Profile of distrofio

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2358

General Information


Thread: Panzergrenadiers M24 Grenade-Bundle28 Feb 2020, 07:45 AM Unupgraded Pgren is oriented to be anti infantry with no snare. Other factions mimic the same design. Longer CD simply makes the bundle grenade useless vs infantry. I disagree about changing the bundle grenade. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why maxim is trash28 Feb 2020, 07:42 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2020, 05:54 AMmrgame2 Just lowering its costs, lower reinforcement cost, lower build/reinforced time. Just make it faster and cheaper. Done So "sprinting" pgrens are an issue but super fast cheap-o cartwheel HMG is OK? Well thats a new level of double standard. Lets make maxim cheaper then, also lower its ROF, suppression, Acc, narrow the firing cone and make its vet1 require FU instead of Amunitions. That is a legit trash maxim. In: Lobby
Thread: Sturmpioneer schreck still costs 70 muni28 Feb 2020, 07:20 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2020, 05:49 AMmrgame2 Yep it is like we got trolled! Axis have really good side tech with little effort but to stock up some resources. And they had to give pgrens double shrek and sprint vet! Who asked for that? Fricking op either with g43 or smg cqc. I had my 1 rifle bars squad rekt by a vetted pgren with sprint. Please remove sprint. Pgren have insane survival bonus already with vet and bulletins. They are almost like knight cross ez mode. Its not a sprint, its a combined arms speed buff. ITs not OP rather more than L2P. Your contribution with this comments is borderline zero with a negative tendency. Please remember Pgren buff was suggested to stop alt mainlines to roflstomp OST. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pwerfer on T328 Feb 2020, 07:16 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Feb 2020, 05:35 AMmrgame2 Pwafer too strong a unit to mess around with. Please remove its suppression or move to vet3. Early pwafer = less counters = weaker infantry = more survival = more vet levels. Every 2v2 games will face at least 1 vet 3 pwafer with this stupid suggestions Disrespect is not welcome, not on my threads at least. I said countless times now, feel free to disagree, even without an argument. Your arguments are as weak as a strawman. Early pwerfer means LV domination. Low skill games are a bad benchmark to any kind of balance evaluation. Just quit trolling here if you really want to participate. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pwerfer on T327 Feb 2020, 20:55 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 20:43 PMT.R. Stormjäger You're giving Ostheer the most late AA in the game. You're denying Ostheer a pure AI medium vehicle until a premium tier. You're putting the Ostwind and the Brummbar on the same tier which makes 0 sense since they do the same thing. You're allowing Ostheer players to get the rapid flame halftruck&puma combo with smoke cannisters, then rush the T3 panzerwerfer which deletes AT gun counterplay. Certainly true. The sole idea of swapping units causes a lot of mess. I think no change can leave all people content. i was aware of this drawbacks at least. I had the idea to suggest moving Pz4 to T4 + Lago´s tech revamp. This way T4 and T3 forks between the heavier armor and the support oriented armor. I considered this last idea to be too radical. Being said that, thanks to add and complete the picture of a change like moving Pwerfer to T3. I Hope everyone engaged will have all the information needed to judge it well. I am partly inclined not to push it though, but there is no reward on those who dont risk at all. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pwerfer on T327 Feb 2020, 20:40 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 18:12 PMelchino7 Dejavu, i've seen this suggestion before. As in the past, i don't think it will prosper at all. There are enough cons to offset any pros the idea might bring. I havent seen the prior suggestion. I came up with this idea myself. I want to know, which drawbacks does the Pwerfer on T3 generate? I have seen a few but there might be lots of issues i have not pictured yet. Also, Was this suggested a long time ago? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pwerfer on T327 Feb 2020, 17:09 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 16:50 PMKubelecer Did you know your T4 can lock down several points and secure you resource income for your stuka? It will also protect your stuka later against dives. Did you know your T4 unlocks Obers that you probably need since you were probably losing mid game because u had nothing to contest infantry and LVs with except volks? Did you know Ost as a faction has way better tools to support a pwerfer rush since they have linear tech and better team weapons and would get werfer in the same building they get Stugs and p4s compared to OKW that is forced to miss out on non ammo healing by going mechanical to even unlock stukas? Did you know that static gameplay of OST is harly viable now? Every allied faction has had indirect fire buffs, doctrinal infantries buffs ment to circumvent the MG42s, better adaptability overall for new flanking strategies? The frontline contest is no longer 1 sided towards the axis. They all overlooked the OST TW to the point we have to discuss this kind of topics A OKW T4 is a safe bet, maybe but not a comparable situation. You brought up the fastest pwerfer possible, i answered with a COMPARABLE OKW performance. And you didnt even mentioned other playstyle apart from the always repeated OKW build. No risk no rewards... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Its like Usf is just super powered27 Feb 2020, 16:58 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 12:11 PMGoldenpunch No one forcing you to play this game. And i think you have L2P issue. get a profile picture before saying to others to l2p. Or people here will consider you an adult account of the never ending forum trolls In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pwerfer on T327 Feb 2020, 16:50 PM Indeed a flanking maneuver is the correct approach, but on some maps it's a very risky or indirect solution. Imagine being in the middle of a 3v3, you should flank between two skilled players with their snares. Unless the rest of the teammates push at the same moment that pz4 is dead krupp stahl In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why maxim is trash27 Feb 2020, 16:46 PM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2020, 16:42 PMKubelecer So is Vickers. Incredible argument! Curious, if you want to use HISTORICAL arguments, what's your defence on Ost having Ostwind as a stock unit? What's your opinion on tigers getting random engine damage when moving? I think they should, it's what happened in WW2 after all. Of course, the historical data is for flavor and to put into some of the probability dead by idleness neurons in some people. But you can't deny maxim design is to be the worst at direct fire. But as people here like to say it's trash because they want it to be what it can't be. I want to drive a Maserati but the only I can afford is an used old bike. BLAME THE COMMUNITY! In: Lobby