That is a joke right? I couldn't care less about what you have to say. That's exactly what I said. You're not worth talking to. At all. Your attempts at pissing me off are pathetic. That's thick skin, not the other way around. And if CoH2 community isn't nice, you're part of the problem.
Well you do otherwise you wouldn't have responded doesnt change the fact that you no knowledge of the game |
We think exactly the same about Ostheer. Good for us!
And your attitude and raging fits like a child makes it hard to take you seriously. It's also pretty arrogant to say that 1v1 is the only place where any semblance of balance exists, or where the concept of it is important.
But you've proven time and time again you are not worth discussing with. That's not what you want. You're here to throw fits and insults. I believe we are done, let us not clog this thread further.
Edit: Thanks for the exposure to my thread, by the way. Maybe we'll get more people eager to join the discussion.
aw poor you! got your feelings hurt? i suggest you get used to it because the coh 2 community just isnt that nice. get a thicker skin kid. |
1v1 is the least played game mode in all of CoH2.
Take your pointless minority with the ego complex elsewhere, scrub. learn to play a game with the complexities of more than one player, not this easy mode 1v1.
Because their you actually need foresight planning and complete knowledge of your faction. most 2vs2 players would not last 15 minutes against a decent 1vs 1 player. and lololololol at tactical depth its much more about covering each other weak points. |
Not really? I agreed with them, and suggested a fuel cost increase. Left a note asking what they thought of that, and the response was more identical posts talking about how terrible of a player I must be.
Honestly this is pretty pathetic, you're like the 5th guy trying to pile on me for something I already admitted my mistake in. Get over it, and if you actually want to discuss with me, instead of doing these pathetic attempts at pressing my buttons, be constructive. I have nothing against constructive criticism and I actually listen to it. What I don't listen to are people who complain, insult, provide no solution, and do it for a complaint I already agreed with.
Anyway this thread is about Ostheer and not your grievances with me, so PM me if you want to continue this.
Dude GTFO of the 2vs2 games because thats for srubs . play a least a 100 games with each faction in 1 vs 1 . your input currently is flawed as you do not understand the basic strengths and weaknesses of each faction.
If you believe the 85 is only slightly better then the p4 you are wrong. and shows you do not even understand the units and i cannot take you seriously.
The only thing the ostheer needs btw is a 222 with more impact that can actually really maul infantry and LV's and a stug who is a dedicated TD. the rest requires only minor tweaking. |
One shreck per con squad, and also they become immune to freezing.
The german tears. They would be so real.
not really |
Because we disagree? Okay then.
No because you are wrong. Your balance suggestion you made in this thread
http://www.coh2.org/topic/31533/proposed-soviet-tech-system
shows how badly you understand this game and its units. everybody is calling you out on it especially on the t-70 and you have the gall to basically disagree with everyone. |
Unappealing? Please, try using these tiers. SU-76 and T-34/76 are outshadowed by doctrinal units, but that doesn't mean they aren't utterly worthless in the first place.
85 is a slightly better Panzer IV with none of the frills, so yeah.
Also, no, most Soviet doctrines don't actually have call-in vehicles. A lot don't have call-in infantry either. Not to mention Guards Rifle Infantry are hardly spectacular compared to Axis basic and call-in infantry.
Shock Troops cost 10 MP less than Obersoldaten but the difference? Probably for another thread.
Fausts you are so far removed from reality its not funny to watch. |
Is there any proof that Relic stated that the Soviets are meant to be reliant on doctrines?
Or is it just a myth perpetuated by axis fanboys in order to make sure Soviets are always a badly designed faction.
Relic developers themselves have said so. and if you look on the doctrines nearly every single one of them has callins. the idea was you choose either tier 3 or 4 and use the callins to cover up any weaknesses. however they buffed the 85/i2/su sherman to such heights that tier 3 and 4 became very unappealing. |
Grens are well trained troops compared to Volks so no I don't think they should be priced at 235MP. I don't see anything wrong with Grens at the moment but against Rifles I would say they need a buff. Gren are designed for long range combat and even than Rifles have the "slight" edge. Grens need a long range accuracy and damage modifier.
Grens are perfectly fine on the individual basis and is one of the most cost effective infantry in the game i look upon efficiency per man and not per squad and what the squad can do. technically the gren is best performing base infantry in the game with good dps and special abilities as well as good upgrades . but because of their 4 man nature they wipe a bit to fast. i wouldn't mind seeing grens costing 300 mp and becoming a 5 man squad.
|
But in 4v4 meta is a way more flexible than in 1v1/2v2.
In 2v2, not to mention 1v1, you cant go for Panther and Howitzer or something like that.
In 4v4 you can do whatever you want to try without loosing the game.
Panther + doctrine support (without Tiger) is a great way to play efficiently in 4v4.
Thats because of economics. even the larger 4vs 4 maps have around the same amount of points. yet each side has 1k mp income so making a few fuel point is not a bad idea . also callins have less impact their. |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
