Profile of distrofio

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2358

General Information


Thread: Why maxim is trash22 Feb 2020, 15:20 PM Because OP should play axis instead. Or learn to steal HMG42s In: Lobby
Thread: Mainline infantry sandbags change22 Feb 2020, 15:16 PM It seems to some people that 2 squads of pgren is a tactical command blob. I will simply address this as a detriment of a valid argument for a balanced and strategic wise gameplay. Of course UKF will no longer have ez green cover but this game has 5 factions to balance, not 1. Yellow cover is good enough in early game and not as necessary in late game because of craters. Green cover on the other side will be the most valuable and engagements will occur around it. This also praises good map designers In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stupa (Brummbar poll) 22 Feb 2020, 04:02 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Feb 2020, 22:31 PMKubelecer I'm sorry but what? Do you drive your brummbar backwards? How funny, if it were a churchill it could go straight backwards and it would make no difference. But we are talking about axis units, they require some skill to play, you know? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stupa (Brummbar poll) 21 Feb 2020, 22:22 PM IMO an HP buff would be ideal, a stupa should tackle without trouble 1-2 ATGs, since its a luxury AI unit. Any tank can reliably force it to back off because its rear armor is not as high as heavy tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Salvage21 Feb 2020, 22:19 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Feb 2020, 10:50 AMLatch Its the fact mainline infantry have the ability, It was suggested that only sturmpio had scavenge, start reading that it is done quickly, 11 seconds is not quickly, 2 secs in some mobas is just too much time. Please consider better expressions, based on numbers rather opinions. is 100% guaranteed unless the squad gets killed, Then its not 100% guaranteed, the game has plenty of AoE skills to just deny the scanvenge, its not as easy as you might picture. that it takes the same amount of time no matter how many models and that it allows squads to eliminate a TW without having to sacrifice firepower or man power for the privilage. That is the uniqueness of the faction, deal with it. I've linked this video several times and I will as it is a good indication of how bad RNG can be at killing TW's: https://youtu.be/al8Y0sQKITU?t=17 ground elevation is also a factor, yet you dont take it into account. RNG is RNG and you just cant remove it because you dont like it. As people keep saying "Its better to just steal it than salvage it" then it shouldnt be an issue to remove the ability to salvage functional TW's. What is this even supposed to mean? It shouldnt be an issue to keep it or leave it, then simply dont fix what aint broken. I think there is not a single fact that you can hold on to keep ranting about salvage. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Guards should be more viable anti-infantry in the early game21 Feb 2020, 01:45 AM I really prefer guards being better than shocks, the former at least have a long range and defensive profile. Shocks are utterly annoying but can push like no other squad and thas useful In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Guards should be more viable anti-infantry in the early game20 Feb 2020, 20:25 PM Your reasons OP? I mean to like or wish is ok but in order to push a change you might need a little more In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer T4 Non-Combat Grenadier Buff Idea20 Feb 2020, 17:13 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Feb 2020, 16:59 PMMazianni How are people not OK with reinforce cost/time and veterancy gain buffs for thematic or whatever reasons but then perfectly fine with adding a whole extra guy to the squad at the cost of the traditional LMG upgrade? . Jaeger command squad is basically a 5 man gren with g43. The idea is not as odd as a reinforce cost reduction thematically speaking In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stupa (Brummbar poll) 19 Feb 2020, 18:51 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2020, 03:09 AMSuperHansFan How is this any different from the Churchill? You could make an argument ost repair speeds are weak but they recently got a buff in this area with minesweeper package. If it's going to be a high armor unit it should be balanced around short range engagements. Otherwise you have a situation where it can barrage safely from range but even when allied get desperate and push with mediums or premium meds they will be bouncing (no TDs can not dive high armour units in this situation and this will be a problem) Ill point you the difference (and i am not UKF main). Churchill can kill Pz4 and panthers. A brumbarr can only will a (Dead AFK) T-34. And funnily enough, the t34 flanking the stupa can actually kill it with rear armor hits. So, a churchill is a bullet sponge, a brumbarr is a tough nut. See the rear armor values to figure it out. Brumbarr is effective vs ATs (some people will say no but) yes, churchill? yes. Will brumbarr displace tanks? No. Will churchill? Maybe. Does brumbarr have smoke? Doctrinal. Churchill? Yes. The differences are subtle but show the units have different objectives In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer T4 Non-Combat Grenadier Buff Idea19 Feb 2020, 18:37 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2020, 10:03 AMVipper medic should be replaced by a better ability for grenadier. I disagree, because it gives gren some utility, when escorting HMGs they can provide some heal to it, useful for holding the line. I disagree aswell on making heal free. Its not something you simply abuse. Veteran squad gives it for free because it is a payed upgrade that locks out the LMG42 (its iconic upgrade) If grens should be buff anyway it should focus on their midgame potential, since they are not lategame oriented nor early game powerhouse. In: COH2 Balance