I like that |
Ah I forgot a "." at the beginning of the adress. My position is #1461 |
I can't get my link to work. I followed the instructions of Pinguino132. Oh well will just wait till next week. |
The answer is different for every element of defenses you can build.
I usually have no time to build much barb wires, tank traps, sandbags etc.
I do place OKW mines, but only rarely do I get them to hit the targets I want to hit. When infantry triggers it it is usually a waste, because only 2 models or so get killed. I usually want them to hit tanks. Another risk is that they can be destroyed by indirect fire or may even hit my own tanks when retreating over them. Still, I build them if I can afford them.
Wehrmacht Teller Mines are expensive and because you need your Pioneers to also repair, build tech buildings, build caches etc. I rarely have time for this.
I rarely have luck with S-Mines so I do not really build them. May try them some point again.
Trenches do not seem very useful and I always forget that you can build them. The Flak Emplacement for OKW is simply overpriced junk.
Bunkers I build sometimes, but I place them too late usually, at that time my enemy has often little trouble to counter them. |
Don't know, my vote goes on the 45mm AT gun, but there are other units who could also win the vote. I do not think that Rear Echelons belong into this list. |
I don't know, I keep getting my squads wiped from this tank. |
Sure the HMG34 is meant to be weaker than the MG42, it is also 30 manpower cheaper, but 30 manpower is not a lot. The effectiveness difference seems a lot bigger than the price difference would justify.
It needs like 3 full bursts to supress a unit, which is so long that if you really want to rely on the unit you need two of them together all the time. Then it is not cheap anymore though. |
I think if you want to do small arms damage to those things you are better off with Sturmpioniere. Or just bite the bullet and buy a Raketenwerfer. |
"you" in my post was more like general player, not "you" specifically even though the post might have indicated so. Too many people compare them on 1v1 against each other basis and judge the balance on that, which is plain wrong approach.
Ok. I don't disagree on this point. |
And you only consider advantages and disadvantages only when Tiger is put against IS-2 and nothing else, right?
Well surprise:
Tiger isn't there to fight IS-2 exclusively, so stop making comparisons like that.
USF sherman also looses to P4, I suppose we should buff USF sherman even thou its much more powerful against infantry, but garden that, only sherman vs P4 matters and sherman looses that which is unacceptable, right?
Same with SU-85 vs JP4, I suppose we should now keep adressing SU-85 buff. OR jackson vs JP4, JP4 wins that easily, Jackson needs buff.
Silly argument?
Why?
Its being used constantly with tiger and IS-2.
Why do you imply things when you have no clue? No, I don't only consider the direct engagement. |