Profile of Jae For Jett

Indeed, which is why I still don't understand why my ideas are unheard. Are my ideas so radical that making the cromwell or KT not miss blindly every 3/4 shots too extreme? Not trying to attack miragefla, but him stating "the kt is fine, it just needs a small cost reduction" is absolutely laughable when you look at past tourney usage. KotH and SCC combined there was only 1 usage to my knowledge. And the person who used it was you, and you lost with that unit.

Dont recall building a KT in either of those two (my memory could be failing me though). And tbh, yes. Any change to the cromwell's or KT's scatter can massively swing their effectiveness. Buffing scatter can easily change a tank into a wipe machine.

Furthermore, I've said much the same thing that miragefla has, the KT probably needs minor adjustments because the reason why the KT isnt built doesnt even really have to do with its performance. Floating 280 fuel against another top player just doesn't work. Any situation where you can float that much fuel without losing is a situation where spending that fuel in any other way would have closed out the game already.

Let me illustrate it with an extreme example: what if you had a vehicle that costed 400 fuel, and it basically won you the game if you got it. It would still never be used. The effectiveness of the unit is irrelevant, the point is that any situation where you could have floated that much fuel is a situation where you could have just won without getting that unit. And to be honest, 400 fuel isnt even THAT far off of how much a KT costs. Mech costs 65 fuel, so the KT's effective cost is around 345. This cost increased since the last patch, which could be a compounding factor in why its not used as much/at all. Since mech was the meta last patch, you already had mech, battlegroup, and schewerer up when you were getting your first tank; therefore, the KT effectively costed 280 fuel (and 720 manpower). Since most players wont have mech when they get their schwerer up, the KT now effectively costs 345 fuel (and 1020 manpower).

Changed this in DBP IIRC. only models hit by the blast are stunned, not that that helps if you're trying to move.

That change was reverted in one of the iterations and wasn't implemented in the final patch.

Just overall on the patch notes so far there are some decent hits, and there are some very large misses. I'd elaborate but no one listens to my recommendations anyways

Not trying to sound condescending (though thats probably exactly what I'm doing) but there are a lot of extremely good players who have already offered their opinions on most of these subjects. A lot of the changes that many people have ridiculed (whether theyre blatantly biased players, rank 2000+ 4v4 players, decent players, forum members that dont even play the game anymore, etc.) were made under the advisement of or were suggested by the literal best players that this community has; this includes players from all game sizes (1v1, 2v2, and 3v3+4v4). With these kinds of balance threads generating a lot of...noise, and with almost every other person having directly opposite impressions and opinions of the changes, its kind of natural to place the most importance on feedback from top players who, quite frankly, have shown that they actually understand the game. Given how large the skill/knowledge gap is between the tournament winners and, well, everyone else, they kind of earned the credibility that was given to them. And yes, that unfortunately means that a lot of people's opinions will go under the radar.

I assume what happend
Its old but almost nobody does it^^

Of course. But im sure you'd agree that its a massive issue when it actually is used.

Well this is a big nerf, if you knew the “exploit.” Stacking units inside medpack radius will heal em all in one use. Whole armies.

Now you pay more and only single use. Love it as is really.

It's still 3 medkits in the stack, just now 45 munis instead of 30, and healing in an aoe. With them now actually being intended as aoe heals, they need a new cost, and you have to start "somewhere". 45 seems like that "somewhere".