Profile of MarioSilver

Jump back to quoted post4 Jul 2017, 01:01 AMnee

It's called precedence. They HAVE accepted changes from modders through their balance previews in the past; the only good news is that the current stuff were not part of those past changes.

That response is also not saying "we don't accept changes from mods", only they are not considering it at this time. Which, if you know your average politician or publisher, more often than not means they're not confirming it yet.

Jump back to quoted post1 Jul 2017, 17:24 PM|GB| The Hooligan486

That's not true, you'll see.

• At least one relplay, where the modder indicates the current performance problems, and why any nerfs/or buffs are needed.
  
  
• A minimum of one replay against real equally skilled players, where the player proves that his suggested changes;
  
  • Improve the overall balance,
    
  • Does not render the unit useless or unattractive in any way
    
    
  
  
  
  This is much more convincing than adding a few words like "we buffed it cause we felt like it" as the description for proposed changes.
  

Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2017, 21:00 PMelchino7

When people refuse to show their playercard or replays of their game, that's a huge sign that the problems they might be facing are not due to balance but rather their own skill set.
In a similar way, solution to problems might not be feasible depending on the skillbracket.

Ex: kitting penals PTRS with light vehicle/tanks. This is something i would generally say, but if i'm advising someone at the 1000/2000 or even lower ranks, i would suggest other approaches.
Same if i tell anyone to use a sniper. At those levels i'll rather tell them to get another unit cause microing a sniper takes the few APM they have in a single unit they might not take full profit out of it.

Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2017, 13:44 PMFinndeed

Playercard please.