Profile of Jaigen

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1130

General Information


Thread: Ostheer - MG42 16 Mar 2015, 02:01 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Mar 2015, 01:31 AMVuther Yeah, I'd really say it's better to fix the early-game manpower/unit count between USF and Wehrmacht before we mess with the rest of it very much. The units Wehrmacht has for it aren't SU-76 awful (aside from the Sniper dying when something breathes on him). I wish this was true. half of the ostheer stock is under performing for cost mg42 included. BTW early game is usf vs ost is not nearly as bad some people think it is. a quick upgrade with a flammenwerfer will set a lot of things straight. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer - MG42 15 Mar 2015, 23:26 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Mar 2015, 22:44 PMVuther That sounds pretty much exactly like the Maxim...at least the 42 has some chance of suppressing a blob with spotters, the Maxim basically doesn't suppress blobs with how bad its AoE suppression is. Im not talking about its aoe here. nobody is stupid enough to blob against a mg. what im talking about is that despite having a larger arch it can technically not use it. its suppression and gun traverse is to low . so when it comes to suppressing units that are spread out the mg42's performance is as good as the maxim's. yet the maxim has no tear down time is twice as fast with setup and doesnt need to face as many anti mg abilities. So once the question can be asked why use the mg when you can have a gren squad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer - MG42 15 Mar 2015, 22:41 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Mar 2015, 15:53 PMNapalm I remember these days as well. There will always be that element that want the return to those days. You didn't remember because it never happened. and if you are still convinced they happened then i want the a truckload of the stuff you are smoking. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer - MG42 15 Mar 2015, 22:39 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Mar 2015, 22:20 PMelchino7 I'm gonna put it simple for you: what is your problem with the vid? We can't see the supression time and i just explained why the pin took so long. Unit in cover + reload mg after 4th burst. Considering the weaknesses the mg42 has to the maxim it can only suppress one squad max . Thats a problem. Why bother with a mg that can suppress one unit tops. you can just as well take one extra gren squad. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OstheerFix!14 Mar 2015, 19:22 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2015, 18:35 PMKatitof You're such an idiot after years of training or its a natural gift? OP posted wrong list that could replace HMG with terminator squad and 222 with light tank, then he edited it and mentioned his mistake and took out changes that would make you and sierra wet. This is why you actually READ the WHOLE thread before making a comment, otherwise you make yourself look like total moron. LOL tittitof i was responding to the original post of the op. In: Lobby
Thread: OstheerFix!14 Mar 2015, 19:21 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2015, 18:48 PMelchino7 Someone didn't read the original post (which was later edited). It also had 80 more hp and something else. Anyway the list he posted now is WAY MORE REASONABLE that what he original posted. Oh i approved that 221 as well it only needed a fuel slightly higher fuel and mp increase . The point im trying to make is that a unit should be looked on the whole not just armour and dps. In: Lobby
Thread: OstheerFix!14 Mar 2015, 17:55 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Mar 2015, 02:39 AMelchino7 -Did you at least increase the cost +130mp +5f for the 221? (to match the cost of the M20) Have you forgotten that the m20 has mines smoke a free zook and if i remember correctly better penetration on its gun? In: Lobby
Thread: OstheerFix!14 Mar 2015, 17:54 PM OP ignore the allied whinegirl fest here. The mg42 is over the top take the current mg42 and look at the vet 2 of the current mg42. at vet the mg42 is balanced and actually a solid unit. remember vet 2 is 20% suppresion and traverse. Tested the 221. and guess what its actually useful. good job. In: Lobby
Thread: WEHRMACHT=RUBBISH12 Mar 2015, 21:32 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2015, 18:35 PMKatitof You have no slightest idea what you are talking about here. And if you are serious, you should be constantly spamming forums for KT nerfs first because allied AT is weaker and KT got more armor and health, the only disadvantage, speed is completely nullified by vet1 and it completely obliterates armor and infantry in much shorter and more reliable matter then tiger and IS-2 and panther put together. If you expect to stop IS-2 with a single source of AT you are equally naive as allies expecting to stop tiger with single jackson or SU-85. No tittitof you are wrong. Lets recap the su85 has 60 % chance of penetrating a tiger 53% for the jackson. the panther on the other hand has a penetration value of 70 % against the is2. But that doesnt make them better AT. as both the jackson has 50 % of the damage output of a single panther. second part they are way cheaper. you can easily have 2 jacksons/su85 for every panther. so in short the tiger is going to face 3 times more dps then an is 2. its time the is2 armour get brought down to 300 along the same line as the tiger. Recap : the su in its current state have the following advantages over the: they have better infantry, better support weapons , better medium tanks , better heavy tanks and better teching. The only pro's for the ostheer is that they have better handheld AT and each BP has a a selction of AT and AI. In: Scrap Yard
Thread: WEHRMACHT=RUBBISH12 Mar 2015, 18:23 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Mar 2015, 17:03 PMAustralian Magic Jadpanzer can deal with everything except ISU. Puma is very good vs Sherman or T34. . No they cannot deal with the i2 and neither can the tiger or the panther. its more of an issue that the is has way to much armour for its price and less weaknesses then the KT In: Scrap Yard