Profile of mrgame2

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1794

General Information


Thread: IS cover bonus and Pyro9 Feb 2020, 03:38 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 14:13 PMSander93 Additionally, the new HQ medic squad will have poor healing, meant to be barely adequate to occasionally heal a support squad and allow non IS-heavy builds to function, but not enough to completely substitute healing IS. I do not expect to see a huge increase in pyrotechnics upgrades. Tightrope demo the healing on our behalf. So it needs a little micro tax BUT the manual healing is FAST The auto aoe heal while slow, seems to stack with manual healing for ultra fast 'free' healing! 21m mark https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bHCZntDLfOA In: Lobby
Thread: Are they not fixing heavies?8 Feb 2020, 13:56 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Feb 2020, 09:15 AMKatitof With IS-2 armor nerf, Tiger likely doesn't need that 5 extra range either. After all, extraordinary range on heavies is one of the problems. Even with IS2 nerf, it still has more armor than Tiger.. AND Tiger has to face cheaper 60TD with crazy amount of pen and/or damages.. hello? talk about extra ordinary ranges. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are they not fixing heavies?8 Feb 2020, 04:26 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Feb 2020, 21:16 PMAndy_RE Boy, this is a tough one to crack, mainly due to the way these units perform across modes. Some people on the balance team are advocating for final tier side tech as a more equitable solution than tying heavies to all tech buildings etc. Do people like this proposal? Also, what (if any) further nerfs do people think would be needed in conjunction with the above? Final tier side tech/costs sounds fine. You dont want to nerf or delay heavies to the point of useless-ness. We go from building heavy to no building heavy. lol whats the point. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank Destroyer Poll7 Feb 2020, 02:07 AM My suggestion is to remove its pen and rof vet bonus. Replace them with +5 sight at vet3. Hvap to 240 damage at vet 2. Relic tried to give it +5 sight earlier and hvap was 240 earlier. Without the pen vet, at least p4 and p5 armor vet makes sense. The +5 sight is similar to FF tank commander upgrade and su85 focus sight. But comes much later for jackson since it is a stronger 60Td at base. FF gets the heavy 240 damage and sight at vet0 as long you pay for it. Jackson still can do its role with base stats to reliably handle p4. Imo most can agree that Jackson is pretty good at base stats already. It doesn't need pen and rof vet. Keep the base, change the vet, will not affect the complaints that usf can't contain axis tanks. I was thinking of heavy crew repairs at vet 3 too, but i think thats too much. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank Destroyer Poll7 Feb 2020, 01:29 AM How about my proposed vet nerf ya? Base jackson is fine since its rof isnt too destructive and pen doesn't delete armour frontally. Improving sight and hvap brings it back closer to original intentions. Ya? Ya? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank Destroyer Poll5 Feb 2020, 02:25 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Feb 2020, 17:37 PMHannibal While this poll is interesting, we cannot disregard the general faction that each TD has to work in. Of course the Jackson is too good for it's price, but that's because everything else in USF loadout does not reliably deal even with a P4. I don't agree with this p4 assesment. I think even mod team don't balance around this. Imo all agree that unvet Jackson can reliably deal with p4. And the last nerf was fuel increase. That delays slightly against p4. Looking at these 2 parts. I think we can tweak around them if concern is p4. Decrease the fuel cost and look at vet bonus In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank Destroyer Poll5 Feb 2020, 01:13 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Feb 2020, 21:02 PMWingZero All these threads about Allied TDs is solely due to lower CP requirements for heavy tanks and thus the heavy tank meta in the current patch. All these post are from people that play with Grand Offensive commander almost every game Lolwut? Jackson 60td have been a topic long before the heavy tank meta. If anything, the heavy tank changes do help wehr with a little breathing room against 60td As still even by looks of 1.2 winter patch. A tiger is more efficient than brum+panther In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - Ostheer4 Feb 2020, 17:53 PM So with the slower faust, does it allows LV to escape out of followup range before getting engine damage? In: Lobby
Thread: jackson armor nerf4 Feb 2020, 17:51 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Feb 2020, 15:23 PMMazianni This doesn't fix the medium tank issue... you're just continuing your one man crusade of trying to buff the Panther. Literally pleasing nobody. What medium tank issue? Replacing its pen and rof vet with sight and stronger switchable ammo, actually impedes it from out scaling stock tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: jackson armor nerf4 Feb 2020, 14:43 PM Removing jackson vet pen and rof is a solid solution...'nobody' is generalising it. In: COH2 Balance