Profile of Smartie

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 857 | Subs: 2

General Information


Thread: New Commander patchnotes discussion thread1 Apr 2019, 14:41 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2019, 21:30 PMaerafield My thoughts so far on Version 2.0: - I personally think both Calliope and Assault Grenadiers are in a perfect spot now, no further changes needed I personally felt that Assgrens still underperformed in all games i played with the 1.0 versions. They died like flies without doing much damage to the enemy, The small buff in 2.0 didnt seem to solve that problem (see feedback in Wehrmacht thread). Thats why im surprised by your opinion. My question is: Did you play the 2.0 version ("thinking" based on test experience) or do you "just" think Assgrens are solid because of the patchnotes? In: Lobby
Thread: [POLL] AT satchels for Panzergrenadiers in the new doctrine31 Mar 2019, 18:24 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2019, 18:18 PMKatitof Multiplayer is set in 1944-45. Then we should change game modes to 2-1, 4-2 and 6-3 in favor of Allies to mirror historic power potential In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [POLL] AT satchels for Panzergrenadiers in the new doctrine31 Mar 2019, 18:09 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2019, 17:53 PMKatitof Well, one reason would be that germans didn't used satchel charges as a weapon, because shrecks and fausts were all that was needed, especially the latter were extremely cheap and plentiful. Thats true but only for the last years of the war. IN the beginning of "Barbarossa" the Wehrmacht didnt have good AT options at all with the exception of the rare 8,8 flak. Infantry used Bundle nades against weak points of T-34 and KV1 - so desperate was the situation. 3,7 cm / 5 cm paks were so bad against soviet tanks that german soldiers called them "Panzeranklopfgerät" because they coulnt do a shit. But i dont want to bring up this historical stuff to "justify" the proposed changes. There are pros and cons and gameplay should determinate if they make it to the next mod version. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [POLL] AT satchels for Panzergrenadiers in the new doctrine31 Mar 2019, 17:44 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2019, 17:36 PMLoliholic Panzer satchels are another stupid buff. Why do you want to take everything from allies and give it to axis and just buff the poop out of all the units to the point where theyre terminators at their job? Satchel is only there for the upgrade on Penals that makes them useless against anything but lights and satchel if u have bad micro. But u pay for that upgrade with no real AT or AI capability. Ridiculous. What next? Leopards in the Reserve armor doctrine? US cavalry infantry who come earlier and are a lot cheaper already has AT demos. Can you please explain why this upgrade should not be available for Pzgrens???? And it would occupy 1 commander slot! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [POLL] AT satchels for Panzergrenadiers in the new doctrine31 Mar 2019, 16:31 PM Thx Jagd wölfe! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehrmacht - Strategic Reserves - Feedback31 Mar 2019, 16:22 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2019, 16:19 PMjagd wölfe Would make a poll about at satchel. Normal satchel are more reasonable and fitting imho. Also, panzershreck Could you do a poll? AT satchel should be mutually exclusive with Schreckupgrade. In: Lobby
Thread: Wehrmacht - Strategic Reserves - Feedback31 Mar 2019, 16:14 PM @mod team: There are plenty of threads about the new commanders and its hard to get an overview. I will try to summarize and update some feedback here. I hope it helps. I will neither include the KT-Ace and JP4-PZ$ switch nor the forward supply station idea. Why? If the mod team would have considered these changes we would have seen one of them in the 2.0 version. Summary of Feedback: Updated! 31.3. Assgrens: - Faster capping is a nice buff but the unit is still too weak to justify the cost, needs further buffs Breakthrough Equipment: - Satchel for Pzgrens should be replaced by AT satchel or the Pzgren support Package from "German Infantry" - Pios should get standard satchel as part of their mine sweeping upgrade PZIV: -unit should be more expensive, have less armor but have more hit points - Wehrmacht players should be regarded for teching: PZIV should be available in T3 AND T4 TigerAce: ~~- MP cost is too high, should be reduced to 720 MP~~ After starting with 1 vet, 800 MP seem reasonable In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet - Airbourne feedback31 Mar 2019, 12:53 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2019, 12:44 PMKatitof Add KT and calliope to that list and pretty much every other unit is in good shape. Agreed again, and Calliope is getting already a rework. A lot better in the 2.o version. Cons getting a deserved rework would bring so much benefits for the faction, same for Pzgrens. Lets cross our fingers that we get this balance patch in the not so distant future. In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet - Airbourne feedback31 Mar 2019, 12:39 PM Jump back to quoted post31 Mar 2019, 12:31 PMKatitof I would also like to see SVT as T3 or T4 stock con upgrade and doctrinal ability replaced with regular PPSH. Agreed, SVT for Cons should be a stock upgrade. Looking at the big picture its getting more and more clear that we should get an additional balance patch in the summer after the new commanders are released. Cons,IS2, Pzgrens and Ostwind are units that deserve some attention. In: Lobby
Thread: Soviet - Airbourne feedback31 Mar 2019, 08:01 AM About Airborne Guards: Unit has way too many abilities, IL-2 Strafe really needs to go. Doctrine itself is fun to play, gives you a lot of flexibility. In: Lobby