Profile of Cardboard Tank

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 978

General Information


Thread: King Tiger 12 Nov 2015, 17:26 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Nov 2015, 16:51 PMImagelessbean This is taken well out of context then. Since you should have had 2 TWP ready, and one stun shot ready from the Stug. Any of these would stop the guns firing and give the paks time to blast away. By the time the Croc makes its appearance you must have vet surely? One TWP hit and the croc would have died because you would have eaten it up. Even if the Croc was over perferming, that would never give the KT the right to over perform in its own way. The KT is a rare unit by design. It is still quite a show stopper when it gets fielded. Making your opponent invest heavily in AT and combine it all in one area of the map to stop you is a strategic advantage, exploit it. Are you seriously suggesting you are supposed to lose the game as Axis the moment you lose a vet Pak? You know that Paks are easy to kill and slow? Here is what happened: They were all burnt by the Croc beforehand. Melting through them in 5 secs. In: Lobby
Thread: King Tiger 12 Nov 2015, 00:11 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Nov 2015, 17:09 PMNuclear Arbitor but the churchill is not OP; the only reason people have problems with it is because they don't have enough hard AT. the churchill by itself does very little damage Tell that to the Croc that just 30 minutes ago drove up to 2 Paks and a StuG and annihilated both Paks within 10 seconds and could still escape the StuG with a third health left. For a moment there I thought I had a massed AT wall. In: Lobby
Thread: Why OKW has resource penalties - Justification?8 Nov 2015, 15:16 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Nov 2015, 13:42 PMTAKTCOM Nice you put words in my mouth I never wrote by editing my quote. OKW does not have stronger troops any longer. The Vet5 system is flawed and in some cases even worse than regular Vet3 - as people showed you. In some cases it is on par and in the few cases where it is better, it is so only by a small margin. As Butcher told you it is even harder to get to Vet5 than to Vet3, making it arguably worse in the end. Totally not justifying the resource penalty. Stop living in denial. In: Lobby
Thread: Why OKW has resource penalties - Justification?8 Nov 2015, 10:19 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Nov 2015, 06:26 AMTAKTCOM Best tech options + non-doctrinal KT is in no way a reason for the resource penalty. People backed up their arguments and proofed you wrong. You are making excuses. Oberkommando is the weakest faction at the moment and for a reason. That reason is not having an equal compensation for the income penalty. In: Lobby
Thread: Relic Stream Recap5 Nov 2015, 20:31 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Nov 2015, 19:59 PMStormless - Player reporting & LoL Dota style rating of allies and opponents should be coming! So, I lose a game and can take revenge by giving the opponent 0 points for "bad behavior"? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Remove ML-20 from the game 3 Nov 2015, 17:14 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Nov 2015, 11:52 AMAustralian Magic It's not bad but it should be better than LeFH. Currently it's not. Why? They are both 600mp units. They should be equal in cost efficiency but different. 105 firing faster, ML-20 doing more damage. The only problem I see with the ML-20 is the Recon + Dive bomb combination. A first start (at least for 1v1) would be to take away either the recon or dive bomb from the Elefant and CAS doctrine respectively. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Yay. Axis team game is hopeless now.3 Nov 2015, 09:39 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 00:09 AMButcher OKW has been nerfed from the game. What is the use of a faction that is designed around a resource penalty to give you less units on the field, if those units are barely on par with British units, even outperformed for cost in quite some cases? This should get more attention. Why does the OKW have to deal with such problems yet does not receive any reward for that? The 5 vet levels are solely hypothetical on units like Panthers and barely justify the resource penalty. Better units for OKW are a thing of the past. Thus the faction as a whole is unattractive. One of the following solutions would be adequate: - Lower the vet requirements especially for OKW vehicles, so vet 5 is actually something in the game and not some vague argument to keep OKW weak. - Cut the fuel penalty to about 75-80% income. Jump back to quoted post3 Nov 2015, 05:20 AMl4hti buff kruppsteel and porche relic pls. nerf allies pls. allies very op. And this is exactly what is wrong with this forums. Trolls just shouting the standard "Krupp Steehl", "Wehraboo" bullshit without posting any argument. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: First Polish Army on East 11 Oct 2015, 22:58 PM Jeez, just use the Osttruppen. There you have your Poles. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New Panzerwerfer25 Sep 2015, 08:37 AM Hi, I didn´t have much time on my hands to play the latest patch. Thus I have never built the new Panzerwerfer. Now I´m asking you: Is it finally useful with the latest buff? Does it hit on range? Did the role change? Afaik it got slightly less scatter and suppression. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: JagdTiger and Elephant need counters19 Sep 2015, 20:35 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Sep 2015, 19:15 PMKatitof It might be a shocker for you, but both JT and ele have enough range to never extend themselves so much for anything to ever threat the rear armor and are durable enough for actual AT infantry to kill whatever will jump on them quickly. Truly spoken like someone who never used those vehicles. One wrong move and they get caught. Lose the support one time and they are sitting ducks. Even if you keep them in save distance they can still be swarmed by multiple tanks. With their super slow rate of fire they cant get out enough shots. Throw in the JT being constantly stunned and you have yourself a gamble. The Elefant has a whopping 10 range more than a Su-85, while being pretty much half as mobile. i3f the enemy pursues he can catch those vehicles pretty easily. In: COH2 Balance