Profile of sevenfour

@Strummingbird:
Why global?
Why not a per unit upgrade?

When I used the term global, I actually meant per unit upgrade. I really regret using the word global now

However global vs per unit could be an interesting discussion also.

PPSH upgrade now costs 40 munitions instead of 20. Did I miss that in patchnotes somewhere or was that a stealth change?

Huh? Haven`t seen that in any patchnotes. *goes in game to check it out*

The HMG42 is just fine.

The overuse of rng criticals and the decreased suppression make it pretty easy to just walk up to an mg and throw a molotov - poof, gone.

While flanking or using 2 squads against 1 HMG yes, but that is the way it should be. It doesn`t happen that a conscript squad would just walk through the arc like np. Plus the RNG works both ways, I just had a game where a guy threw molotov on my HMG, did a little bit of dmg, no deaths, I didn`t even need to reposition.

All you had to do, was answer reasonably to reasonable questions about your proposal.
You xhose not to.
My questions didnt derail anything.

Okey I know you are trolling as usaual but for the sake of the argument... Saying something is unreasonable is not an argumnet. That is only your opinion and you are welcome to think so.

Btw you keep on editing your original response which doesn`t look reasonable or fair to me

Once again - what you are describing in 1) and 2) as an undesirable result of the change IS ALREADY THE SITAUTION IN GAME TODAY. PPSH + guards/shocks, or PPSH + merge etc. that is already in the game. So that is NOT a result of the proposed change. The result would be only more variability, therefore more fun. If you say that is not fair, you are saying the game is already not fair and PPSH should be made mutually exclusive to other things you mention. Do you want that? Then be a man and propose it straightaway.

3) would work if you could use Penals INSTEAD of Conscripts which you can`t so you will still be left with bunch of useless Conscripts later on.

There you go, the same response only in more words.


@Hammer

spamming 10 conscripts all with ppshs doesnt really sound like it would give more variety

Once again, already in the game. PPSH as a gobal upgrade doesn`t change anything in this aspect. Otherwise I agree with making Penals more viable, perhaps lower the cost and adjust/nerf them accordingly.
__________________________________________________________________________
All you guys are arguing for is for people to continue picking Guards Rifle Combined Arms / Soviet Shock Army in every game.

1) How would that be fair asymmetrically considering native Merge and Oorah?

2) How would that be fair considering Commander Sov infantry choice options?

3) Arent Penals supposed to be fulfilling the role you are trying to globally make universal on Cons, which at cost, already are more cost effective than Grens?

1) and 2) Of course it would be fair. Soviets have PPSHs on Conscripts already anyway, it just limits your commander options.

3) No.