Profile of Abdul

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 896

General Information


Thread: Are kubelwagens OP12 Sep 2014, 05:52 AM Jump back to quoted post12 Sep 2014, 05:51 AMbraciszek ... "Normal MG units" can unpack and redeploy elswhere safely as well... disabling a unit's purpose is countering it... which does not happen with kubel because it does not need to setup and will continue to suppress. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are kubelwagens OP12 Sep 2014, 05:27 AM Relic over buffed that unit for its role and cost. Now you see people spending their whole first 5 minutes of the game just microing that unit and getting kills and map control. Relic should have fixed the pathing issues first then checked its performance before over buffing it like they did with this patch. Now it has the best performance of any early vehicle and cost 0 fuel. Introducing a fuel cost would be better but will not fix the problem. Because right now its so good you can gain back the fuel investment in no time with the easy map control you get from using it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: kubal has been buffed can we plz fix this truckpushing 11 Sep 2014, 20:55 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2014, 20:43 PMBulgakov don't reduce health, just make it come after 1 minute I am guessing they have not done that already because some noobs like to build their building first in 3v3 and 4v4? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: kubal has been buffed can we plz fix this truckpushing 11 Sep 2014, 20:33 PM There was a big thread about this recently with many solutions suggested. I am surprised that relic has not addressed this problem yet. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Panther Buff11 Sep 2014, 19:11 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2014, 19:03 PMgroconrs since the update april 24th.not the same vet 2 for panther ,onli 10 % armor buff and 160 more health http://community.companyofheroes.com/forum/company-of-heroes-2/company-of-heroes-2-general-discussion/67-coh-2-changelog/page3 Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2014, 19:04 PMSarantini Both panthers get 10% mroe armor and 160 more HP Vet2: +10% armor +160 HP +40% turret rotation speed Thanks for the clarification. That means this guide needs updating: http://www.coh2.org/topic/12778/veterancy-guide In: Lobby
Thread: Panther Buff11 Sep 2014, 18:50 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2014, 18:40 PMgroconrs vet0 armor 320, vet2 352 + 160 health The figure you list is the vet 2 bounce for the OKW panther. The one I listed above is the vet 2 bounce for OST panther which gets a 30% increase in armor (320x1.3=416). In: Lobby
Thread: Panther Buff11 Sep 2014, 18:11 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2014, 17:35 PMThe Silver Sage I completely agree with you on this point Abdul. Making these units more accessible will increase gameplay variety and avoid this issue where costly units become very hard to take down or as I like to call it the ''heavy vehicle effect''. Rather than increasing armour (to the point where dedicated AT really struggles) the price should have been reduced. Yes I would like to be able to build this tank in 1v1 without having to lose the teching race like it is now for Ost. Afterall, this tank provides a very unique role, the ability to penetrate heavy tanks, which the t3 can't do. Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2014, 18:01 PMJHeartless I think teching and DPs should have went up. Not armor. Because at Vet 2..... Edit: Teching cost went down. You bring a very good point. vet0 armor is 310, vet2 armor 416!!! In: Lobby
Thread: Panther Buff11 Sep 2014, 17:25 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2014, 08:24 AMButcher The main issue with the SU-85 was that it could spot for itself. The Panther can´t use its range to that extend. It should be this hard to penetrate frontally or it would remain a glorified Panzer IV. The same way you don´t attack a SU-85 with a Panzer IV frontally, you shouldn´t attack a Panther frontally and expect to win. That was one issue, the other one was armor. Before the last nerf (Apr 24) the SU85 had a front armor value of 180 (p4 had very hard time penetrating). Since then it was reduced to the current 140. High armor values should not be so prevalent in the game. They make game play stale when your AT guns' and tank destroyers' shots constantly bounce. And in the Panther's case it's even worse because the tank has good speed and high armor. That tank needs its cost/teching reduced not its armor increased. In: Lobby
Thread: HMG bug11 Sep 2014, 17:12 PM lol, and I thought I was seeing things! Today in one game I hit a maxim that was in the process of retreating with a rifle grenade and it stopped. I was doubting what I saw, but now it clear what happened. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Panther Buff11 Sep 2014, 03:44 AM I am not sure if its mg has been improved. As others have also pointed out its teck cost is the main problem for Ost. If this problem is solved it should have a lower armor value, lower than 290 in fact. Otherwise we will end up having something similar to the old SU85 where it was fast, long range, high penetration, and high armor. Everyone complained about it back then, but you don't see people complaining about thew panther yet because its teching cost makes it less common than the SU85 was. In: Lobby