Profile of Endeav

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 170

General Information


Thread: pqumsieh and his faction choice13 Sep 2013, 00:35 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2013, 00:34 AMwooof i just finished playing a game against him. he was playing german. so this thread is pointless I think you left out the part where you got absolutely shat upon. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: pqumsieh and his faction choice12 Sep 2013, 19:36 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Sep 2013, 19:21 PMpanzerjager2 On the few occasions if you decide to play as Germans (I know its hard), put a panzer 4 in front of a conscript squad and notice HOW LONG it takes for the conscripts to take damage. Now do the reverse for a T34 on a gren squad and see how they get vaporized (despite the fact PZ4 is 30 fuel more expensive) You know what? No. I'm not even going to. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: pqumsieh and his faction choice12 Sep 2013, 19:17 PM I played against him on the beta with him playing ostheer. Balance beta, not the closed/open betas pre-release. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: MG42 Post Patch12 Sep 2013, 19:05 PM Jump back to quoted post12 Sep 2013, 18:55 PMpanzerjager2 mg42 is worthless now as a support weapon. Even with gren support, and firing from max range, a squad of conscripts despite under fire from the 42 with the Usain bolt oorah were able to avoid being supressed (forget pinning), managed to get behind the 42 and decrew in seconds with molotov. Maxim mean time has almost same supression , better DPS , WAY faster setup/packup time and 6 men squads. Good job Relic, the russian whiners moaned so much that mg42 is now opposite of what it was ... useless. I bet next unit we will see nerfed is Elephant because its too cheap and hampers the very hard skill su85 strategy .... Replay please. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Flanking is back!!!12 Sep 2013, 18:59 PM Relic chose to design ost support teams as squishier than their soviet counterparts. You'll have to ask them about that design decision. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: AT Grenades too effective 12 Sep 2013, 18:47 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2013, 23:45 PMgeist When I have tanks, I always watch them carefully. And Panzer IV gets engine damaged by AT-nade like 99% of the time. Don't tell me I just don't see it failing. I am not complaining about that, but please don't tell "oh it's pure luck if it cripples your P4's engine". And even Panthers get crippled by T34 ram or AT nades so goddamn often. I don't know much about the mechanics of the game, but AT-nade always hitting the rear sounds pretty legit to me. Confirmation bias. As soviet trying to at nade a IV you will also get fails, which by the same reasoning must mean that at nades NEVER work. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet AT-gun12 Sep 2013, 00:07 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2013, 23:52 PMgeist Though it's kinda funny that in battle reports somewhere is stated "ATGs had no problem hitting a 1x1m spot in 800m distance". Yeah, I see that. Could it be, that somehow (unintended) cover modifier works for tanks, too? Sometimes it feels like Pak misses several shots on T70 standing still in bomb craters. We tried. Vehicles do not have cover. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: AT Grenades too effective 11 Sep 2013, 02:38 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2013, 13:17 PMpanzerjager2 +1 if anything the patch has made AT grens stronger and fausts weaker. Not ONCE have I seen my pz4/ostwind or even panther manage to sucessfully deflect an AT gren. Compare this to the su85 consistently managing to deflect fausts. Its so fucking annoying when you try to flank those su85's, only for a hoorahing conscript squad running faster than Usan Bolt to magically AT gren your panther in the 1st shot. SU-85 frontal armor: 180; Panzerfaut Penetration: 140 = 78% chance to penetrate Panzer IV frontal armor: 160; AT-Nade penetration: 100 = 62.5% chance to penetrate AT nades hitting rear armor cannot be quantified, but it isn't that it happens 100% of the time. AT nade fails plenty on Panzer IV. Nevermind trying to AT nade a panther or a tiger. You have some serious bias in all your posts. Deflection damage means that whenever either of these weapons fail to penetrate for the engine crit, they will instead deal their deflection damage. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Soviet AT-gun11 Sep 2013, 01:32 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2013, 01:27 AMpanzerjager2 OH look a 5 post wonder russian troll who setup a new account ... Why do you keep ignoring the fact that they have the same accuracy? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: @ Relic why was Tiger nerfed ????11 Sep 2013, 01:16 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2013, 00:56 AMpanzerjager2 IS2 needed a buff and got a BIG one .... now it can not only massacre infantry but can take on panthers 1 v 1. But Tiger got a minor buff (reload) and a bigger nerf (armor/max speed) .... Really RELIC ???? I know the official forums are full of russian trolls whining that their side cant roflstomp Germans but was it really necessary to buff one side's heavy tank and kinda nerf the other ? Tiger STILL does more DPS than an IS-2. In: COH2 Balance