1) I don't like double standards, and you're anything but an unbiased judge in this.
2) No, it's not a 50% buff. You clearly don't understand how math works or don't understand the difference between multiplication and subtraction. Going from a RA of 0.9 to 0.85 is not a 50% buff. By your retarded logic, if the old RA was 0.99 and the new one was 0.98, you would be screaming that UKF got a 100% buff. It's completely idiotic.
1) Lies, saying that IS got a 0.15% (0.0015) and 0.05% (0.0005) and saying at the same time that OST got 10-20% buffs is double standards. You lost your mind and judge everyone that thinks UKF got overbuffed, you are biased and i doubt you could identify an unbiased person.
2)It is a 50% buff because ALL MAINLINE INFANTRIES HAVE AROUND 1 RA. so if i "Buff" the RA BONUS IN COVER (wich was -0.10) to -0.15 means a 50% EXTRA COVER BONUS. The issue is around conditional sentences, not absolute values. It could mean a lot if we consider that IS is the first infanty UKF has and the only one with 0.85 RA.
I hope this settles down things