Profile of Porygon

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 2779

General Information
Steam: 76561198067678314
Game Name: Porygon


Thread: My real problem with COH310 Dec 2021, 05:47 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Dec 2021, 10:26 AMKlement Pikhtura Changes from when I started playing back in early 2019: ISU was OP af with 70 range HE - 24/7 mid VP camp machine was nerfed . Cons were decent only in 6 first minutes of the game and pretty much not worth building late game - was fixed. Calls-ins (e.g. command panther stall without Panzer HQ) - got fixed. Heavy tanks are decent now, not op, not useless, but can be actually used. 1 click counter barrage - removed. Self spotting heavy TD - fixed Multiple "swiss knife" level commanders that could counter Armor and arty - fixed. Grens and Pgrens were squishy, thus making most of OST infantry expensive to maintain late game - fixed OKW healing became more affortable OKW ober timing improved. t70 got nerfed Lots of units became useful (g43 grens, Assgrens, 120mm, KV1 come to mind), UKF has lots of variety and the list goes on. And that what came to mind. Please someone read the list and tell with a straight face that balance team is worse then what relic did and is biased towards one side/faction. I prefer the OKW when they were release than the braindead A move German Protoss faction here now. In: Lobby
Thread: Buff Volley Fire8 Nov 2021, 06:46 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Jul 2021, 18:28 PMHannibal I agree, the ability is fairly useless. With the easier accessibility of MGs since the tech rework, it could probably be removed and replaced with something more interesting. Don't know what that could be though. Like COH1 PE G43 instaPin? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: When Relic call that an anti-tank gun4 Nov 2021, 10:22 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Nov 2021, 10:11 AMSander93 I disagree. A heavy like the IS-2 comes with such a high tech and unit cost nowadays that a (few) cheap T3 unit(s) should not be enough to counter it. It should require an equal time+resources investment (T4 + Panther/Tiger/Elefant) to reliably counter it. The StuG is an intermediate medium tank counter, not a high tier end game TD. It has no business taking on (super)heavies. That's why COH2 is silly in this aspect. If late game units are totally immuned to earlier units then why should you preserve your lighter armours? COH is different from other RTS that every units should be useful in any stage of the game and the core idea should be preserving them. Look at AOE4, Hand Cannoneers can be countered by the most basic Archers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: When Relic call that an anti-tank gun4 Nov 2021, 01:51 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2021, 17:35 PMVipper PLS explain exactly which unit in your opinion should have deflection and how much that damage would be and which units should always hit their targets. Both armor and accuracy are key mechanics of the game so pls explain why and how you would like to change them. In COH1 Tetrarch swarms would easily kill a Panther and that was bad design. What's the problem, count how many Tetrarch you required to effectively killing a panther. One or two mines is enough screwing up the Tetrach swarm. COH1 was designed like Allies using lighter, cheaper, faster tank swarming the Axis cats, same with M10 and M18 Hellcats, but not dumb thing like SU-85 you just sit there and A-move. You can kamikaze a M8 with mines to the panther, blocking it, blowing up his tread and finish up with M10s. 1-2 M10s frontal A-move assualt will never work. That's what COH2 had dumped down the whole standard of gameplay but I guess it is Eastern Front and the German & Russian doing it in that way. If you micro correctly in COH1 you should be able to circle strafing the Axis cat which your lighter tank moving faster than the cat's turret. Of course it only works if the axis player didn't have Grens and Pak support. Pre-OKW/US COH2, we did it the same way with T-34/76 /85. Guess the gameplay meta wasn't as stall and boring like nowadays that *every single game are like mainline infantry -> 2 MG -> 2 ATG -> medium tank -> late game tank.* Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2021, 21:55 PMKlement Pikhtura As I see it, this change would make a lot of units less viable e.g. panther, any TD, Puma, AEC, most heavy tanks etc. Players are still complaining that several units are useless, like m10 and SU76, imagine if that amount of units triples after adding this feature. Yep, back in those time, (huge T4 cost) Panther was a waste of manpower, isn't fast, rigid like a Leopard 2 in current state. