Profile of Acidfreak

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 281

General Information


Thread: (8) Road To Arnhem6 Nov 2019, 22:25 PM The factions/commanders with early assault troops get the maximum benefit. I just played a 4 v 4 here. I was soviets airborne but i was constantly being harassed by assault grens and sturms using pio sight. Later on stg volks and shreck pgrens. My point is this map greatly benefits the early asualt troops to such an extend that enemy isn't able to recover. Especially with wider arc mgs covering the advance in case you manage to get the enemy to retreat. Also i had one AI on my side after this guy left after his sniper died. In: Map Sharing
Thread: 120mm mortars underperform!4 Nov 2019, 08:18 AM Personally i think if there's slow rate of fire then it should be accurate. Or high rate of fire and less accurate. This way the unit doesn't become OP. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How to make airborne guards better?4 Nov 2019, 05:09 AM What should be the proposed price for the unit? In: Lobby
Thread: Replace Falls' Faust with button?1 Nov 2019, 09:36 AM Jump back to quoted post1 Nov 2019, 09:31 AMToxicfirebal They shoudnt have faust in the first place I agree. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF lacking POC31 Oct 2019, 21:49 PM I like how you refer to Japanese as lowly. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How to make airborne guards better?31 Oct 2019, 21:38 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Oct 2019, 17:10 PMNorthFireZ I'm actually okay with the unit as it is right with the exception of the strafing run. Maybe bring down the cost to 40 munitions much like a Pyrosection arty flare. Airborne doctrine is already really munition based so any cost reduction would be a pretty good buff. Yes i agree. Or maybe improve the damage. I mean it's a damn plane shooting and models take near to no damage. In: Lobby
Thread: How to make airborne guards better?30 Oct 2019, 20:47 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2019, 20:43 PMT.R. Stormjäger Soviets had a bunch of Piats. Would make sense if they were given to special forces regiments. I think they serve a better role being an anti infantry squad right now. Who will want to have a 380 mp piat squad with a high reinforce cost. I believe at the very least they need a grenade buff and maybe stealth. I would argue for bazookas and piats but we already have partisans for that. But you're right. Then player can choose which kind of chaos to create behind enemy lines. Anti infantry or anti tank one In: Lobby
Thread: How to make airborne guards better?30 Oct 2019, 20:44 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2019, 20:40 PMMaret Soviets never used bazookas, while get some amount in 1941. They have much more piats than bazookas, but not used them too. IMHO, airborne should have booby trap ability in both variants - they diversion specialists, it's they work. While with ppsh will get tactic advantage instead suppresive fire. They don't have stealth like other diversion troops and you can't make combo - stealth + tactic advantage. Yes no first strike bonus found here. In: Lobby
Thread: How to make airborne guards better?30 Oct 2019, 20:42 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2019, 20:40 PMT.R. Stormjäger Obviously Are you saying a unit dropping behind enemy lines have access to lendlease weapons? I think stealth will be nice. Ppsh is already a free upgrade. In: Lobby
Thread: How to make airborne guards better?30 Oct 2019, 20:38 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2019, 20:30 PMT.R. Stormjäger That’s the one I meant. Soviets don't have bazookas unless it's some lendlease thing going on. In: Lobby