Profile of gbem

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1979

General Information


Thread: Conscript 7th men too much?20 Oct 2020, 13:31 PM i feel this discussion does not deserve to exist... were talking about nerfing the weakest mainline infantry in the weakest faction in the game... this discussion does not make any sense at all... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why Soviets are OP19 Oct 2020, 15:19 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2020, 15:14 PMVipper Well it seem we look thing differently. aye... id guess its a matter of perspective on the point of the panther.. however i think we all can agree that the jackson needs to be toned down... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why Soviets are OP19 Oct 2020, 15:07 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2020, 14:58 PMVipper So according to you a Panther should have a 70% chance to damage a medium at range 50 and and SU-85 should have a chance of 80% range 60 and 104% once vetted. yep... the panther is still somewhat decent against infantry while being armored and faster... the panther can in fact solo the SU-85 1v1 pretty easily and it has no chance of escaping... only when infantry is involved does the SU-85 stand a chance but hey soviet infantry is made of the finest quality swiss cheese unless doctrines are involved... now if the SU-85 were fast and turreted on top of having a great gun it would most certainly be OP... but at the moment it trades almost everything for its powerful gun... its most certainly balanced... there is another tank destroyer though which does have a turret and is crazy fast while having a top of the line gun... thats the unit you should be looking at... not the SU-85 Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2020, 14:58 PMVipper How many games have you won because your opponent build a su-85. youre not getting the point... its about forcing the enemy to react to you and to overcommit resources... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why Soviets are OP19 Oct 2020, 14:56 PM yeah and for some dumb reason people still want to nerf the worst faction in the game... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why Soviets are OP19 Oct 2020, 14:50 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2020, 14:49 PMSpoof First of all, this data is "just plain winrate", and this is the exact data I was referring to. Secondly, while it may seem that Soviets have the lowest winrate, I would like to remind you that the Eastern Front factions tend to have more players than the Western Front factions. So take it with a grain of salt because unless you take more specific data from say the top 1000 players of each faction, the low Soviet win rate could be because there is an excess of players (and therefore noobs) within the faction. what? thats winrate per ladder position... that winrate already gives the average winrate of a faction relative to their position in the ladder... it adjusts for "how many noobs" a faction has already... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why Soviets are OP19 Oct 2020, 14:45 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2020, 14:43 PMSpoof This data is statistically insignificant. The average does not differentiate between noobs and high level players. Of course OKW noobs will crush noobs from other factions. But at higher level play OKW fares worse and Soviets fare a better because once anyone actually takes the time to learn the game, Soviets become much more versatile while OKW becomes easy to abuse. I think it's better to put more emphasis on the stats from higher rankings because these players are actually knowledgable when it comes to game mechanics. actually theres more data than just plain winrate... SOV consistently has the lowest winrate out of almost every point in the ladder so far... the faction is grossly underpowered In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why Soviets are OP19 Oct 2020, 14:42 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2020, 14:34 PMVipper That does not answer the question. it does... the answer is the panther is fine... Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2020, 14:34 PMVipper Weird definition of win. what? if the opponent buys an SU-85 as area denial to your cheaper panzer 4 and ONLY your cheaper Panzer 4 then its a clear win on your end... all you simply have to do is to punish the soviet player for this by using infantry... Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2020, 14:34 PMVipper Yes staying at range 60 and chipping away the enemy HP sound far less efficient than having to micro a squishy vehicles and waste munition on smoke just to keep it alive. I guess that is why people are spamming Puma to counter allied mediums. Let me explain this in plain English Puma is primarily used to counter allied light vehicles because without it they can bleed you dry and that is irrelevant to the SU-76. let me ask you then as to why alot more people field pumas as opposed to SU-76s? theres a good reason why the SU-76 is barely used if at all... In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why Soviets are OP19 Oct 2020, 14:31 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2020, 14:29 PMullumulu from a 1v1 view? Otherwise you spelled "OKW" wrong. the soviets have a lower winrate than OKW https://www.coh2.org/topic/105597/1v1-automatch-stats/page/1#post_id822826 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why Soviets are OP19 Oct 2020, 14:09 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2020, 13:57 PMHannibal SU85 could easily be toned down to +15-+20% pen with vet. Currently it gets 95% pen chance at vet3 vs 300 armor, that's more than plenty. Against a vet3 SU85, both SOV and OST player will assume that all shots penetrate. Plus they have the best snare infantry in the game. why tone down the soviets though? theyre already the shittiest faction according to automatch stats... and the shittiest allied faction in the game... no need to make them suck more In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why Soviets are OP19 Oct 2020, 14:04 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2020, 11:40 AMVipper So in your opinion the Panther who is even more expensive than a SU-85 how much change should it have to damage a medium allied tank at range 50. the panther is fine because it has a turret is faster is more armored and has some use vs infantry especially with the pintle... the tradeoff between the 60 range gun and the armor + turret + speed + usefulness vs infantry is very much worth its cost... theres a reason why people prefer the panther over the jagdpanzer4 despite the fact that the JP4 can counter all stock allied armor except the churchill Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2020, 11:40 AMVipper Again if you can not counter PzIV with SU-85 you are probably doing something wrong. Risking a PzIV to kill a couple of conscripts models in not a great use of the unit. and having an enemy buy an SU-85 to counter the panzer 4 that comes earlier than the SU-85 is a win for you... you forced the enemy to buy a unit that counters your one unit which bullies the opponent all the way till they get the SU-85... soo you know for sure that 1. the opponent spent more than you 2. the opponent now locked down a large portion of their CP on dedicated anti armor 3. the opponent wont be fielding anything competent against infantry anytime soon unless youre airborne... theres a reason why i always prefer getting a T-34 first as airborne... Jump back to quoted post19 Oct 2020, 11:40 AMVipper Does a 1vs1 duel in a vacuum make SU-76 have low DPS vs mediums? I have provided the stat and they are crystal clear the SU-76's DPS is line if not superior for cost. The claim that SU-76 has low DPS is simply false, pls move on. it isnt lower in terms of raw DPS but it isnt efficient at conveying that DPS... when compared to the puma the latter can far more efficiently convey its DPS into its target In: COH2 Balance