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: When Relic call that an anti-tank gun3 Nov 2021, 16:28 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2021, 12:27 PMKlement Pikhtura Imo deflection won't work in coh2, just because it requires a major overhaul of the balance. As was said before, you could just build a swarm of t34s and kill anything. This also makes armor and penetration stats less valuable. Current system works good. There are few units like ISU, Ele and JT that could use an armor nerf with tweaks to m1 57mm ability, but otherwise the tanks/TD/AT dynamic works good imo. During pre-OKW/US-COH2, you could just build a swarm of t34s (with good flanking and mine sweeping) and kill anything. Why not? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: When Relic call that an anti-tank gun3 Nov 2021, 16:25 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2021, 09:20 AMVipper From my experience from COH1 I can say that giving all units deflection damage it would be a bad change. Have you even seen or used Tetrarch spam? When units like that get a critical mass they simply overrun everything. One could give specific units or specific abilities to unit that provided deflection damage but that should be limited. 6 upgunned Hotchkiss killing a Pershing in 10 seconds? Yes, I definitely did that around 2007, but dude, you misunderstood the concept, mass upgunned Hotchkiss meant to be able to penetrate and vaporizing any US armour, not even the Pershing able to withstand this. Nothing to do with deflection damage here. And, no matter how many "Faghounds" Brits built, he just can't beat a Panther. This prove you are wrong about those Panzer II / IS2 example. Jump back to quoted post1 Nov 2021, 00:05 AMPorygon They should make it like COH1 that bouncing shot should at least having some damage. Miss and bouncing shot is so frustrating. Hmm, just like the 57mm (the same gun) shooting the KT would do SOME damage if it is not penetrating, what else? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: When Relic call that an anti-tank gun1 Nov 2021, 00:05 AM They should make it like COH1 that bouncing shot should at least having some damage. Miss and bouncing shot is so frustrating. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OST sniper need nerf.22 Oct 2021, 01:27 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2021, 16:06 PMvgfgff Congrat with your rank. I used to be in same place as you as UKF until I met with sniper continuously 8 games. Did you met with skilled sniper yet? I will be grateful if you send me a replay to show how you manage to catch sniper. End of topic other than this let balance team decide on sniper. may we met in game someday. Just make a bait, some tasty squad luring him to snipe, luring him to "appear", countersnipe, done No snipers? same, bait, locate him, sneak to retreat path by true sight, using light vehicle or anything having high accuracy to snipers (pathfinder, JLI, commandos, stormtroopers, etc) Or just lazy blob a-move into it, how hard could it be? COH2 snipers can't do anything really productive to fusiliers blob. COH2 snipers are too fragile, micro-intensive and siutational dependant. Ostheer Sniper -> Soviet, a joke, good luck sniping the cheap cons Ostheer Sniper -> US, better. Ostheer Sniper -> Brit, ultra-effective Soviet Sniper -> Ostheer, OK Soviet Sniper -> OKW blobby, a joke, good luck against blob Brit Sniper -> Ostheer, Good Brit Sniper -> OKW blobby, lol, better utility against their LV though In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OST sniper need nerf.21 Oct 2021, 16:01 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2021, 14:57 PMvgfgff I know. I pulling a playercard because you never said how to? just said It is easy to.......... meanwhile. I put real Scenario that I've met like sniper behind grenadier and mg. other than this I do have put Scenario that when my sniper behind penal and my opposite can't kill my sniper too. and I asking How you mange to kill sniper in this Scenario ? Did you give me na answer? If you give a trip in first place I will really appreciated. here another thread which may be explained this issue better than me. https://www.coh2.org/topic/109435/thoughts-about-snipers You really enjoying shitposting instead of playing, aren't you? Well I don't share this interest, good luck. Anyway, I got rid some of the "placement". In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OST sniper need nerf.21 Oct 2021, 14:09 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Oct 2021, 13:19 PMFelixTHM UKF sniper is just as cancerous. Only counter OKW can use is JLI, or just blob his cutoff non-stop. I don't know what ranks you guys play at but for the past couple of years I've not killed a sniper with an LV and I've not lost a sniper to an LV because snares and mines exist. There's like a 1 minute window to kill Ost sniper before 222 arrives, and grens literally have a 20 range snare. It's hell on earth as USF vs Ost sniper. Only reason OKW doesn't suffer as much now is that JLI serve the counter-snipe role reasonably well. Paths with their 40% crit just don't cut it. Maybe at Porygon's skill level he's fighting vs mg42 spammers so he doesn't feel it as much but snipers are still incredibly hard to deal with for the WFA factions, mainly USF. FYI, so many years ago though. In: COH2 Balance