying to all models) In: Lobby
Thread: A comparison of mortar in the game9 Sep 2019, 17:06 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2019, 15:43 PMGrumpy You didn't post the scatter values or ROF. I've tried a 120 a couple of times in the current patch and it rarely hits anything, and doesn't seem to really do much. The AOE is larger but it seems so inaccurate that it doesn't matter. The pop cap and cost are also completely out of line with its performance. Because i already wasted time putting the AoE values before i left. I'm sure anyone else can put the scatter values for the rest of the units. This is what i have from another post -AA RoF: Howie: 9.94s 120mm: 14.15 OH 81mm: 10.81s ISG: 8.935 -Scatter (Angle/Distance Ratio/Distance offset) Howie: 6/0.1/8 120mm: 10/0.1/10 81mm: 10/0.08/8 ISG: 6/0.1/5 120mm is not worth it, if you have T2 set up. You hit once in a blue moon, more so with it's slow RoF. If you need a mortar and don't have T2, you might save the 160 worth of building the tier. In: Lobby
Thread: A comparison of mortar in the game9 Sep 2019, 13:58 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2019, 13:43 PMullumulu it cost a lot? you get 2 mortars for only 350mp. Yes they are static...but if u not dumb you can choose ideal positions for them and the wipe a lot here and there...give smoke support and have huge range The autofire, for all purposes, have the same range as all other normal mortars. It's 85, but that's just there so you can't just "fire" at the boarder and still hit it without retaliation. Barrage is indeed 115 for HE and 150 for smoke, but that's for something which can't reposition itself. In: Lobby
Thread: A comparison of mortar in the game9 Sep 2019, 13:55 PM AoE: UKF mortar emplacement, OH mortar, SU 82mm, Mortar HTs. Radius/Area: 4 / 50.26 Distance/Damage/Area: Near: 1 / 68 / 3.14 Mid: 2 / 40 / 12.57 Far: 3 / 20 / 31.01 USF mortar R: 4 / 50.26 Near: 0.75 / 68 / 1.77 Mid: 1.5 / 40 / 7.07 Far: 3 / 20 / 31.01 ISG: R: 4 / 50.26 Near: 0.75 / 68 / 1.77 Mid: 1.5 / 32 / 7.07 Far: 2.25 / 16 / 15.90 120mm barrage: R: 6 / 113.10 N: 1.1 / 68 / 3.80 M: 3.5 / 40 / 38.48 F: 4.5 / 20 / 63.62 120mm AA: Near: 1.5 / 68 / 7.07 Mid: 3 / 40 / 31.01 Far: 4.5 / 20 / 63.62 Pack Howie: R: 5 / 78.54 N: 1.5 / 68 / 7.07 M: 3 / 40 / 31.01 F: 4.5 / 20 / 63.62 Heat: same but with this dmg profiles 160/24/8. In: Lobby