Profile of Bulgakov

Jump back to quoted post9 Oct 2016, 18:49 PMOutsider_Sidaroth

I say it's more like the Comet needs to be on Panther level.

Jump back to quoted post14 Jan 2017, 01:59 AMPedro_Jedi

Guys, could someone please answer if:

1) Isn't the wehr medkit going to have some price decrease?

2) Will you pretty please change the brit coded locked trench to a regular, wehr one? That shit lends itself some pretty cancerous cheesy play

Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2017, 14:40 PM__deleted__

You clearly don´t understand the concept. Enemy will have 30 seconds advantage resulting into better map presence and fighting positions.

Ostheer early game is completely different to soviet tier1 approach. For ost, you have to build tier1 in order to get anything else than HMG - core desing, while for soviets you can go cons or get tier1. Problem is that tier1 is inefficient compared to other approaches right now.

Jump back to quoted post11 Jan 2017, 10:35 AMmiragefla

I believe T1 should only have soft AT, enough to make soft-skinned vehicles have second thoughts on charging in.

I do not mind the AT satchel if it's enough to just keep vehicles from charging in and/or there's the other idea of allowing the M3 to have enough penetration to at least chip armoured cars and half-tracks from a distance.

Jump back to quoted post8 Jan 2017, 05:02 AMkingdun3284

Where is ur flame nade and stuka and isg? They are all non doctrinal. As long as the soviet player picks T1 ,you dont have to face garrisoned mg. However, usf have to face garrisoned (the most op mg in game) MG42 and MG34 with only two non-doctrinal option which is mortar (being nerf into the ground while being more expensive than the ost one) and pack howitzer.