America wages wars to countries for their natural gas, and noone bats an eye.
Russia went to defend their own civilians in Osetia and everyone looses their minds thinking that Russia started a WW3.
the big difference between obama and putin:
obama is a democrat nice word play
i dont think that the american wars are right. they are bad aswell |
@crazy archer
are you trough these 150+ sources i provided? excellent, you seem to be VERY fast.
why do you say that the government worked against its own country? if he tells the truth, does he work FOR or AGAINST his country? |
Wtf do you have against Putin?
Is he your president?
Or he just makes live miserable somehow in Germany?
Did you see us criticize Merkel?
he is not a democrat, he kills people who are against him
he is not my president
he doesnt make my life miserable, but definetely the ones of many russians, georgian etc
nope, but feel free, still it would be offtopic
Lead wikipedia as an example of a quality source is beyond the human mind
wikipedia might not be the best source, but good enough. read it. please. and then tell me i was wrong or right. |
Mr. Zemskov wrote nothing about Katyn. I gave an example of lies the country's leadership
You will not believe this, but it google translator
the lies of the countrys's leadership? sowjet union lied and lied and lied, putin still lies and lies and lies.
yeah, the text didnt make any sense at all.
please, ALL of you guys, take the time and read the gnlish wiki article about the massacre of katyn. read the FULL version on ENGLISH! just do it. guys, i want to help you. seeing the lies of putin and co might open your eyes and change your live. |
Oh boy, you really are a stubborn one. Series of international military tribunals without a resolution, I do not know if I should laugh or cry, really. Thank you for this one. Quite a good joke.
Now, just for your education: http://untreaty.un.org/cod/avl/ha/ga_95-i/ga_95-i.html
the nuremberg charter set down the laws and procedures by which the Nuremberg trials were to be conducted. nothing more
edit: pls leave "stubborn" out next time. you might be frustrated, but then correct me |
independent.
If the resolution has not been changed or cancelled, than it's still in full effect and power.
no it wasnt independent for reasons barton stated.
to, its not a resolution, it was a series of tribunals. that is a difference.
and the katyn part of it was wrong. sowjet propaganda. |
That is, for example, writes Zemskov V.N. Renowned historian and researcher of political repression
Is that clear?
Khrushchev lied to her political ambitions
So do not talk about Katyn as an example of Soviet war crimes
what has mr. zemskov to do with katyn?
and did you use google translator for your source?
and why is mr. zemskov "renown"?
katyn was a sowjetish massacre. i actually believed that this is crystal clear, because so many sources show it. |
ok, so please tell me than why the resolution of Nurnberg tribunal still contains the fact that it's the Nazi Germany which executed Polish officers in than controlled territory of Katyn?
well, because the resolution of Nurnberg tribunal will always conatain this. its a historical document. but there are newer papers that state the exact opposite. |
Than why untill this day nor Germany as a successor to Fascist Germany (being an interested party), nor Poland, as being most interested party, neither any other uninterested party has not lodged a protest to this part of Nurnberg verdict?
You know, we can write whatever we want in wikipedia, books, memoires, forums and whatnot. But the resolution by the tribunal or any other court or judicial body in the modern civilised society is considered to be the ultimate truth. So...
Poland has logded a protest. the answer:
1990 Mikhail Gorbachev admitted that the NKVD had executed the Poles and confirmed two other burial sites similar to the site at Katyn: Mednoye and Piatykhatky.
other than that, many investigations show, that the sowjets did it.
So, I don't get your point?
You do believe versions of Soviet government, or don't?
You do believe Nuremberg Tribunal official statements, or don't?
Make your point.
Or you do believe only in things that you want to believe and completely ignore other - that are not comfortable to you?
i dont believe in the nürnberg-tribunal, but i do believe many sources showing, that it was a sowjet massacre
I can say that except for Western Poland attitude towards Russians is pretty tolerable, there is no hate.
i absolutely dont hate russia or russians. just to amke it clear. i just dont like it, when people dont make their own mind but believe their governments propaganda |
I see you're a smart guy. Just above you is a link to a bunch of books. Certainly read them all.
But the question is whether you've read the Nuremberg verdict?
Katyn on the list of war crimes of Nazi Germany, is not it?
as you may know, sowjet union accused nazi germany of doing this. this is its on the german list in nürnberg. still, it was done by the sowjets. thats it
still, crazy archer wants to proof all these books wrong. not me.
|