Profile of distrofio

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2358

General Information


Thread: Command p417 Jul 2019, 16:48 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2019, 16:37 PMpvtgooner Snip "Axis tanks are 1 hit harder, that's OP" That is a solid argument. How little is needed for players to complaint. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Command p417 Jul 2019, 16:45 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2019, 16:16 PMSkysTheLimit Or it was OP before, hence why it was getting nerfed in the fist place? ... Not true and purely consensual. If a bunch of mobs say it is OP, would you trust them? Hoy much do they know of the whole picture. A lit of people struggle against su85 selfspot but is it OP? No. Many people can't deal with a with elephants in team games but are they OP? No. Even raketens are cheese but not OP. Dont misjudge difficulty with Over performing. If you have a holy crusade against auras then go make a thread about it. I still wait the argument of the OP part from you In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Command p417 Jul 2019, 16:36 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2019, 16:33 PMSkysTheLimit Here is my recommendation from the other thread. I would like to see most aura units receive a re-work of this style If you know the unit so much, the go to the point, a desk the buff it deserves rather some vague ideas with no sense or whatsoever. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: SU-76 Rework17 Jul 2019, 16:28 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jul 2019, 14:55 PMGI John 412 If the SU-76 has an issue it’s one of coat vs performance. As far as performance goes, the SU-76 has a role as a mobile and flexible TD in tier 3 that can also support with its light artillery barrage. It’s chief advantage over the Zis-3 is it’s mobility and inability to be killed by infantry small arms fire, while its chief weakness is its vulnerability to anti tank weapons. The SU-76 has a role, but it may be too expensive for that role. I suggest a simple cost reduction in its fuel price by 10-15 fuel, but no changes to its stats. I would also suggest a slight reduction to the cost of the StuG III as well, but that’s off topic. I politely disagree with you. I dont think su76 is a td, even when its gun solely proposes a threat to tanks,SU76 in game is like a self propelled zis, immune (almost) to small arms fire, a premium ATG rather a TD. It is way to weak to other armor though, if target size could be buffed or get the su85 selfspot it could find a place I agree with the fuel cost reduction idea. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Command p417 Jul 2019, 16:15 PM Stop feeding the troll boys, he only wants attention and is going to do anything for it. No one is able to describe the OP in the aura rather that "it makes axis tanks harder to kill" and that's a rant. When someone bring up a steamroll to their base and it was not because L2P, CPz4 will be worth a nerf In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Command p417 Jul 2019, 05:49 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2019, 04:02 AMSkysTheLimit Me: Auras promote blobbing You: Nerfing the command p4 from -20% to -10% won't end blobbing so stop dreaming I didn't say it would? Can you stop making up things to argue against? And stop trolling? Would you like to keep compaining?, does it feel better? It seems the troll here is not me. Whatever. The strawman fallacy is quite boring, quit using it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AT gun stealth17 Jul 2019, 03:50 AM I think that reducing sight when the raketen is cloacking is a good idea and a possible one too. Just like SU85s change their view range when toggle, something similar could be applied to raks when they go cloaking. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So are they really nerfing the Churchill Tank?17 Jul 2019, 03:39 AM @Derbyhat, i really agree with you, for some reason UKF timings are all messed up and its armor design is odd. Only with a good game secured by IS spam there is a chance to give UKF mediums some space to shine. Somehow UKF armor has low rish/low reward balance, that makes them not appealing, cromwells are not bad at all, but they cant pull a good play on their own too, even when they are almost (in the very broad meaning of the word) Pz4 clones with smoke. Churchills are truly safe bets because they are so durable and overall UKF is a slow paced faction. I know IRL facts never take place in balance discussions but it is worth saying churchills were outstanding good tanks. UKF is also in a weird spot because of game timings, lategame allies often have better nondoc tools, but UKF falls short. IMO the faction itself is designed about good defense but bad versatiliy, wich hurts reactive gameplay a lot. Comets could really use a utility/offensive buff paired with a utility nerf to churchills (to emphasize hammer tactics) In: Lobby
Thread: Command p417 Jul 2019, 03:24 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Jul 2019, 22:42 PMSkysTheLimit ... Not really, and if someone quotes me im going to respond to them. That's the entire point of quoting.... I'm sorry you don't like that either The one disliking CPz4 in the first place was not me. Its so easy to say "Man! Nerf this specifically and compensate with some sort of buff. I really doubt axis blobs will stop only because CPz4 got its aura to %10 but if you really like your dream bubble, i wont pop it up. Logic is not personal, its objective and most importantly, everyone can get to it if they follow the same thinking thread. I do not speak to debunk people for the sake of it, i just point flaws in the argumental logic they show. --- Final words on this topic: Since the most important aspect of the aura is to give medium armour and panthers an extra shot of effective HP and because that results to be very annoying for some players i think the only proper nerf is to make its aura some active ability without munition cost, in exange the tank will loose its firing capability. Given said nerf, the area of effect or the units affected could be changed to adjust the final unit potential. TL;DR Does it NEED a nerf? No./ Change something? Make aura active or toggle and loose main gun when the aura is on. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Command p416 Jul 2019, 22:27 PM Again we go personal... First and foremost you are not the only speaker here. Jump back to quoted post16 Jul 2019, 22:11 PMSkysTheLimit The fact is it was supposed to get nerfed and it didn't. That means nothing at all, literally nothing. Blame it on the devs for false promises if you really want. But its not a fact at all, its an opinion. It is a fact that auras promote blobbing Auras that promote blobbing, like the OKW sturmoffizier? I think not, by a long shot. As all auras have limited area of effect it will force players to clump their units inside, but that is not blobbing. Not at all. If a CPz4 is parked nearby howitzers is that blobbing? If the tank is babysitting some stugs is that blobbing? Even shrekblobs exist withouth the need of a CPz4 behind, it changes nothing. I never saw a pioblob protected by a CPz4 and being OP. It doesnt promote blobbing. it's a fact that the cmdp4 is stronger in team games than 1v1. Literally ALL AURAS are stronger in teamgames, so dont address that fault on CPz4 if you dont want to get rid of all auras before. Btw the tank is not stronger, its its aura. I have been giving you mostly facts not opinions I debunked all your facts. Please address to anyone reading instead of focusing personally. In: COH2 Balance