Profile of FelixTHM

event pre dec2019 patch, 4 man sections behind sandbags still often lose to charging spios with the exceptions of some extreme RNG 2 models drof before point blank, and even then, 3 models sectios vs 2 models spio point blank is till RNG for sections.

And where did the 4th model go before sturmpios closed in? Sturmpios do close to no damage before getting within 10 range of the tommies behind sandbags. It was super common and almost a given for pre-nerf Tommies to stomp charging Sturmpios - you're confusing 20 range with max range.

UKF issues in earlier patches were because of a shocking lack of basic tools and never because of Tommies. UKF stock version has no flamer no smoke no mortar no rocket arty no CQC troops, and way back it was even worse with no snares.

Tommies in earlier patches stomped OKW infantry throughout every phase of the game, and it was made worse by an ultra cancerous UC which used to have more armour than a 222, which made it unkillable even by 3 Volks in green cover.

In any case your point as usual holds no water, and is a weak attempt at "trolling".

Riflemen need a long range nerf to give Grenadiers/Volks an actual engagement range or a reduction in close range DPS. I'm in favour of the former because Ass grens might become too oppressive vs USF if Rifles got a close range nerf.

Stumpio was able to charge infantry sections behind sandbags from max range and win for years by now. When i asked about it, I was told that stum is 30mp more expensive and is a mid to close unit so charging in and win again sections, which is long range unit, is ok. I suggest you apply the same logic for volk vs rifle match up.

By years you mean literally just the last patch. Technically Dec 2019 to Feb 2020, okay, but you're really clutching at straws when it comes to "years" here.

Applying "the same logic" would be incredibly stupid since they're literally not the same situation. Volks vs Rifles is a mainline vs mainline situation and not a mainline vs single CQC specialist situation. Volks vs Rifles is a fair fight at long range, whereas everyone, even Combat Engineers and Rear Echelons, will dominate Sturms in a long range engagement.

There's literally nothing similar about those two situations.

An actual comparison to Sturms vs Tommies would be Ass Grens vs Rifles. Given that CQC squads are meant to win engagements at the expense of bleeding more, we can see the problem with rifles here. Rifles do too much close range dps to Ass Grens as they close in, and hence the CQC squad (Ass Grens) can't win in any situation unless one player totally outplays the other or uses muni to overcome this disadvantage.

In any case, since you have never played COH2 at any competent level, CQC units always beat their regular or elite counterparts when charging in. Shocks and Thompson Rangers can charge in vs LMG Obers and win. Doesn't mean LMG Obers are bad. In fact Shocks can easily charge 2 squads of unupgraded grenadiers or Volks from max range and stomp them with minimal losses. Pioneers charging in also beat Combat Engineers.

What's the difference? Riflemen aren't a designated CQC squad. They have decent long range dps and good mid range dps.

The complaints about Fallschrimjaegers being too good at all ranges is the one most similar to the complaint we have about Riflemen. Right now there's no range at which a Volks squad can come out ahead vs Riflemen, forcing OKW to rely on good mg34 play, Luchs, or Falls abuse to keep him competitive in the mid game.

They hesitate to nerf the pakhowie cuz its an underpowered unit in 1v1 I am afraid

Also: https://www.coh2.org/topic/103761/usf-indirect-fire-stalemate/post/803247

Is there really evidence for that?

I use it a lot in 1 v 1 and see it a fair bit when I play Ost. Backtech/Second tech to Captain for AT gun and Pack howie isn't as uncommon as you'd think, especially for Heavy Cav and Tac Support users. Recon Support and Captain openers are also viable paths through which we'd see a pack howie.

It's true that LT is meta, but the Pack Howie definitely pays for itself in 1 v 1, especially on maps like Lost Glider, Faymonville Approach etc.

How is asking for video proof trolling? How long does it take to kill the 222, whats the difference if the 222 is closer/further away. You might hate on my posts but at least they have videos that demonstrate the issue and not just "Take my word for it!".

Your videos are three enemy squads ambushing your low health squad running across a red cover retreat path and you somehow extrapolating that into "opponent's thing is OP". The only things your videos proved were that you were terrible.

"Just take my word for it" is actually more effective/reasonable than the videos you provided.

I believe G43s moving acc needs to be seriously toned down, but your videos were so bad that they pointed everyone in the opposite direction.

Please stop making threads like this, CODGUY. I know you are better than this.

He isn't, I've played vs him before.