Imagine if it did major damage, every 90 sec.
It's fine how it is imo. Just shoot in ze damn circle!
I would be statisfied if it did any damage at all... |
|
I agree with Porygon. Artillery in this patch is underwhelming to say the least.
Especially against ISU/Ele if you wanna do some damage to the surrounding at-guns n mgs. From a distance you won't hit shit and closing in is not a very good idea.
The other problem is the cooldown. It is just too long on both, Katusha and Pwerfer.
I found it good that they reduced the amount of shells fired per barrage on the on map arty, but now they should reduce the price or the cooldown.
|
|
Great work ZERO! Thanks! |
|
One player goes guard/sniper the other 3-4 cons/maxim/zis/ppsh. With this build you should be able to handle grens pretty well, depending on what map you play on.
Use button, at-nades, (mark target) combined with At-guns and tanks to get rid of the Tiger(s) |
Am I crazy or are the LoS's totally borked on Rails and Metal? Had a pretty bad game against ISUs, which I tried to counter with eles but it didn't work because my ele could never get a shot at them. Well not never, but it would frequently have actual LOS against them from it's own scope, yet be unable to fire. I had to practically move it past the mid VP to actually get a shot, which was inadvisable for obvious reasons.
LoS on R&M is bugged in the same way the langres hedges are. attack ground should solve the problem. |
|
It
is
not
cost-effective. |
Semoski is a terrible map, you're supposed to vote it out.
As if it were any better on rails&metal, rzhew, minsk etc.... There go your vetos |
Of course it does. My message was just as provoking as Kronosaur0s's. I was saying it's also possible to flank ISU and was asking why did he state that it's automatically gg wp.
Good luck flanking an ISU-152 in 2v2 on Semoski. |
|
Bring pryprjet winter n summer back to the 2v2 automatch pool11!!1! Kappa |
I voted no. Not because I think the call-in system is fine, but because I want another solution.
I love the ideas cruzz posted in his thread. Here are his ideas, mixed with some of mine:
1) Make call-in tanks require tech to call in.
2) For Germans, Pumas and STUGIIIEs should require BP2. Tigers and Elephants should require BP3.
3) All soviet call-in thanks should require either T3 or T4 to be build.
4) T34/85 changed to single call-in (the tech requirement would make it overly difficult to obtain these tanks when taking their performance into account).
At the moment I feel most call-in tanks (ISU/ele excluded..) are rather balanced for their price. However, because stock tanks are so expensive to tech to, there is no reason for soviets or germans to tech to T3/T4. You are just shooting yourself in the foot by teching to tanks. You can tech and get a single T34/76 / P4, or, you can spend the same amount of fuel OR LESS and get a vastly superior heavy tank.
With the tech-requirement for call-in tanks, a single T34/76 or P4 would no longer be more expensive than a IS-2 or Tiger. This would make the mid-game much more interesting than the 'spam infantry -> call in (heavy) tanks' 1v1 meta we have now.
+1
I would also prefer this solution. |
0
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
