Profile of honeymonstis

let me put this clear:
You want a troop called conscripts (dudes without full militar training and probably armed with less than normal) to be as effective as trained SOLDIERS, some even had been in the previous World war?

ok dont start to bring history into this. For your information volksgrens and normal grens where for the most part CONSCRIPTS. OKW is supposed to be 1944 west German army and that army was made up nearly entirely of conscripts with little training (couple of weeks to a couple of months depending on the function).
oh and the US riflemen you see in the game? Guess what? They are also conscripts.... Tommies? Conscripts.

CoH does not have to be historical accurate but what it has to respect the words meaning.

What does that even mean? Something special about the word Volksgrenadier or conscript?

yes it comes much later is locked to panther only and the bonus are worse until vet 3, if it cam crippled it would be useless with the current bonuses and cost

is it worth the 40 more fuel if u put it behind tech ? 200 i can understand but 220 ?

no if its gets tied to tech I think its should have its price readjusted to reflect this

And put what in its place?

Honestly, its place in tech is quite irrelevant. The only reason it can viably come early is because OKW currently has acces to a techless call-in tank followup. Once that is gone, going for an early Stuka will delay armor significantly enough to make it very dangerous to do so.

yeah when the command panther is finally tied to tech the stuka will be more risky and balanced.

Panther is not a TD. It is a middle point between medium and heavy tank but has the speed of light tank. Sound absurd but at a really high price.

The panther is and has always been a TD first with some light AI. What does Ost and OKW get to counter tanks late? Panthers. Now the panther is pricey and I dont think they are OP but its primary function is indeed as a Tank hunter / destroyer.

And for Tommies their durability combined with damage profile of Lee-Enfields is beyond broken. If you go for MG they just get the lend lease doctrine and get Rangers with phosphorus smoke (Talking about Assault Tommies). Not to mention the SMG Tommy Clown Car.

Then fix that broken stupid doctrine.

If they don't go for the doctrine then they still have the A+ tier MG and solid line infantry with unparalled durability and a superb grenade. (When compared to axis)

So not a A+++ tier HMG as the axis one? Tommies are too durable when you get bolster and I dont think you should be able to 2x carry brens. As for the lee you could look into that and maybe lower the dps a bit.

Only thing that can really face the Tommies are the infamous Obersoldaten but at that point British player is probably dominating the map and has already put his/her Bofors to delay any push at that point.

Dont be absurd. Lots of axis units can function against Tommies. Well UKF are very good a securing and playing one part of the map. So in team games they are very good with the early bofors but they are not uncountable.

The only thing that can counter them is Luchs but it also forces your infantry to be constantly healed by medic packs dropped by Sturmpios thus delaying your mines/weapon upgrades etc.

And that is a fair trade off. Try playing other factions and you will see that the grass aint greener on the other side.

I am totally fine with the transfer of power from Tommies and Vickers to Firefly reload time and Comet viability.

You want to lower UKF AI performance and increase their AT performance? If anything you should move the AI performance on to other AI focused units to balance the faction so they cant just blob and mass tommies.

(Post is a little mixed sorry for that and if any offences, apologies)

no need to be sorry mate. Its your honest opinion.

That math makes no sense; it has no practical application in the actual game. You just divided build cost by squad size and came up with a random number. Comparatively, they are much cheaper to reinforce than all other mainlines, the next cheapest being volks at 5 more to reinforce, which is not insignificant.

no the math makes sense as it was how Relic used to add reinforce costs in all their essence engine games (DoW and CoH).
6 cons = 240 mp. That means one fresh build cons model cost 40. So reinforce cost is 50% of that. So that means its 50% cheaper to reinforce than buy a new squad. Its the same for volks.
Now for some units its different to balance the unit(see obers).
Also 5 mp difference between Volks and cons is a bit but its really not that much given how much better performance the volks have. Problem is that if you outfit the cons with better weapons the low reinforce cost becomes op. That is why the new upgrade also blocks weapon pick ups on cons.