Profile of distrofio

You are impossible to discuss with because you are incapable of maintaining a coherent train of thought, addressing what is actually being discussed or not insulting somebody. It's not worth it.

I am posting rational facts with the only connotation of proving each word of yours wrong.
If you consider that offensive, i sadly have to pinch your fantasy bubble into reality. Elaboration of facts is the best if not the only way to prove something is wrong/right.
Victimhood is not necessary here in order to get shed some light for the topic being discussed.

I also brought a lot of content that you blatantly ignored, so pls, if you disagree just say that, but dont play hero because its only hurting yourself.

I am in need to say that as long as you keep making personal accusations you are exposed to being accused in the same manner. Why dont you just stay in topic. Tnx

Something tells me that wouldn't go as well as you think.

My USF experience tells me, Grens can chill in cover and pick Riflemen as they approach...
It's hard to be cost inefficient when you are cheaper.

And this day the first allied biased player discovered, its a bad idea to face a DEFENSIVE troop IN COVER in a FRONTAL ASSAULT (didnt you ran through a road with negative cover too? it would be very appreciated the information)
Wow, riflemen should be like terminators, kill anything no brainer, approach and horde like some sort of zombie shooters.
But dont worry when IS get into heavy cover and garrison a building, no one will discuss how good they perform.

Don't see how anyone can argue that the mg42 should be 260mp while the .50 cal is 280 and the maxim is 260. The mg42 performance shouldn't be nerfed, but it's price is just nonsense.

Each factions unit cost is dependent of what the faction can achieve. Also each faction has powerspikes to keep clashes a back and forth fight. If you consider that OST has no CQC units until T2, Mg42 is the only way to stop rushing in units.
If you ignore, timestamps, relative faction escalation and resource allocation, oportunity costs and overall endgame, and compare plain simple stats vs cost, you wont understand why any unit of the game costs what it costs.
You dont compare blindly between factions end even less on units that are not meant to fight eachothers

Exactly, high risk/reward sistem there, MG42 are OP'ish, but once lost its very hard to recover them. Its a bad mistake to let that happen, i mean a punishing one.
On the other side until an MG42 is dropped it can be an uphill battle, no one disagrees with they overperformance, buts its a strange "feature" of the current early game.
I still think maxims need some love, some sort of buff

OR you should, because all things are related and don't work in isolation. In your POV you think B is fine, but maybe B is not fine at can be one of the reasons that by comparison A is been bad, even if against C is fine.
...

We both can agree with all the things are related. But in order to solve a single problem, you dont bring into the table other problems aswell, and make a mess of topics and no problem gets solved. I mean, B can/cannot be fine, but definitely A is broken, focus on fixing one problem at a time, cons in this case, i gave many suggestions but the hate towards enemy inf is too hyped and mainstream. Believe me or not, but this kind of discussions remind me of kids fightings. Cons can be fixed with a steady step, later volks get toned down, or OKM starting MP reduced, they are offtopic and their relation to this problem im particular is minimal.
Cons are expensive and not that useful. But everyones like to blame on axis inf. If you tone down volks, the next patch rifles will get toned down too, since balance there got broken for a stupid cons argument. Later grens/pzgrdiers too get toned down and so and so on. This logic is repeating itself so much i'd rather take the risk to do a diferent approach.

So what you suggest?

-Reduce power level of BAR rifles, STG Volks (they should have access to faster Obers) and not sure IS double bren (i don't know as much it's current situation).
-Make conscripts start with molotovs but lockdown Penal PTRS (maybe vanilla satchel) behind current AT package and rename it AT and demolition pack or something.
At this moment with current Oorah and molotov cost, i don't think of this as such an issue but i could be wrong.
-My fear with reducing reinforcing cost with tech, is that it could make PPSH based strats too spammable even if they are now at 60.
IF you can make a believable reason to exclude it somehow from PPSH conscripts, i could see it working with -1mp per each of the first 2 tiers and -2mp for T4.
-Don't give them LMG. Don't give them PPSH stock. I don't want a late game DPS upgrade. But if you suggest something, i'll rather it be a SVT pack or better, just Guards Mosins. You could call it training or something like that.

Great ideas, imo giving lmg upgrades to cons is not optimal too. Cons are not a ostruppen clone.
Maybe making reinforce cost really cheap can help too, they become "extra dispensable" this way.
If cons could trade effectively manpower maybe they could find some use in current game.
Free Oohraah! sounds fine. Having them with a cheaper molo and free Oohraah could give a shock value for cons and fight and use garrisons earlier than any other inf.

As no one really wants to give a detailed 1v1 matchup of current infantry balance, but all SU fans rant about cons sucking, i ask for Vipper or Katitof to raise some light.