Profile of distrofio

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2358

General Information


Thread: Sturmpioneer schreck still costs 70 muni26 Feb 2020, 00:42 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Feb 2020, 18:52 PMHannibal Either Elite Schreck as I suggested a couple of days ago or make it non-exclusive with the sweeper. +1 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why maxim is trash26 Feb 2020, 00:38 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Feb 2020, 00:11 AMSkysTheLimit But what about going further than a rollback? Like making t2 30-40 fuel, buffing maxims, and tossing molotov tech in there with it? What you suggest is a ninja buff. I disagree strongly on buffing anymore SU. Its by far the less UP faction. In: Lobby
Thread: Why maxim is trash26 Feb 2020, 00:35 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Feb 2020, 16:33 PMMr Carmine The maxim needs to remain shit because it once got spammed and op is a very weak argument. Its not even one at all imo. The maxim spam fear argument is bs. 2 of its op defyning feutures got nerfed hard, its mobility and its supression and some more nerf where added so it sucked so hard its a waste of mp at any stage of the game. At the time cons and penals where a lot worse in preformance as well. This is the third reason people spammed it. Cons and penals no sucking anymore will not encourage spam in the slightest esp in 1v1. Now only drop its price to 240 and its still not so cheap that people will spam it. Esp not in 1v1. The maxim needs no buff to its stats. It needs a cost more inline with its preformance. Wich is the worst of the mg,s period. If you didnt i know many people that used the volks shreks Excuse when pfusies got their AT package... Double standards is a common thing here and even though i agree with you, that old maxim spam is a bad argument, it will remain valid as long as the so called "single faction heroes" demand buff for free and use the same excuse on the axis side. Its not a fair fight i must say. I will say that buffing even further the maxim is something unnecesary because its like asking MG42 to be 6 man, it just removes its weaknesses for free and leaves the game design in ashes. Maxims currently when carrisoned and with proper scouting are of respectable performance. Some Axis units have better RA bonuses or suppression bonuses to avoid being pinned down that fast. Maybe the issue is there. In: Lobby
Thread: Why maxim is trash24 Feb 2020, 23:26 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2020, 23:19 PMSkysTheLimit Well Relic + the modteam disagree because they've buffed it in 2 different patches this year Were riflemen UP that got 2 buffs in the last patch? No? Then learn the fucking difference between needing a buff because UP and promoting new play styles. In this case maxim NEEDS NO BUFF. SJ promoted a cool idea, i just agreed with it, start reading. In: Lobby
Thread: COH2 winter balance mod - discussion24 Feb 2020, 23:20 PM IMO either simply remove the panzer commander ability or make Tiger commander have a weaker version of panzer commander built in. Withouth arty call-in and maybe less sight. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Mainline infantry sandbags change24 Feb 2020, 23:19 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2020, 20:49 PMSkysTheLimit IS probably need sandbags the most, although new patch seems to be making them less cover dependent if the changes go through RE exist for a reason, like pios for grens. The map has plenty green cover at the start, no need for ultrafast RE sandbags. As i said 100 times now, mainline sandbags are replaced by a shallow tren that provides directional yellow cover. Its not hard to read rather repeat the same thing over and over again. IS is not UP and does not need "that much love" having to protect their precious SB... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why maxim is trash24 Feb 2020, 23:14 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2020, 19:24 PMSkysTheLimit This thread is about 1 unit on 1 faction. Has nothing to do with "allies UP", it is about the maxim OPs post mentions nothing about the other 2 allied factions, nor does it even say Soviets are UP Kubelwagen just got buffed over the summer and then again in september, so clearly someone was saying Kubel UP Since when you are able to play SU vs SU matches? Not to mention the other faction still exist... Hey i know the game mechanics are hard to understand but you need to try harder. Maxim is clearly OK, some people pretend more than it can do and simply rant. Anyone can post a thread and learn from the feedback, but even OP can be wrong about his opinion. I will say it again. MAXIM IS OK. It is balanced around his faction, the opposing factions, the history of the unit itself and what is ment to do. LEAVE IT IN PEACE NOW. PD: Kubelwagon was never UP. In: Lobby
Thread: Its like Usf is just super powered24 Feb 2020, 23:09 PM Jokes aside, now usf has a new configuration, more TW oriented than ever before. Sometimes adaptation is the hardest thing to do. They have weak spots yet. Condider their better infantry but also more expensive reinforce. Fight safe battles and outplay USF using solid rather than risky plays. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Its like Usf is just super powered24 Feb 2020, 23:08 PM "USF OP?" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Raketens are too good24 Feb 2020, 23:06 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Feb 2020, 20:34 PMDoomlord52 The only way this unit will ever be 'fixed' is by making it more like a normal ATG. Right now, it simply has so many 'gimmicky' trade-offs that its going to be annoying to use (or play against) in one situation or another. Agreed. But: +Available in T0 If changed, add pfaust to volks after sws is bought. +5 models Make it 4 as the rest of axis TW +Can cloak at vet 1 Removing cloak after it being nerfed is simply killing the unit, one should consider buff its mobility if so. +Can retreat This made the raketen unique and worthy of stealing. Remove this and cloack and simply just remove the raketen aswell -All 5 models 'blob' together for easy wipes, especially in cover -5 less range than any other ATG -Gun shield doesn't give cover (supposedly? might be bugged) -Need to manually toggle cloak, cloak locks the unit in place -Very inconsistent performance on bumpy ground (i.e. craters) This are the defects of the model and buggy behaviour. Sadly they cant be fixed directly. Maybe if raketen projectile performs a ballistic trajectory it could remove some of the ground collisions. Lets be clear now, Im not against your points, im just adding my opinion to continue the discussion. In: COH2 Balance