I think too that 251 IRHT is not worth its costs. It also provides a very valuable resource that is map vision, in the moment the game demands it the most. OKW still have arty flares and giving IRHT an OP sight is simply BS.
The unit cost is not par with how poorly it performs now. Its not sensible to make it cheaper.
What if the IRHT ability gives unobstructed sight at the same range it has now?
Either that or simply make the HT to spot on the minimap further than its map vision.
Cool!
I share the though of need for a Jackson as soon as the "big cats" heavy axis tanks come into play. Specially when they are rushed in stall strategies.
I understand i am calling to open the pandora box of lategame TDs but hopefully the chaos can be shaped along it is released.
M10 stock is being received very well as a possible step into a later Jackson. I hope that gives us all a hint to keep building a good idea. We have to pay attention that changing it will affect UKF.
You're talking about making a unit, and an entire faction worse than it is.
(offtopic)
I am trying to gather people to share their thoughts about the topic, hopefully bring some good ideas and make the game better for everyone. I dont like that you recurr to personal addressment to make no point at all, but at least i can answer you back with a straight face.
I have by no means the solution to every perspective. It can only be achieved by good communication and proper feedback. I encourage you to rephrase yourself into a objective argumentation and i will share your point of view aswell
If you have no intention to participate, then stay quiet and leave those who want do their best.
I agree that a any mortar can hit hard a pak howie. I do. It still depends a lot on RNG.
But PH is much better at indirect range vs stationary troops. Has better AoE, thus less RNG