Profile of Endeav

Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2014, 10:13 AMCruzz

Spreadsheet is wrong, ostheer panther gun has the same 1 second wind down as the OKW one.

| | reload: {
| | | duration: {
| | | | max: 6.4f;
| | | | min: 6.1f;
| | | };

| | reload: {
| | | duration: {
| | | | max: 6.7f;
| | | | min: 5.8f;
| | | };

Jump back to quoted post30 Aug 2014, 15:17 PMJinseual

I don't see any difference between the OKW Panther and the Ostheer Panther, except that the OKW Panther cost more on fuel because of the low fuel income OKW has and it can get to vet 5 which is probably a reasonable price compared to the Ostheer Panther.

| | accuracy: {
| | | far: 0.025f;
| | | mid: 0.0375f;
| | | near: 0.05f;

| | accuracy: {
| | | far: 0.035f;
| | | mid: 0.045f;
| | | near: 0.055f;

Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2014, 20:59 PMGreeb

I see plenty of OKW players stacking 3 bulletins of panzerschreks 5% cheaper.

Is that thing useful? which price will they have at the end?

| | | | | | | upgrade_cost_munition_modifier: {
| | | | | | | | $REF: "modifiers\upgrade_cost_munition_modifier.lua";
| | | | | | | | application_type: "apply_to_upgrade";
| | | | | | | | exclusive: false;
| | | | | | | | modifier_id: "";
| | | | | | | | negative_tooltip: 11001831;
| | | | | | | | positive_tooltip: 11001844;
| | | | | | | | target_type_name: "assault_pioneer_combat_upgrade";
| | | | | | | | usage_type: "multiplication";
| | | | | | | | value: 0.95f;

Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2014, 19:17 PMCannonade

Endeav: I added a paragraph while you posted.

Its not perfect, and I agree that historical accuracy is secondary, but I think this is one instance where perhaps the historical accuracy and gameplay can find a mutual solution.

IE: Dramatically reduce the rate of fire.

The wiki quite strongly highlights this issue, and I think its one that might help fit the ISU52 into the game, without having to nerf its awesome capacity, when it does infsct fire, and in reflection of all 3 roles that it played IRL, as it also does in the game.

Reduced rate of fire opens windows for infantry to survive longer, for armor to complete flanks (doesnt due shit for buildings though, but ).

Do you see what I mean? Have a read of the wiki. Especially the Heavy Tank Destroyer bit.

Cardboard Tank: You get me wrong, dude!

Im not arguing for historical accuracy! Just to take a clue feom historical accuracy, to find a possible solution that "reprrsents" the reality, ingame, while also being operable in a balanced way ingame.

So yes, no 1min reload!

But yes, perhaps some seconds added would maybe do the trick.