snip
If you were to take some time to read, you would see that i've already answered your questions.
At what point does speed difference become meaningful?
"You start to notice a difference with the Cromwell. So i'll say that's the bare minimum for long ranges and values above that for short ranges."
Any difference in speed below 0.7 is only noticeable at long range. +1.0 for short ranges.
As a rule are allied tanks faster than axis tanks?
If you need a general rule with exceptions, sure. Problem comes there are too many exceptions. It's stupid to talk about Axis vs Allies when it's either OH, OKW vs USF, SU, UKF respectively. Each faction has specific vehicles with different values on different roles and "weight" (role, cost, vet, hp pool, armor)
Ostwind 6.3 > Centaur 5.2
Cromwell (7) > T3476, M4C, PIV Command tank (6.5) > M4A3, 76mm (6.4) > PIV, T3485, (6.3) > E8 (6.1) OKW PIV (6.0)
M10 (7) > Jackson (6.5) > Stug (6) > Su85 (5.7) > JPIV (5.5) > FF (5.3)
Scott (7) > Stug E (6) > Brummbar (5.7) > Bulldozer (5.3) > KV2 (4.9) > ISU (4.5)
Comet (6.9) > Panther (6.6) > T85 > E8 > Pershing (6) > KV1 (5.1)
Pershing (6) > Tiger (5.2) > IS2 (5) > KV2 (4.9) TA (4.7) > Churchill (4) > KT-Croc (3.8)
ISU (4.5) > Ele (3.3) > JT (3)
I'm asking you these questions because you've first insulted my reasoning with :
If you thought i insulted you, that's my bad. I answered in the same manner you were expressing this post:
An alt account...?
I mentioned the panther in my post.
The other quote is referencing target size. Oh no an extra .06 percent chance for a direct hit. Exclusively to the Sherman as far as mediums go. The pershing has the smallest of the heavy target sizes. Imba! IIIIIIImmmmmmbbbbbbaaaaa!
and second I'm not sure you know what equivalent means
Here's the definition for equivalent provided by webster
English is not my first language. From same page:
"
corresponding or virtually identical especially in effect or function". I used equivalent as similar.