Profile of SuperHansFan

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 833

General Information


Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch23 Nov 2018, 12:39 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Nov 2018, 10:57 AMVipper Actually the have similar health and require the same number of shot from standard AT weapons Dozer even gets more health. Brumbar 800 Dozer 720 and 880 at vet 2. The rotation is not about balance is about scaling. Many units have only be balanced at vet 0 and scale better or worse than others. Issue with the brumbar is the vet armour AND health with ability for free bombard and easy wipe vs AT gun, this combined with magic panzer smoke means it has a bit too much survivability that leads reversing out with 10% health where Dozer is a ball of flame. Rotation means very little when both units are used to frontally drive up and wipe team weapons or blobs. They are not m10's... You talk of radio net stacking but brumbar + command P4 stacking is far more cancer, I mean how many times do you see vet 3 dozer with radio net compared to brumbar with command p4? The former I have never seen and the latter I see in almost every teamgame. Next you will be comparing comet to panther, comet must be better due to better rotation speed right? In: Lobby
Thread: Brit chess23 Nov 2018, 12:31 PM blobbing bren tommies is not that good because of the out of cover penalty. LMG grens actually do more DPS out of cover In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Simple UKF Base Howitzer Rework18 Nov 2018, 22:21 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Nov 2018, 19:46 PMLago The flares currently require you to flank a properly set up HMG to throw them, and if you can do that you don't need the flares in the first place. this is a good point, but usually if you flank it's faster to just kill the MG with small arms than wait for the rng base howi to land and ~~~~maybe~~~~ kill a couple of models. Early-midgame pyro before anvil reminds me of the old USF major arty in its current usefulness. I have faith the balance team can come up with a solution with all the good feedback ITT In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Simple UKF Base Howitzer Rework18 Nov 2018, 22:09 PM The upgrade and use just isn't worth it before the double howi, so 90muni which is a lot at the same time when you need med kits, sweeper, 75muni for wasp lul. This all just to slowly shell a house with a good 20 seconds of forewarning (squad running up with pyro, running into grenade range, throwing the nade, red flare and guns finally rotating and firing) just is NOT worth it for an MG in a garrison. Players do not fear it at all. I have never seen hans upgrade them before anvil in 1vs1, and I've never seen a player really make use of them unless it's a teamgame with muni flowing everywhere. The fix is easy: make the call in cost half the price until the second howitzer is built. Then maybe we would see a pyro squad or two. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: stuve 1v2s luvnest and refero4 Nov 2018, 23:29 PM pridepost despite scraping a win due to OP brumbar... lol really impressive luvnest would tear you guys apart in a 1vs1 In: Replays
Thread: Infantry Section stats and some other questions4 Nov 2018, 18:32 PM Jump back to quoted post4 Nov 2018, 15:14 PMJae For Jett Also, its semantics, but the removal of a debuff could be seen as a buff. It depends on what youre taking as the baseline. This is the sort of thing that just built up the hype to smashing UKF with the nerf hammer until even Hans gave them up. People taking the in cover stats with double brens and ignoring the weaker baseline stats and comparing them to volks begging for nerfs. So yea I don't like the fact people refer to it as a buff at all, a buff or bonus sounds like you're getting something for nothing on top of regular infantry upgrades... but the DPS of the weapon upgrades is weaker than on other infantry. Hence why I said the "bonus" was removed with the 10% in WBP In: UKF Strategies
Thread: Buff Ostwind4 Nov 2018, 12:08 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Oct 2018, 11:28 AMRMMLz You can't be serious. Centaur has massive burst damage and wipes units much better than Ostwind My opinion: AA is fine since axis already have MGs. I'd say increase far accuracy and reduce damage AoE a bit. Also could use a bit of fuel reduction. The DPS is roughly the same, "burst" damage was nerfed a while back. You'll be lucky if it kills two volk models a salvo now, which is OK because both Ostwind and Centaur are cheap as anything. why do you want to buff ostwind to old centaur levels? I can see some pretty obvious issues with AA tanks sniping from max range, it would make AT infantry useless. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Infantry Section stats and some other questions4 Nov 2018, 11:59 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Nov 2018, 08:41 AMSander93 Only the Received Accuracy (-10%) was removed. They still get better ROF from the cover bonus. No the only effective "buff" was the 10% RA in cover the "better RoF" basically means nothing with enfields and with brens it's noticeable, BUT what people don't realize is that it's effectively a debuff when they are out of cover. Compare the RoF with Sapper PIATS and the slow RoF of Tommy PIAT out of cover, this is because any picked up weapon is weaker RoF wise on Tommy than say grens or rifles, only in cover do they perform at normal levels. Cruzz explained this in detail In: UKF Strategies
Thread: Infantry Section stats and some other questions2 Nov 2018, 01:33 AM it's hard to compare tommies to volks in a vacuum, incediary nades really do balance things massivly into volks favor being able to make cover useless in short-mid engagements (much more so than slight differences to DPS at range or StG which is why you see many top players spamming nades rather that quad upgrading stg). Vs grens tommies have an easier time, tommy have more RA but grens have free rifle nade and MG42. You can pay upgrade 5man but then also your tommy pop is more expensive and you'll be reinforcing more, so there's a trade off (if there's no indirect etc I usually save the fuel and build another squad or call in commandos). Scoped enfields were removed and tommy cover bonus was also removed two patches ago. you're better off blobbing and a-moving now. In: UKF Strategies
Thread: Buff Ostwind29 Oct 2018, 18:06 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Oct 2018, 05:57 AMthedarkarmadillo Most king tigers were abandoned, but it's the Americans that can bail out not the OKW. Is-2 out produced King tigers but one is in only 2 doctrines and the other is in every single doctrine okw will ever get... Shermans and open top TD's like Jackson were easiest tanks to escape in the entire war, while US and british tank losses were high the crew usually got out safe. Vehicles like the Hetzer or Jagdpanzer were suicide wagons in comparison, so it makes sense US got emergency crew disembark and not OKW. If anything crew safety got worse for the Germans latewar with all these weird and cramped assault gun varieties making up the bulk of their armour. In: COH2 Balance